Literature DB >> 33749299

The psycholinguistic and affective processing of framed health messages among younger and older adults.

Xiaomei Liu1, Joseph A Mikels2, Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow1.   

Abstract

How health-related messages are framed can impact their effectiveness in promoting behaviors, and messages framed in terms of gains have been shown to be more effective among older adults. Recent findings have suggested that the affective response to framed messages can contribute to these effects. However, the impact of demands associated with psycholinguistic processing for different frames is not well understood. In this study, exercise-related messages were gain or loss framed and with a focus on either desirable or undesirable outcomes. Participants read these messages while their eye movements were monitored and then provided affective ratings. Older adults reacted less negatively than younger adults to loss-framed messages and messages focusing on undesirable outcomes. Eye-movement measures indicated both younger and older adults had difficulty processing the most complex messages (loss-framed messages focused on avoiding desirable outcomes). When gain-framed messages were easily processed, they engendered more positive affect, which in turn, was related to better recall. These results suggest that affective and cognitive mechanisms are interdependent in comprehension of framed messages for younger and older adults. An implication for translation to effective health communication is that simpler message framing engenders a positive reaction, which in turn supports memory for that information, regardless of age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33749299      PMCID: PMC8554681          DOI: 10.1037/xap0000285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  33 in total

1.  Getting the message across: age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages.

Authors:  Andrea M Shamaskin; Joseph A Mikels; Andrew E Reed
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood.

Authors:  Susan Turk Charles
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Aging and self-regulated language processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Aging and situation model processing.

Authors:  Gabrel A Radvansky; Katinka Dijkstra
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

6.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

7.  Selective Engagement of Cognitive Resources: Motivational Influences on Older Adults' Cognitive Functioning.

Authors:  Thomas M Hess
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-07

Review 8.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; G A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 9.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing.

Authors:  A J Rothman; P Salovey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Messages that matter: Age differences in affective responses to framed health messages.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Michael M Shuster; Sydney T Thai; Renae Smith-Ray; Christian E Waugh; Kayla Roth; Alexis Keilly; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.