Thomas M Adams1, Tjelvar S G Olsson1, Ricardo H Ramírez-González1, Ruth Bryant2, Rosie Bryson3, Pablo Eduardo Campos4, Paul Fenwick5, David Feuerhelm6, Charlotte Hayes7, Tina Henriksson8, Amelia Hubbard9, Radivoje Jevtić10, Christopher Judge9, Matthew Kerton11, Jacob Lage12, Clare M Lewis1, Christine Lilly13, Udi Meidan14, Dario Novoselović15, Colin Patrick16, Ruth Wanyera17, Diane G O Saunders18. 1. John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK. 2. RAGT Seeds Ltd, Grange Road, Ickleton, Essex, CB10 1TA, UK. 3. BASF SE, Agricultural Centre, Limburgerhof, Germany. 4. INTA EEA Bordenave, Bordenave, 8187, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Limagrain UK Ltd, Woolpit, IP30 9UP, UK. 6. Syngenta Seeds Ltd, Hill Farm Road, Cambridgeshire, CB22 4QT, UK. 7. Elsoms Wheat Ltd, Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE11 1QG, UK. 8. Lantmännen Lantbruk, Svalöv, Sweden. 9. NIAB, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK. 10. Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia. 11. DSV United Kingdom Ltd, Banbury, Oxfordshire, OX17 1FE, UK. 12. KWS UK Limited, Hertfordshire, SG8 7RE, UK. 13. Frontier Agriculture, Witham St Hughs, Lincolnshire, LN6 9TN, UK. 14. Hazera Seeds Ltd., Berurim M.P Shikmim, 7983700, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel. 15. Agricultural Institute Osijek, Osijek, Croatia. 16. Masstock Arable (UK) Ltd. (trading as Agrii), Andoversford, Gloucestershire, GL54 4LZ, UK. 17. Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Njoro, Nakuru, Kenya. 18. John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK. Diane.Saunders@jic.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcriptomics is being increasingly applied to generate new insight into the interactions between plants and their pathogens. For the wheat yellow (stripe) rust pathogen (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, Pst) RNA-based sequencing (RNA-Seq) has proved particularly valuable, overcoming the barriers associated with its obligate biotrophic nature. This includes the application of RNA-Seq approaches to study Pst and wheat gene expression dynamics over time and the Pst population composition through the use of a novel RNA-Seq based surveillance approach called "field pathogenomics". As a dual RNA-Seq approach, the field pathogenomics technique also provides gene expression data from the host, giving new insight into host responses. However, this has created a wealth of data for interrogation. RESULTS: Here, we used the field pathogenomics approach to generate 538 new RNA-Seq datasets from Pst-infected field wheat samples, doubling the amount of transcriptomics data available for this important pathosystem. We then analysed these datasets alongside 66 RNA-Seq datasets from four Pst infection time-courses and 420 Pst-infected plant field and laboratory samples that were publicly available. A database of gene expression values for Pst and wheat was generated for each of these 1024 RNA-Seq datasets and incorporated into the development of the rust expression browser ( http://www.rust-expression.com ). This enables for the first time simultaneous 'point-and-click' access to gene expression profiles for Pst and its wheat host and represents the largest database of processed RNA-Seq datasets available for any of the three Puccinia wheat rust pathogens. We also demonstrated the utility of the browser through investigation of expression of putative Pst virulence genes over time and examined the host plants response to Pst infection. CONCLUSIONS: The rust expression browser offers immense value to the wider community, facilitating data sharing and transparency and the underlying database can be continually expanded as more datasets become publicly available.
BACKGROUND: Transcriptomics is being increasingly applied to generate new insight into the interactions between plants and their pathogens. For the wheat yellow (stripe) rust pathogen (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, Pst) RNA-based sequencing (RNA-Seq) has proved particularly valuable, overcoming the barriers associated with its obligate biotrophic nature. This includes the application of RNA-Seq approaches to study Pst and wheat gene expression dynamics over time and the Pst population composition through the use of a novel RNA-Seq based surveillance approach called "field pathogenomics". As a dual RNA-Seq approach, the field pathogenomics technique also provides gene expression data from the host, giving new insight into host responses. However, this has created a wealth of data for interrogation. RESULTS: Here, we used the field pathogenomics approach to generate 538 new RNA-Seq datasets from Pst-infected field wheat samples, doubling the amount of transcriptomics data available for this important pathosystem. We then analysed these datasets alongside 66 RNA-Seq datasets from four Pst infection time-courses and 420 Pst-infected plant field and laboratory samples that were publicly available. A database of gene expression values for Pst and wheat was generated for each of these 1024 RNA-Seq datasets and incorporated into the development of the rust expression browser ( http://www.rust-expression.com ). This enables for the first time simultaneous 'point-and-click' access to gene expression profiles for Pst and its wheat host and represents the largest database of processed RNA-Seq datasets available for any of the three Puccinia wheat rust pathogens. We also demonstrated the utility of the browser through investigation of expression of putative Pst virulence genes over time and examined the host plants response to Pst infection. CONCLUSIONS: The rust expression browser offers immense value to the wider community, facilitating data sharing and transparency and the underlying database can be continually expanded as more datasets become publicly available.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gene expression browser; Open science; Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici; RNA-Seq; Transcriptomics; Wheat yellow rust; expVIP
Authors: Sébastien Duplessis; Christina A Cuomo; Yao-Cheng Lin; Andrea Aerts; Emilie Tisserant; Claire Veneault-Fourrey; David L Joly; Stéphane Hacquard; Joëlle Amselem; Brandi L Cantarel; Readman Chiu; Pedro M Coutinho; Nicolas Feau; Matthew Field; Pascal Frey; Eric Gelhaye; Jonathan Goldberg; Manfred G Grabherr; Chinnappa D Kodira; Annegret Kohler; Ursula Kües; Erika A Lindquist; Susan M Lucas; Rohit Mago; Evan Mauceli; Emmanuelle Morin; Claude Murat; Jasmyn L Pangilinan; Robert Park; Matthew Pearson; Hadi Quesneville; Nicolas Rouhier; Sharadha Sakthikumar; Asaf A Salamov; Jeremy Schmutz; Benjamin Selles; Harris Shapiro; Philippe Tanguay; Gerald A Tuskan; Bernard Henrissat; Yves Van de Peer; Pierre Rouzé; Jeffrey G Ellis; Peter N Dodds; Jacqueline E Schein; Shaobin Zhong; Richard C Hamelin; Igor V Grigoriev; Les J Szabo; Francis Martin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-05-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dario Cantu; Manjula Govindarajulu; Alex Kozik; Meinan Wang; Xianming Chen; Kenji K Kojima; Jerzy Jurka; Richard W Michelmore; Jorge Dubcovsky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amelia Hubbard; Clare M Lewis; Kentaro Yoshida; Ricardo H Ramirez-Gonzalez; Claude de Vallavieille-Pope; Jane Thomas; Sophien Kamoun; Rosemary Bayles; Cristobal Uauy; Diane G O Saunders Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Eric Yao; Victoria C Blake; Laurel Cooper; Charlene P Wight; Steve Michel; H Busra Cagirici; Gerard R Lazo; Clay L Birkett; David J Waring; Jean-Luc Jannink; Ian Holmes; Amanda J Waters; David P Eickholt; Taner Z Sen Journal: Database (Oxford) Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 4.462
Authors: Laura Bouvet; Lawrence Percival-Alwyn; Simon Berry; Paul Fenwick; Camila Campos Mantello; Rajiv Sharma; Sarah Holdgate; Ian J Mackay; James Cockram Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2021-11-27 Impact factor: 5.699
Authors: Laura Bouvet; Sarah Holdgate; Lucy James; Jane Thomas; Ian J Mackay; James Cockram Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 5.574