Literature DB >> 33750308

Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens.

Lang Yang1, Hua Jin2, Xiao-Li Xie2, Yang-Tian Cao1, Zhen-Hua Liu2, Na Li1, Peng Jin1, Yu-Qi He1, Jian-Qiu Sheng3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatment. In this study we aimed to investigate how to solve this histological discrepancy and avoid over- and under-treatment.
METHODS: The medical records of patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia who underwent endoscopic resection at our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The histological discrepancy between the biopsy and resected specimens was calculated and its association with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 137 lesions from 129 patients were included. The discrepancy rate between forceps biopsy and resected specimens was 45.3% (62/137). Histological discrepancy was associated with the histological category of the biopsy (p < 0.001). In addition, 17 of the 30 (56.7%) biopsies that was diagnosed as indefinite/negative for neoplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were upgraded to HGIN or ESCC after resection. The upgrade was due to lesion size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.002) and type B intrapapillary capillary loops (p < 0.001). Moreover, 34 of the 83 biopsies that were diagnosed with HGIN were upgraded to ESCC after resection, which was related to lesion size (p = 0.001), location (p = 0.018), and pink color sign (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Histological discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resected specimens is common in clinical practice. Recognizing the risk factors for each histological category of biopsy may reduce these discrepancies and improve clinical management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Endoscopy; Esophageal neoplasia; Histology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33750308      PMCID: PMC7941920          DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01694-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   2.847


  33 in total

Review 1.  Early esophageal cancer screening in China.

Authors:  Qin-Yan Gao; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.043

2.  Effects of endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with low-grade intraepithelial dysplasia of esophageal squamous cells.

Authors:  Hao Li; Juan Li Cheng; Ning Ning Dong; Chun Yong Cui; Tao Yu Diao; Xue Rui Zhou
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ryu Ishihara; Miwako Arima; Toshiro Iizuka; Tsuneo Oyama; Chikatoshi Katada; Motohiko Kato; Kenichi Goda; Osamu Goto; Kyosuke Tanaka; Tomonori Yano; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Manabu Muto; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Masahiro Yoshida; Kazuma Fujimoto; Hisao Tajiri; Haruhiro Inoue
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.559

4.  Risk factors associated with histological upgrade of gastric low-grade dysplasia on pretreatment biopsy.

Authors:  Lang Yang; Peng Jin; Xin Wang; Tong Zhang; Yu Qi He; Xiao Jun Zhao; Na Li; Guang Zhi Yang; Jian Qiu Sheng
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.325

Review 5.  Significance of background coloration in endoscopic detection of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  H Minami; H Isomoto; H Inoue; Y Akazawa; N Yamaguchi; K Ohnita; F Takeshima; T Hayashi; T Nakayama; K Nakao
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic multiband mucosectomy for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia: a retrospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Zhenkai Wang; Heng Lu; Lin Wu; Boshi Yuan; Jiong Liu; Hui Shi; Fangyu Wang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Prediction of lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Xiao-Bo Liu; Sheng-Bao Li; Zhi-Hao Yang; Qiang Tong
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Pink-color sign in esophageal squamous neoplasia, and speculation regarding the underlying mechanism.

Authors:  Ryu Ishihara; Hiromitsu Kanzaki; Hiroyasu Iishi; Kengo Nagai; Fumi Matsui; Takeshi Yamashina; Noriko Matsuura; Takashi Ito; Mototsugu Fujii; Sachiko Yamamoto; Noboru Hanaoka; Yoji Takeuchi; Koji Higashino; Noriya Uedo; Masaharu Tatsuta; Yasuhiko Tomita; Shingo Ishiguro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Optimal number of biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  N Lal; D K Bhasin; A K Malik; N M Gupta; K Singh; S K Mehta
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Jong Wook Kim; Jie-Hyun Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Yang Won Min; Si Hyung Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Hyunsoo Chung; Kee Don Choi; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Min-Seob Kwak; Bun Kim; Hyun Jung Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Miyoung Choi; Dong-Ah Park; Jong Yeul Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chan Guk Park; Joo Young Cho; Soo Teik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2020-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.