Literature DB >> 33745079

Regorafenib versus cabozantinb as second-line treatment after sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis.

Andrea Casadei-Gardini1,2, Lorenza Rimassa3,4, Margherita Rimini5, Changhoon Yoo6, Baek-Yeol Ryoo6, Sara Lonardi7,8, Gianluca Masi9,10, Hyung-Don Kim6, Caterina Vivaldi9,10, Min-Hee Ryu6, Mario Domenico Rizzato8, Francesca Salani9,10, Yeonghak Bang6, Antonio Pellino8,11, Silvia Catanese9,10, Valentina Burgio12, Stefano Cascinu13,12, Alessandro Cucchetti14,15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, three published phase III trials highlighted the superiority of investigational drugs compared to placebo, thus leading to their approval in the second-line setting. We report here a MAIC of second-line MKI options for patients with HCC previously treated with sorafenib using individual real-world data of regorafenib and aggregate data of second-line cabozantinib from the CELESTIAL trial.
METHODS: Data from 278 patients who received regorafenib as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure for unresectable HCC were used as IPD. Data inclusion were adapted to those reported in the CELESTIAL trial in the subset of patients who received sorafenib as the only prior therapy. Survival medians and rates were obtained from Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences between regorafenib and cabozantinib groups were explored through Cox regression adjusted for weights originating from MAIC.
RESULTS: The median OS of the weighted regorafenib group was 11.1 months (IQR: 5.6-16.4) and 11.3 (IQR: 6.7-22.4) for cabozantinib; HR 0.83 (95%CI 0.62-1.09). The median PFS of the weighted regorafenib group was 3.0 months (IQR: 1.9-4.8) and 5.5 (IQR: 2.3-9.3) for cabozantinib; HR 0.50 (95%CI 0.41-0.62). In the subgroup who received prior sorafenib for < 3 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 6.5 months (IQR: 4.7-10.9) and 9.5 months (IQR: 5.9-18.2) for cabozantinib; HR 0.68 (95%CI 0.39-1.16). In the subgroup receiving prior sorafenib for 3 to < 6 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 8.0 months (IQR: 4.2-15.2) and 11.5 (IQR: 6.5-23.9) for cabozantinib; HR 0.66 (95%CI 0.42-1.02). In the subgroup receiving prior sorafenib for ≥ 6 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 13.4 (IQR: 8.1-46.5) and 12.3 (IQR: 6.6-22.9) for cabozantinib; HR 0.89 (95%CI 0.52-1.51).
CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed no differences between regorafenib and cabozantinib in terms of OS. However, in earlier progressors on prior sorafenib a larger benefit might be expected from cabozantinib treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CELESTIAL; Cabozantinib; Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Indirect treatment comparison; Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC); RESORCE; Regorafenib; Second-line; Systemic therapy; Targeted therapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33745079     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03602-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  1 in total

1.  Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  James E Signorovitch; Vanja Sikirica; M Haim Erder; Jipan Xie; Mei Lu; Paul S Hodgkins; Keith A Betts; Eric Q Wu
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Identification of Regorafenib Prognostic Index (REP Index) via Recursive Partitioning Analysis in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Systemic Treatment: A Real-World Multi-Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Margherita Rimini; Changhoon Yoo; Sara Lonardi; Gianluca Masi; Alessandro Granito; Yeonghak Bang; Mario Domenico Rizzato; Caterina Vivaldi; Luca Ielasi; Hyung-Don Kim; Francesca Bergamo; Francesca Salani; Simona Leoni; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Min-Hee Ryoo; Valentina Burgio; Stefano Cascinu; Andrea Casadei-Gardini
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with sorafenib and regorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-center study in China.

Authors:  Shao-Hua Ren; Zi-Lin Cui; Meng-Ran Lang; Qiang Li; Wei Zhang; Feng Fang; Qiang Wu; Yun-Long Cui; Hui-Kai Li; Ping Chen; Yamin Zhang; Tianqiang Song
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

3.  Real-world efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in Korean patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yeong Hak Bang; Choong-Kun Lee; Changhoon Yoo; Hong Jae Chon; Moonki Hong; Beodeul Kang; Hyung-Don Kim; Sook Ryun Park; Won-Mook Choi; Jonggi Choi; Danbi Lee; Ju Hyun Shim; Kang Mo Kim; Young-Suk Lim; Han Chu Lee; Min-Hee Ryu; Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 5.485

4.  Second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with regorafenib or cabozantinib: Multicenter French clinical experience in real-life after matching.

Authors:  Xavier Adhoute; Marie De Matharel; Laurent Mineur; Guillaume Pénaranda; Dann Ouizeman; Clemence Toullec; Albert Tran; Paul Castellani; Armelle Rollet; Valérie Oules; Hervé Perrier; Si Nafa Si Ahmed; Marc Bourliere; Rodolphe Anty
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.