Caroline J Jagtenberg1,2, Maaike A J Vollebergh3, Oddvar Uleberg4,5, Jo Røislien4,6. 1. School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.j.jagtenberg@vu.nl. 2. Faculty of Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. c.j.jagtenberg@vu.nl. 3. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics & Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Research, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Bergen, Norway. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine and Pre-Hospital Services, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 6. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A primary task of the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) is to provide advanced medical care to the critical ill and injured outside of hospitals. Where HEMS bases are located, directly influences who in the population can be reached within a given response time threshold and who cannot. When studying the locations of bases, the focus is often on efficiency, that is, maximizing the total number of people that can be reached within a given set time. This approach is known to benefit people living in densely populated areas, such as cities, over people living in remote areas. The most efficient solution is thus typically not necessarily a fair one. This study aims to incorporate fairness in finding optimal air ambulance base locations. METHODS: We solve multiple advanced mathematical optimization models to determine optimal helicopter base locations, with different optimization criteria related to the level of aversion to inequality, including the utilitarian, Bernoulli-Nash and iso-elastic social welfare functions. This is the first study to use the latter social welfare function for HEMS. RESULTS: Focusing on efficiency, a utilitarian objective function focuses on covering the larger cities in Norway, leaving parts of Norway largely uncovered. Including fairness by rather using an iso-elastic social welfare function in the optimization avoids leaving whole areas uncovered and in particular increases service levels in the north of Norway. CONCLUSIONS: Including fairness in determining optimal HEMS base locations has great impact on population coverage, in particular when the number of base locations is not enough to give full coverage of the country. As results differ depending on the mathematical objective, the work shows the importance of not only looking for optimal solutions, but also raising the essential question of 'optimal with respect to what'.
BACKGROUND: A primary task of the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) is to provide advanced medical care to the critical ill and injured outside of hospitals. Where HEMS bases are located, directly influences who in the population can be reached within a given response time threshold and who cannot. When studying the locations of bases, the focus is often on efficiency, that is, maximizing the total number of people that can be reached within a given set time. This approach is known to benefit people living in densely populated areas, such as cities, over people living in remote areas. The most efficient solution is thus typically not necessarily a fair one. This study aims to incorporate fairness in finding optimal air ambulance base locations. METHODS: We solve multiple advanced mathematical optimization models to determine optimal helicopter base locations, with different optimization criteria related to the level of aversion to inequality, including the utilitarian, Bernoulli-Nash and iso-elastic social welfare functions. This is the first study to use the latter social welfare function for HEMS. RESULTS: Focusing on efficiency, a utilitarian objective function focuses on covering the larger cities in Norway, leaving parts of Norway largely uncovered. Including fairness by rather using an iso-elastic social welfare function in the optimization avoids leaving whole areas uncovered and in particular increases service levels in the north of Norway. CONCLUSIONS: Including fairness in determining optimal HEMS base locations has great impact on population coverage, in particular when the number of base locations is not enough to give full coverage of the country. As results differ depending on the mathematical objective, the work shows the importance of not only looking for optimal solutions, but also raising the essential question of 'optimal with respect to what'.
Entities:
Keywords:
Air ambulance; Facility location problem; Fairness; HEMS
Authors: Colman B Taylor; Mark Stevenson; Stephen Jan; Bette Liu; Gary Tall; Paul M Middleton; Michael Fitzharris; John Myburgh Journal: Injury Date: 2011-04-03 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Hagen Andruszkow; Rolf Lefering; Michael Frink; Philipp Mommsen; Christian Zeckey; Katharina Rahe; Christian Krettek; Frank Hildebrand Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Jo Røislien; Pieter L van den Berg; Thomas Lindner; Erik Zakariassen; Karen Aardal; J Theresia van Essen Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 2.399
Authors: Jo Røislien; Pieter L van den Berg; Thomas Lindner; Erik Zakariassen; Oddvar Uleberg; Karen Aardal; J Theresia van Essen Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.953