Literature DB >> 33742022

Fine silt and clay content is the main factor defining maximal C and N accumulations in soils: a meta-analysis.

Francisco J Matus1,2.   

Abstract

When studying carbon (C) sequestration in soil, it is necessary to recognize the maximal storage potential and the main influencing factors, including the climate, land use, and soil properties. Here, we hypothesized that the silt and clay contents in soils as well as the clay mineralogy are the main factors affecting the maximal C and N storage levels of soils. This hypothesis was evaluated using a database containing the organic C contents of topsoils separated by ultrasonic dispersion to determine the particle size fractions. The slopes of the linear regressions between the C contents in silt and clay to the soil organic C (SOC) and between the N contents in silt and clay to the total N content were independent of the clay mineralogy (2:1, 1:1, calcareous soil, amorphous clays), climate type (tropical, temperate, and Mediterranean), and land use type (cropland, grassland, and forest). This clearly shows that the silt and clay content is the main factor defining an upper SOC level, which allowed us to propose a generalized linear regression (R2 > 0.95) model with a common slope, independent of the land use and climate type, to estimate the soil C sequestration potential. The implications of these findings are as follows: (1) a common slope regression was accurately calculated (0.83 ± 0.02 for C-silt + clay < 63 μm and 0.81 ± 0.02 for C-silt + clay < 20 μm) and (2) there was no asymptotic pattern found to support the existence of an SOC saturation pool.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33742022     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84821-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  3 in total

1.  Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews.

Authors:  S D Walter; X Yao
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility.

Authors:  Marko Ćurković; Andro Košec
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Climate change induces carbon loss of arable mineral soils in boreal conditions.

Authors:  Jaakko Heikkinen; Riikka Keskinen; Joel Kostensalo; Visa Nuutinen
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 13.211

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.