Literature DB >> 33743147

Value of ultrafast and standard dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the presence and extension of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Erina Kato1, Naoko Mori2, Shunji Mugikura1,3, Satoko Sato4, Takanori Ishida5, Kei Takase1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrafast and standard dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI in evaluating the residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients underwent MRI after NAC. Visual analysis of enhancement was performed on ultrafast and standard DCE-MRI, and compared between no residual disease and residual disease groups. The lesion diameters measured on the last phase of ultrafast DCE-MRI and early and delayed phases of standard DCE-MRI were compared with pathological diameter of entire residual cancer and residual invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
RESULTS: The visual analysis in the delayed phase of standard DCE-MRI exhibited the highest sensitivity (90%), whereas ultrafast DCE-MRI revealed the highest positive predictive value (92%). There were no significant differences between the diameters in the delayed phase of the standard DCE-MRI and the pathological entire residual cancer (p = 0.97), and the diameters in ultrafast DCE-MRI and the pathological residual IDC (p = 0.97).
CONCLUSION: The delayed phase of standard DCE-MRI may be effective for detecting the residual disease and evaluating the extension of entire residual cancer. Enhancement in ultrafast DCE-MRI may be strongly suggestive of the presence of residual disease, and effective for evaluating the extension of residual IDC.
© 2021. Japan Radiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Ultrafast DCE-MRI

Year:  2021        PMID: 33743147     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-021-01110-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  2 in total

1.  Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens.

Authors:  Bita Behjatnia; Julie Sim; Lawrence W Bassett; Neda A Moatamed; Sophia K Apple
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-02-22

2.  Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  R Jeevan; D A Cromwell; M Trivella; G Lawrence; O Kearins; J Pereira; C Sheppard; C M Caddy; J H P van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-12
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating early response to radiosurgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Halil Özer; Merve Yazol; Nesrin Erdoğan; Ömer Hakan Emmez; Gökhan Kurt; Ali Yusuf Öner
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype.

Authors:  Maya Honda; Masako Kataoka; Mami Iima; Rie Ota; Akane Ohashi; Ayami Ohno Kishimoto; Kanae Kawai Miyake; Marcel Dominik Nickel; Yosuke Yamada; Masakazu Toi; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Predictive Value of Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Imaging Features in Breast Cancer Patients with Postoperative Recurrence Time.

Authors:  Zhangqiang Wu; Shaoli Gao; Yefeng Yao; Li Yi; Jianjun Wang; Fei Liu
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 1.621

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.