Joshua Bakhsheshian1, Ben A Strickland2, William J Mack2, Berislav V Zlokovic3. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. joshuabakh@gmail.com. 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, The Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: This study is a systematic review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate current in vivo techniques used in the investigation of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB). METHODS: Search of English language literature for animal studies that investigated the BSCB in vivo. Data extraction included animal model/type, protocol for BSCB evaluation, and study outcomes. Descriptive syntheses are provided. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies were included, which mainly investigated rodent models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) or spinal cord injury (SCI). The main techniques used were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intravital microscopy (IVM). MRI served as a reliable tool to longitudinally track BSCB permeability changes with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) using gadolinium, or assess inflammatory infiltrations with targeted alternative contrast agents. IVM provided high-resolution visualization of cellular and molecular interactions across the microvasculature, commonly with either epi-fluorescence or two-photon microscopy. MRI and IVM techniques enabled the evaluation of therapeutic interventions and mechanisms that drive spinal cord dysfunction in EAE and SCI. A small number of studies demonstrated the feasibility of DCE-computed tomography, ultrasound, bioluminescent, and fluorescent optical imaging methods to evaluate the BSCB. Technique-specific limitations and multiple protocols for image acquisition and data analyses are described for all techniques. CONCLUSION: There are few in vivo investigations of the BSCB. Additional studies are needed in less commonly studied spinal cord disorders, and to establish standardized protocols for data acquisition and analysis. Further development of techniques and multimodal approaches could overcome current imaging limitations to the spinal cord. These advancements might promote wider adoption of techniques, and can provide greater potential for clinical translation.
STUDY DESIGN: This study is a systematic review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate current in vivo techniques used in the investigation of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB). METHODS: Search of English language literature for animal studies that investigated the BSCB in vivo. Data extraction included animal model/type, protocol for BSCB evaluation, and study outcomes. Descriptive syntheses are provided. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies were included, which mainly investigated rodent models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) or spinal cord injury (SCI). The main techniques used were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intravital microscopy (IVM). MRI served as a reliable tool to longitudinally track BSCB permeability changes with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) using gadolinium, or assess inflammatory infiltrations with targeted alternative contrast agents. IVM provided high-resolution visualization of cellular and molecular interactions across the microvasculature, commonly with either epi-fluorescence or two-photon microscopy. MRI and IVM techniques enabled the evaluation of therapeutic interventions and mechanisms that drive spinal cord dysfunction in EAE and SCI. A small number of studies demonstrated the feasibility of DCE-computed tomography, ultrasound, bioluminescent, and fluorescent optical imaging methods to evaluate the BSCB. Technique-specific limitations and multiple protocols for image acquisition and data analyses are described for all techniques. CONCLUSION: There are few in vivo investigations of the BSCB. Additional studies are needed in less commonly studied spinal cord disorders, and to establish standardized protocols for data acquisition and analysis. Further development of techniques and multimodal approaches could overcome current imaging limitations to the spinal cord. These advancements might promote wider adoption of techniques, and can provide greater potential for clinical translation.
Authors: Sarah E Lutz; Julian R Smith; Dae Hwan Kim; Carl V L Olson; Kyle Ellefsen; Jennifer M Bates; Sunil P Gandhi; Dritan Agalliu Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Dimitrios Davalos; Jae Kyu Ryu; Mario Merlini; Kim M Baeten; Natacha Le Moan; Mark A Petersen; Thomas J Deerinck; Dimitri S Smirnoff; Catherine Bedard; Hiroyuki Hakozaki; Sara Gonias Murray; Jennie B Ling; Hans Lassmann; Jay L Degen; Mark H Ellisman; Katerina Akassoglou Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2012 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Dae Chul Suh; Soo Jeong; Yun Hyeok Choi; Su Min Cho; Su Young Yun; A Yeun Son; Young Min Lim; Boseong Kwon; Yunsun Song Journal: Neurointervention Date: 2022-06-15