Literature DB >> 33749134

Distinguishing between recent balancing selection and incomplete sweep using deep neural networks.

Ulas Isildak1, Alessandro Stella2, Matteo Fumagalli3.   

Abstract

Balancing selection is an important adaptive mechanism underpinning a wide range of phenotypes. Despite its relevance, the detection of recent balancing selection from genomic data is challenging as its signatures are qualitatively similar to those left by ongoing positive selection. In this study, we developed and implemented two deep neural networks and tested their performance to predict loci under recent selection, either due to balancing selection or incomplete sweep, from population genomic data. Specifically, we generated forward-in-time simulations to train and test an artificial neural network (ANN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN). ANN received as input multiple summary statistics calculated on the locus of interest, while CNN was applied directly on the matrix of haplotypes. We found that both architectures have high accuracy to identify loci under recent selection. CNN generally outperformed ANN to distinguish between signals of balancing selection and incomplete sweep and was less affected by incorrect training data. We deployed both trained networks on neutral genomic regions in European populations and demonstrated a lower false-positive rate for CNN than ANN. We finally deployed CNN within the MEFV gene region and identified several common variants predicted to be under incomplete sweep in a European population. Notably, two of these variants are functional changes and could modulate susceptibility to familial Mediterranean fever, possibly as a consequence of past adaptation to pathogens. In conclusion, deep neural networks were able to characterize signals of selection on intermediate frequency variants, an analysis currently inaccessible by commonly used strategies.
© 2021 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; genomics/proteomics; molecular evolution; natural selection and contemporary evolution; population genetics-empirical; population genetics-theoretical

Year:  2021        PMID: 33749134     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evolution in small steps and giant leaps.

Authors:  Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  BalLeRMix+: Mixture model approaches for robust joint identification of both positive selection and long-term balancing selection.

Authors:  Xiaoheng Cheng; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  A Study of the Recent Trends of Immunology: Key Challenges, Domains, Applications, Datasets, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sharnil Pandya; Aanchal Thakur; Santosh Saxena; Nandita Jassal; Chirag Patel; Kirit Modi; Pooja Shah; Rahul Joshi; Sudhanshu Gonge; Kalyani Kadam; Prachi Kadam
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Understanding the Adaptive Evolutionary Histories of South American Ancient and Present-Day Populations via Genomics.

Authors:  John Lindo; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.