Literature DB >> 33750327

Prescription practice and clinical utility of chest radiographs in a pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

Rajeev Gupta1, Karthi Nallasamy2, Vijai Williams1, Akshay Kumar Saxena3, Muralidharan Jayashree1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest radiograph (CXR) prescribing pattern and practice vary widely among pediatric intensive care units (PICU). 'On demand' approach is increasingly recommended as against daily 'routine' CXRs; however, the real-world practice is largely unknown.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed in children younger than 12 years admitted to PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Data were collected on all consecutive CXRs performed between December 2016 and April 2017. The primary outcome was to assess the factors that were associated with higher chest radiograph prescriptions in PICU. Secondary outcomes were to study the indications, association with mechanical ventilation, image quality and avoidable radiation exposure.
RESULTS: Of 303 children admitted during the study period, 159 underwent a total of 524 CXRs in PICU. Median (IQR) age of the study cohort was 2 (0.6-5) years. More than two thirds [n = 115, 72.3%] were mechanically ventilated. Most CXRs (n = 449, 85.7%) were performed on mechanically ventilated patients, amounting to a median (IQR) of 3 (2-5) radiographs per ventilated patient. With increasing duration of ventilation, the number of CXRs proportionately increased in the first two weeks of mechanical ventilation. In non-ventilated children, about two thirds (68%) underwent only one CXR. Majority of the prescriptions were on demand (n = 461, 88%). Most common indications were peri-procedure prescriptions (37%) followed by evaluation for respiratory disease status (24%). About 40% CXRs resulted in interventions; adjustment in ventilator settings (13.5%) was the most frequent intervention. In 26% (n = 138) of radiographs, image quality required improvement. One or more additional body part exposure other than chest and upper abdomen were noted 336 (64%) images. Children with > 3 CXR had higher PRISM III score, more often mechanically ventilated, had higher number of indwelling devices [mean (SD) 2.6 (1.2) vs. 1.7 (1.0)] and stayed longer in PICU [median (IQR) 11(7.5-18.5) vs. 6 (3-9)].
CONCLUSION: On demand prescription was the prevalent practice in our PICU. Most non-ventilated children underwent only one CXR while duration of PICU stay and the number of devices determined the number of CXRs in mechanically ventilated children. Quality improvement strategies should concentrate on the process of acquisition of images and limiting the radiation exposure to unwanted body parts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest radiograph; On demand; PICU; Quality improvement; Ventilation; X-ray

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33750327      PMCID: PMC7941116          DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00576-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Imaging        ISSN: 1471-2342            Impact factor:   1.930


  26 in total

1.  Low value of routine chest radiographs in a mixed medical-surgical ICU.

Authors:  Karin A Hendrikse; Jan Willem C Gratama; Wim ten Hove; Johannes H Rommes; Marcus J Schultz; Peter E Spronk
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Update on digital radiography.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Martin Uffmann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Routine Chest Radiography.

Authors:  Barbara L McComb; Jonathan H Chung; Traves D Crabtree; Darel E Heitkamp; Mark D Iannettoni; Clinton Jokerst; Anthony G Saleh; Rakesh D Shah; Robert M Steiner; Tan-Lucien H Mohammed; James G Ravenel
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Is chest radiography necessary after uncomplicated insertion of a triple-lumen catheter in the right internal jugular vein, using the anterior approach?

Authors:  Klaus-Dieter Lessnau
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Implementation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce daily chest radiographs in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Eric Sy; Michael Luong; Michael Quon; Young Kim; Sadra Sharifi; Monica Norena; Hubert Wong; Najib Ayas; Jonathon Leipsic; Peter Dodek
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Utility of daily routine portable chest X-ray in mechanically ventilated patients in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hind Bafaqih; Suliman Almohaimeed; Farah Thabet; Abdulrahman Alhejaili; Reda Alarabi; Mohammed Zolaly; Khalid Baqais; Khaled Kasim; May Chehab
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2014-03

7.  Abandoning daily routine chest radiography in the intensive care unit: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuji Oba; Tareq Zaza
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  ACR appropriateness criteria routine chest radiographs in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Judith K Amorosa; Mark Paul Bramwit; Tan-Lucien H Mohammed; Gautham P Reddy; Kathleen Brown; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E Ginsburg; Darel E Heitkamp; Jean Jeudy; Jacobo Kirsch; Heber MacMahon; James G Ravenel; Anthony G Saleh; Rakesh D Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 9.  Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anusoumya Ganapathy; Neill K J Adhikari; Jamie Spiegelman; Damon C Scales
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Henk W Venema; Martin Uffmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.