| Literature DB >> 33746568 |
Ramesh Neupane1, Anup K C2,3, Manoj Aryal4, Kedar Rijal1.
Abstract
This study was conducted with an aim to assess the status of ecotourism in terms of tourism demand, tourist characteristics, and strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat (SWOT) analysis. For this, the study was conducted in Bhadaure-Tamagi village of the Panchase Protected Forest Area of Gandaki Province, which was planned to be developed as an important tourist destination for tourists visiting Pokhara because of its cultural and natural importance. Mixed-method research approach was implemented in this research for data collection and analysis. One hundred and twenty-two tourism stakeholders (30 hoteliers, 40 homestay owners, and 52 tourists) were surveyed for quantitative data collection and analysis along with seven key informant interviews (KII) for qualitative data collection and analysis. It was observed that the current demand for accommodation facilities in the Bhadaure-Tamagi village was 23,390 bed nights per annum. The tourism demand in terms of tourism revenues estimated through this study amounted to a total of US$10,763.67 per year. The occupancy rate of accommodation facilities at Bhadaure-Tamagi village was a mere 20%, which is well below the national and international average. Despite outstanding ecotourism opportunities and a necessary regulatory framework in place, the SWOT analysis revealed that the tourism sector development is not satisfactory. In the current situation, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) had adversely affected the ecotourism in the area. So, tourism promotional activities need to be focused by following appropriate health, hygiene, and safety measures.Entities:
Keywords: Accommodation capacity; Ecotourism; Panchase; SWOT analysis; Tourism demand
Year: 2021 PMID: 33746568 PMCID: PMC7959276 DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01317-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Dev Sustain ISSN: 1387-585X Impact factor: 3.219
Fig. 1Location map of study site
Fig. 2Three-dimensional SWOT analysis (Collins-Kreiner & Wall, 2007)
Fig. 3Minimum tourism demand of different places of Bhadaure-Tamagi village
Fig. 4Maximum accommodation capacity of Bhadaure-Tamagi village
Relationship between Maximum Accommodation Capacity and Minimum Tourism Demand
| Year | No. of Tourists | No. of beds available |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 17,200 | 44 |
| 2012 | 19,000 | 94 |
| 2013 | 21,100 | 97 |
Source: Tourism Office, Pokhara &(2014)
Fig. 5Foreign tourist composition by continent of origin (in %)
Fig. 6Average length of stay of foreign tourists by gender
Fig. 7Number and percentage share of spending per trip of foreign tourists
Fig. 8Foreign tourist composition (in %) by age groups (in years)
Fig. 9Number of foreign tourists by occupation
Fig. 10Number of Foreign Tourists by Season of Preference
SWOT analysis of ecotourism at national level
| Strengths | Weaknesses | Opportunities | Threats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Himalayan range including eight out of ten highest mountains of the world (Joshi, | Poor integration between ecotourism and biodiversity conservation initiatives (KII participants) | Employment generation (Bhattarai et al., | International and national conflicts (Thapa, |
| Panoramic landscape (Dahal, | Ecotourism not featured in any government policy till now (Regmi & Walter, | Foreign exchange earnings (Dhakal, | International financial crisis events like global economic recession of 2008 |
| Adventurous trekking routes (K C et al., | Tourism infrastructure deficit (Dhungana, | Preservation and promotion of tradition and culture (Panta & Thapa, | Unstable political situations like strikes and riots |
| Protected areas including World Heritage Sites (Neupane et al., | Tourism industry vulnerable to climatic and socio-economic factors (K C & Thapa Parajuli, | Economic benefit to grass-root level (Dhakal, | Invasion of local culture and traditions |
| Tourism development-oriented plans, policies, and initiatives | Inadequate direct air connectivity with international tourism markets | Cultural exchange and interactions between nations (K C et al., | Solid waste disposal and pollution issue (Dhakal, |
| Unique social cohesion and cultural identity (Acharya & Halpenny, | Resource depletion |
SWOT analysis of ecotourism at regional level
| Strength | Weakness | Opportunities | Threat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endowment fund for local development and conservation (Jones, | Weak revenue leakage control response (Jones, | Rise in socio-economic status (Bhusal, | Frequency of incidence of missing tourists |
| Distinctive tourism products (Acharya & Halpenny, | Inadequate disaster preparedness, rescue and mitigation measures (Ghimre, | Improvement in accessibility | Tourism revenue leakage (Jones, |
| World-famous trekking routes (K C, | Lack of proper planning in development of large infrastructure projects (Nepal Economic Forum, | Pollution and ecological disruption | |
| Largest number of accommodation enterprises in the country (Sedai, |
SWOT analysis of ecotourism at local level
| Strengths | Weakness | Opportunities | Threats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proximity to a national tourist hub-Pokhara and ACA | Inadequate rural tourism management (Upadhyay, | Local employment generation through medium and small enterprises (IUCN, | High resource consumption (Dixit et al., |
| Number of trekking routes present (K C, | Lack of quality accommodation facilities (IUCN, | Attraction for ecotourism, adventure tourism and rural tourism (Upadhyay, | Haphazard infrastructure development (Dixit et al., |
| Unique Gurung culture (K C et al., | Weak implementation of anti-poaching laws | Utilization of local resources | Out-migration of indigenous population (IUCN, |
| Panoramic Himalayan and mountain range | Diversification of livelihood options (Adhikari et al., | Health and sanitation issues (IUCN, | |
| Cultural and religious sites (Nepal Economic Forum, | Waste management issues (Dahal et al., | ||
| Rich in biodiversity (Sharma et al., |