Julija Simpson1, Tomos Robinson2, Luke Vale2. 1. Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. j.stoniute@newcastle.ac.uk. 2. Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Economic evaluations that include the patient perspective often base their estimates of patient time and travel costs on data collected at a single point in time. This, however, may be inaccurate if the costs of accessing care change substantially over time, as may be the case for young people in transition from paediatric to adult health services. AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the differences in these time and travel costs between two data collection points for young individuals in transition between health care services, and thus to provide an insight of whether such costs should be collected more than once. METHODS: Descriptive statistics and regression modelling were used to estimate the average difference in costs between the two points of data collection, as well as the potential drivers of those cost differences. RESULTS: We found a small difference in costs between the two time points, equal to -£45.78 [95% CI: - 89.70 to - 1.86]. The results were largely driven by changes in the unit cost of visits and in the number of attendances. CONCLUSIONS: A simple and common assumption that patient costs could be collected at a single time point cannot be made in the context of our study. When deciding on the frequency of elicitation of patient costs, future studies should consider the relative impacts of additional data collection on the estimates of efficiency, inequalities and resource implications for collecting new data.
BACKGROUND: Economic evaluations that include the patient perspective often base their estimates of patient time and travel costs on data collected at a single point in time. This, however, may be inaccurate if the costs of accessing care change substantially over time, as may be the case for young people in transition from paediatric to adult health services. AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the differences in these time and travel costs between two data collection points for young individuals in transition between health care services, and thus to provide an insight of whether such costs should be collected more than once. METHODS: Descriptive statistics and regression modelling were used to estimate the average difference in costs between the two points of data collection, as well as the potential drivers of those cost differences. RESULTS: We found a small difference in costs between the two time points, equal to -£45.78 [95% CI: - 89.70 to - 1.86]. The results were largely driven by changes in the unit cost of visits and in the number of attendances. CONCLUSIONS: A simple and common assumption that patient costs could be collected at a single time point cannot be made in the context of our study. When deciding on the frequency of elicitation of patient costs, future studies should consider the relative impacts of additional data collection on the estimates of efficiency, inequalities and resource implications for collecting new data.
Entities:
Keywords:
Economic evaluation; Health economics; Patient costs; Transition care
Authors: Sarah C Henderson; Hillary Owino; Kathleen C Thomas; Julianne M Cyr; Sana Ansari; Seth W Glickman; Stacie B Dusetzina Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2020-05
Authors: Maryam Oskoui; Carmen Messerlian; Alexandra Blair; Philippe Gamache; Michael Shevell Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Sue Jowett; Stirling Bryan; Isabelle Mahé; David Brieger; Jonas Carlsson; Bernt Kartman; Mark Nevinson Journal: Value Health Date: 2008 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Hanna Eklund; Tim Cadman; James Findon; Hannah Hayward; Deirdre Howley; Jennifer Beecham; Kiriakos Xenitidis; Declan Murphy; Philip Asherson; Karen Glaser Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 2.655