Yoshifumi Noda1,2, Toru Tochigi1,3, Anushri Parakh1, Evita Joseph1, Peter F Hahn1, Avinash Kambadakone4. 1. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan. 3. Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, 260-8670, Japan. 4. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. akambadakone@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a proposed pancreatic protocol CT generated from portal-venous phase (PVP) dual-energy CT (DECT) acquisition and its impact on image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement. METHODS: We included 111 patients (mean age, 66.8 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol DECT (pancreatic phase, PP, and PVP). The original DECT acquisition was used to create two data sets-standard protocol (50 keV PP/65 keV PVP) and proposed protocol (40 keV/65 keV PVP). Three reviewers evaluated the two data sets for image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement using a 5-point scale. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of pancreas and lesion-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Qualitative scores, quantitative parameters, and dose-length product (DLP) were compared between standard and proposed protocols. RESULTS: The image quality, SNR of pancreas, and lesion-to-pancreas CNR of the standard and proposed protocol were comparable (p = 0.11-1.00). Lesion conspicuity was comparable between the standard and proposed protocols for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (p = 0.55) and pancreatic cysts (p = 0.28). The visualization of larger arteries and arterial involvement were comparable between the two protocols (p = 0.056-1.00) while the scores were higher for smaller vessels in the standard protocol (p < 0.0001-0.0015). DLP of the proposed protocol (670.4 mGy·cm) showed a projected 42% reduction than the standard protocol (1145.9 mGy·cm) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic protocol CT generated from a single PVP DECT acquisition is feasible and could potentially be an alternative to the standard pancreatic protocol with PP and PVP. KEY POINTS: • The lesion conspicuity for focal pancreatic lesions was comparable between the proposed protocol and standard dual-phase pancreatic protocol CT. • Qualitative and quantitative image assessments were almost comparable between two protocols. • The radiation dose of a proposed protocol showed a projected 42% reduction from the conventional protocol.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a proposed pancreatic protocol CT generated from portal-venous phase (PVP) dual-energy CT (DECT) acquisition and its impact on image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement. METHODS: We included 111 patients (mean age, 66.8 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol DECT (pancreatic phase, PP, and PVP). The original DECT acquisition was used to create two data sets-standard protocol (50 keV PP/65 keV PVP) and proposed protocol (40 keV/65 keV PVP). Three reviewers evaluated the two data sets for image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement using a 5-point scale. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of pancreas and lesion-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Qualitative scores, quantitative parameters, and dose-length product (DLP) were compared between standard and proposed protocols. RESULTS: The image quality, SNR of pancreas, and lesion-to-pancreas CNR of the standard and proposed protocol were comparable (p = 0.11-1.00). Lesion conspicuity was comparable between the standard and proposed protocols for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (p = 0.55) and pancreatic cysts (p = 0.28). The visualization of larger arteries and arterial involvement were comparable between the two protocols (p = 0.056-1.00) while the scores were higher for smaller vessels in the standard protocol (p < 0.0001-0.0015). DLP of the proposed protocol (670.4 mGy·cm) showed a projected 42% reduction than the standard protocol (1145.9 mGy·cm) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic protocol CT generated from a single PVP DECT acquisition is feasible and could potentially be an alternative to the standard pancreatic protocol with PP and PVP. KEY POINTS: • The lesion conspicuity for focal pancreatic lesions was comparable between the proposed protocol and standard dual-phase pancreatic protocol CT. • Qualitative and quantitative image assessments were almost comparable between two protocols. • The radiation dose of a proposed protocol showed a projected 42% reduction from the conventional protocol.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer screening; Multidetector-row computed tomography; Pancreatic neoplasms; Radiation dosage
Authors: Hanna Muenzfeld; Samy Mahjoub; Robert Roehle; Uwe Pelzer; Marcus Bahra; Georg Boening; Bernd Hamm; Dominik Geisel; Timo Alexander Auer Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Eric P Tamm; Evelyne M Loyer; Silvana C Faria; Douglas B Evans; Robert A Wolff; Chusilp Charnsangavej Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2007 Sep-Oct