Literature DB >> 33743816

The effect of silica desiccation under different storage conditions on filter-immobilized environmental DNA.

Michael J Allison1, Jessica M Round1, Lauren C Bergman1, Ali Mirabzadeh2, Heather Allen2, Aron Weir3, Caren C Helbing4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Silica gel beads have promise as a non-toxic, cost-effective, portable method for storing environmental DNA (eDNA) immobilized on filter membranes. Consequently, many ecological surveys are turning to silica bead filter desiccation rather than ethanol preservation. However, no systematic evaluation of silica bead storage conditions or duration past 1 week has been published. The present study evaluates the quality of filter-immobilized eDNA desiccated with silica gel under different storage conditions for over a year using targeted quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assays.
RESULTS: While the detection of relatively abundant eDNA target was stable over 15 months from either ethanol- or silica gel-preserved filters at - 20 and 4 °C, silica gel out-performed ethanol preservation at 23 °C by preventing a progressive decrease in eDNA sample quality. Silica gel filter desiccation preserved low abundance eDNA equally well up to 1 month regardless of storage temperature (18, 4, or - 20 °C). However only storage at - 20 °C prevented a noticeable decrease in detectability at 5 and 12 months. The results indicate that brief storage of eDNA filters with silica gel beads up to 1 month can be successfully accomplished at a range of temperatures. However, longer-term storage should be at - 20 °C to maximize sample integrity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental DNA; Ethanol; Filter; Long-term storage; Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction; Silica gel beads; Storage conditions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33743816      PMCID: PMC7981917          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05530-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


  9 in total

1.  Environmental DNA.

Authors:  Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  eDNA as a tool for identifying freshwater species in sustainable forestry: A critical review and potential future applications.

Authors:  Ashley A Coble; Camille A Flinders; Jessica A Homyack; Brooke E Penaluna; Richard C Cronn; Kevin Weitemier
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.

Authors:  Kristy Deiner; Holly M Bik; Elvira Mächler; Mathew Seymour; Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel; Florian Altermatt; Simon Creer; Iliana Bista; David M Lodge; Natasha de Vere; Michael E Pfrender; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Filtration recovery of extracellular DNA from environmental water samples.

Authors:  Zhanbei Liang; Ann Keeley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders.

Authors:  Caren S Goldberg; David S Pilliod; Robert S Arkle; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Implementation of Novel Design Features for qPCR-Based eDNA Assessment.

Authors:  Nik Veldhoen; Jared Hobbs; Georgios Ikonomou; Michael Hii; Mary Lesperance; Caren C Helbing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expansion of the known distribution of the coastal tailed frog, Ascaphus truei, in British Columbia, Canada, using robust eDNA detection methods.

Authors:  Jared Hobbs; Jessica M Round; Michael J Allison; Caren C Helbing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction.

Authors:  Mark A Renshaw; Brett P Olds; Christopher L Jerde; Margaret M McVeigh; David M Lodge
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 7.090

9.  Environmental DNA filtration techniques affect recovered biodiversity.

Authors:  Markus Majaneva; Ola H Diserud; Shannon H C Eagle; Erik Boström; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Torbjørn Ekrem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.