Run-Bin Liang1, Peng Li2, Bob T Li3, Jie-Tian Jin2, Valerie W Rusch4, David R Jones4, Yi-Long Wu5, Qing Liu6, Jie Yang7, Mu-Zi Yang8, Shuo Li1, Hao Long1, Jian-Hua Fu1, Lan-Jun Zhang1, Peng Lin1, Tie-Hua Rong1, Xue Hou9, Su-Xia Lin2, Hao-Xian Yang10. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. 3. Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 4. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 5. Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. 7. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. 8. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. 9. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. 10. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. Electronic address: yanghx@sysucc.org.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) with PL1 or PL2 increases the T classification from T1 to T2 in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) ≤ 3 cm. We proposed a modified T classification based on VPI to guide adjuvant therapy. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is it reasonable to upstage PL1-positive cases from T1 to T2 for NSCLCs ≤ 3 cm? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In total, 1,055 patients with resected NSCLC were retrospectively included. Tumor sections were restained with hematoxylin and eosin stain and Victoria blue elastic stain for the elastic layer. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to further determine the impact of VPI on survival. RESULTS: The extent of VPI was diagnosed as PL0 in 824 patients, PL1 in 133 patients, and PL2 in 98 patients. The 5-year DFS rates of patients with PL0, PL1, and PL2 were 62.6%, 60.2%, and 28.8% (P < .01), whereas the corresponding 5-year OS rates were 78.6%, 74.4%, and 50.0% (P < .01), respectively. As predicted, the DFS and OS of patients with PL2 were much worse than those of patients with PL0 (P < .01) and PL1 (P < .01). However, both the DFS and OS of patients with PL0 and PL1 were comparable (DFS: P = .198; OS: P = .150). For node-negative cases, the DFS and OS of patients with PL0 and PL1 were also comparable (DFS: P = .468; OS: P = .388), but patients with PL2 had much worse DFS and OS than patients with PL0 (P < .01) and PL1 (P < .01). Multivariable analyses suggested that PL2, together with node positivity and poor cell differentiation, was an independent adverse prognostic factor. INTERPRETATION: In NSCLCs ≤ 3 cm, tumors with PL1 should remain defined as T1, not T2. Overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative NSCLCs ≤ 3 cm might be avoided in PL1 cases.
BACKGROUND: Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) with PL1 or PL2 increases the T classification from T1 to T2 in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) ≤ 3 cm. We proposed a modified T classification based on VPI to guide adjuvant therapy. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is it reasonable to upstage PL1-positive cases from T1 to T2 for NSCLCs ≤ 3 cm? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In total, 1,055 patients with resected NSCLC were retrospectively included. Tumor sections were restained with hematoxylin and eosin stain and Victoria blue elastic stain for the elastic layer. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to further determine the impact of VPI on survival. RESULTS: The extent of VPI was diagnosed as PL0 in 824 patients, PL1 in 133 patients, and PL2 in 98 patients. The 5-year DFS rates of patients with PL0, PL1, and PL2 were 62.6%, 60.2%, and 28.8% (P < .01), whereas the corresponding 5-year OS rates were 78.6%, 74.4%, and 50.0% (P < .01), respectively. As predicted, the DFS and OS of patients with PL2 were much worse than those of patients with PL0 (P < .01) and PL1 (P < .01). However, both the DFS and OS of patients with PL0 and PL1 were comparable (DFS: P = .198; OS: P = .150). For node-negative cases, the DFS and OS of patients with PL0 and PL1 were also comparable (DFS: P = .468; OS: P = .388), but patients with PL2 had much worse DFS and OS than patients with PL0 (P < .01) and PL1 (P < .01). Multivariable analyses suggested that PL2, together with node positivity and poor cell differentiation, was an independent adverse prognostic factor. INTERPRETATION: In NSCLCs ≤ 3 cm, tumors with PL1 should remain defined as T1, not T2. Overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative NSCLCs ≤ 3 cm might be avoided in PL1 cases.
Authors: Ramón Rami-Porta; Vanessa Bolejack; John Crowley; David Ball; Jhingook Kim; Gustavo Lyons; Thomas Rice; Kenji Suzuki; Charles F Thomas; William D Travis; Yi-Long Wu Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Mark G Kris; Laurie E Gaspar; Jamie E Chaft; Erin B Kennedy; Christopher G Azzoli; Peter M Ellis; Steven H Lin; Harvey I Pass; Rahul Seth; Frances A Shepherd; David R Spigel; John R Strawn; Yee C Ung; Michael Weyant Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: William D Travis; Elisabeth Brambilla; Ramon Rami-Porta; Eric Vallières; Masahiro Tsuboi; Valerie Rusch; Peter Goldstraw Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 15.609