Rajeev Gupta1, Karthi Nallasamy2, Vijai Williams1, Akshay Kumar Saxena3, Muralidharan Jayashree1. 1. Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care Units, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India. 2. Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care Units, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India. ny.karthi@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chest radiograph (CXR) prescribing pattern and practice vary widely among pediatric intensive care units (PICU). 'On demand' approach is increasingly recommended as against daily 'routine' CXRs; however, the real-world practice is largely unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed in children younger than 12 years admitted to PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Data were collected on all consecutive CXRs performed between December 2016 and April 2017. The primary outcome was to assess the factors that were associated with higher chest radiograph prescriptions in PICU. Secondary outcomes were to study the indications, association with mechanical ventilation, image quality and avoidable radiation exposure. RESULTS: Of 303 children admitted during the study period, 159 underwent a total of 524 CXRs in PICU. Median (IQR) age of the study cohort was 2 (0.6-5) years. More than two thirds [n = 115, 72.3%] were mechanically ventilated. Most CXRs (n = 449, 85.7%) were performed on mechanically ventilated patients, amounting to a median (IQR) of 3 (2-5) radiographs per ventilated patient. With increasing duration of ventilation, the number of CXRs proportionately increased in the first two weeks of mechanical ventilation. In non-ventilated children, about two thirds (68%) underwent only one CXR. Majority of the prescriptions were on demand (n = 461, 88%). Most common indications were peri-procedure prescriptions (37%) followed by evaluation for respiratory disease status (24%). About 40% CXRs resulted in interventions; adjustment in ventilator settings (13.5%) was the most frequent intervention. In 26% (n = 138) of radiographs, image quality required improvement. One or more additional body part exposure other than chest and upper abdomen were noted 336 (64%) images. Children with > 3 CXR had higher PRISM III score, more often mechanically ventilated, had higher number of indwelling devices [mean (SD) 2.6 (1.2) vs. 1.7 (1.0)] and stayed longer in PICU [median (IQR) 11(7.5-18.5) vs. 6 (3-9)]. CONCLUSION: On demand prescription was the prevalent practice in our PICU. Most non-ventilated children underwent only one CXR while duration of PICU stay and the number of devices determined the number of CXRs in mechanically ventilated children. Quality improvement strategies should concentrate on the process of acquisition of images and limiting the radiation exposure to unwanted body parts.
BACKGROUND: Chest radiograph (CXR) prescribing pattern and practice vary widely among pediatric intensive care units (PICU). 'On demand' approach is increasingly recommended as against daily 'routine' CXRs; however, the real-world practice is largely unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed in children younger than 12 years admitted to PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Data were collected on all consecutive CXRs performed between December 2016 and April 2017. The primary outcome was to assess the factors that were associated with higher chest radiograph prescriptions in PICU. Secondary outcomes were to study the indications, association with mechanical ventilation, image quality and avoidable radiation exposure. RESULTS: Of 303 children admitted during the study period, 159 underwent a total of 524 CXRs in PICU. Median (IQR) age of the study cohort was 2 (0.6-5) years. More than two thirds [n = 115, 72.3%] were mechanically ventilated. Most CXRs (n = 449, 85.7%) were performed on mechanically ventilated patients, amounting to a median (IQR) of 3 (2-5) radiographs per ventilated patient. With increasing duration of ventilation, the number of CXRs proportionately increased in the first two weeks of mechanical ventilation. In non-ventilated children, about two thirds (68%) underwent only one CXR. Majority of the prescriptions were on demand (n = 461, 88%). Most common indications were peri-procedure prescriptions (37%) followed by evaluation for respiratory disease status (24%). About 40% CXRs resulted in interventions; adjustment in ventilator settings (13.5%) was the most frequent intervention. In 26% (n = 138) of radiographs, image quality required improvement. One or more additional body part exposure other than chest and upper abdomen were noted 336 (64%) images. Children with > 3 CXR had higher PRISM III score, more often mechanically ventilated, had higher number of indwelling devices [mean (SD) 2.6 (1.2) vs. 1.7 (1.0)] and stayed longer in PICU [median (IQR) 11(7.5-18.5) vs. 6 (3-9)]. CONCLUSION: On demand prescription was the prevalent practice in our PICU. Most non-ventilated children underwent only one CXR while duration of PICU stay and the number of devices determined the number of CXRs in mechanically ventilated children. Quality improvement strategies should concentrate on the process of acquisition of images and limiting the radiation exposure to unwanted body parts.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chest radiograph; On demand; PICU; Quality improvement; Ventilation; X-ray
Authors: Karin A Hendrikse; Jan Willem C Gratama; Wim ten Hove; Johannes H Rommes; Marcus J Schultz; Peter E Spronk Journal: Chest Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Barbara L McComb; Jonathan H Chung; Traves D Crabtree; Darel E Heitkamp; Mark D Iannettoni; Clinton Jokerst; Anthony G Saleh; Rakesh D Shah; Robert M Steiner; Tan-Lucien H Mohammed; James G Ravenel Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Eric Sy; Michael Luong; Michael Quon; Young Kim; Sadra Sharifi; Monica Norena; Hubert Wong; Najib Ayas; Jonathon Leipsic; Peter Dodek Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Judith K Amorosa; Mark Paul Bramwit; Tan-Lucien H Mohammed; Gautham P Reddy; Kathleen Brown; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E Ginsburg; Darel E Heitkamp; Jean Jeudy; Jacobo Kirsch; Heber MacMahon; James G Ravenel; Anthony G Saleh; Rakesh D Shah Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.532