Literature DB >> 33743149

Screening for atrial fibrillation during automated blood pressure measurement among patients admitted to internal medicine ward.

Giacomo Pucci1,2,3, Edoardo Santoni4,5, Valeria Bisogni4,5, Camilla Calandri4,5, Alberto Cerasari4,5, Irene Dominioni4,5, Leandro Sanesi4,5, Marco D'Abbondanza4,5, Vito Veca4,5, Gaetano Vaudo4,5.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the commonest sustained cardiac arrhythmia affecting the adult population, is often casually discovered among hospitalized people. AF onset is indeed triggered by several clinical conditions such as acute inflammatory states, infections, and electrolyte disturbance, frequently occurring during the hospitalization. We aimed to evaluate whether systematic AF screening, performed through an automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) device (Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB, Microlife AG, Switzerland), is effective for detecting AF episodes in subjects admitted to an Internal Medicine ward. 163 patients consecutively hospitalized at the Unit of Internal Medicine of the "Santa Maria" Terni University Hospital between November 2019 and January 2020 (mean age ± standard deviation: 77 ± 14 years, men proportion: 40%) were examined. Simultaneously with BP measurement and AF screening, a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed in all subjects. AF was diagnosed by ECG in 29 patients (18%). AF screening showed overall 86% sensitivity and 96% specificity. False negatives (n = 4) had RR-interval coefficient of variation lower than true positives (n = 25, p < 0.01), suggesting a regular ventricular rhythm during AF. The repeated evaluation substantially confirmed the same level of agreement. AF screening was positive in all patients with new-onset AF (n = 6, 100%). Systematic AF screening in patients admitted to Internal Medicine wards, performed using the Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB, is feasible and effective. The opportunity to implement such technology in daily routine clinical practice to prevent undiagnosed AF episodes in hospitalized patients should be the subject of further research.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Blood pressure; Cardiovascular prevention; Internal medicine; Screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33743149     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02691-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  4 in total

1.  Atrial Fibrillation at an Internal Medicine Ward: Clinical and Prognostic Implications.

Authors:  Miriam Shteinshnaider; Dorit Almoznino-Sarafian; Irena Alon; Irma Tzur; Sylvia Berman; Natan Cohen; Oleg Gorelik
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 2.  Is pulse palpation helpful in detecting atrial fibrillation? A systematic review.

Authors:  Georga Cooke; Jenny Doust; Sharon Sanders
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  The PROFID project.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dagres; Niels Peek; Christophe Leclercq; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Increased risk of stroke and mortality following new-onset atrial fibrillation during hospitalization.

Authors:  Daniele Massera; Dan Wang; David A Vorchheimer; Abdissa Negassa; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.