Background: IBM's Watson for Oncology (WFO) is an artificial intelligence tool that trains by acquiring data from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and learns from test cases and experts. This study aimed to analyze the adequacy and effectiveness of WFO in determining the treatment method for patients with thyroid carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 50 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent surgery in 2018 and entered their clinical data into WFO. The WFO treatment recommendations were compared with the surgical procedures and recommended treatments performed according to the Korean Thyroid Endocrine Surgery Association guidelines. Results: The overall concordance rate between WFO-recommended treatments and actual surgical treatments was 48%, and for patients with stage I, II, and III disease, these rates were 52.4, 50, and 16.7%, respectively. A lower concordance rate was observed with respect to treatment for advanced thyroid cancer. Conclusion: WFO is a useful clinical aid but must be used with caution. A surgeon's decision takes precedence over WFO recommendations in the treatment of advanced thyroid cancer.
Background: IBM's Watson for Oncology (WFO) is an artificial intelligence tool that trains by acquiring data from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and learns from test cases and experts. This study aimed to analyze the adequacy and effectiveness of WFO in determining the treatment method for patients with thyroid carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 50 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent surgery in 2018 and entered their clinical data into WFO. The WFO treatment recommendations were compared with the surgical procedures and recommended treatments performed according to the Korean Thyroid Endocrine Surgery Association guidelines. Results: The overall concordance rate between WFO-recommended treatments and actual surgical treatments was 48%, and for patients with stage I, II, and III disease, these rates were 52.4, 50, and 16.7%, respectively. A lower concordance rate was observed with respect to treatment for advanced thyroid cancer. Conclusion: WFO is a useful clinical aid but must be used with caution. A surgeon's decision takes precedence over WFO recommendations in the treatment of advanced thyroid cancer.
Authors: Reid F Thompson; Gilmer Valdes; Clifton D Fuller; Colin M Carpenter; Olivier Morin; Sanjay Aneja; William D Lindsay; Hugo J W L Aerts; Barbara Agrimson; Curtiland Deville; Seth A Rosenthal; James B Yu; Charles R Thomas Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: S P Somashekhar; M-J Sepúlveda; S Puglielli; A D Norden; E H Shortliffe; C Rohit Kumar; A Rauthan; N Arun Kumar; P Patil; K Rhee; Y Ramya Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Carlo La Vecchia; Matteo Malvezzi; Cristina Bosetti; Werner Garavello; Paola Bertuccio; Fabio Levi; Eva Negri Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 7.396