Jodi E Allen1, Gemma M Clunie2,3, Katharina Winiker4. 1. University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery. 2. National Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. 3. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. 4. Swiss University of Speech and Language Sciences SHLR, Rorschach, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Videofluoroscopy (VFSS) and fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) are established instrumental techniques to support differential diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Whilst their value is undisputed, each tool is not without limitations. The COVID-19 pandemic has restricted access to VFSS and FEES leading clinicians to explore alternative or augmentative tools to support swallowing assessment.Ultrasound (US) is an established tool for visualisation of head and neck anatomy, including structures implicated in swallowing. Although US has been utilised in swallowing research for many years, its application has not translated into common clinical practice. This review presents and debates the evidence for and against use of US for clinical swallowing assessment. RECENT FINDINGS: Evaluation of swallowing muscle morphometry and measurement of isolated swallowing kinematics are two primary uses of US in swallowing assessment that have been identified in the literature. Use of US to detect bolus flow, aspiration and residues is in its early stages and needs further research. SUMMARY: US shows promise as an adjunctive modality to support assessment of swallowing. With standardisation, these measurements may have potential for transition into clinical care. Reliability and validity testing and development of normative data are imperative to ensure its use as an evidence-based instrumentation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Videofluoroscopy (VFSS) and fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) are established instrumental techniques to support differential diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Whilst their value is undisputed, each tool is not without limitations. The COVID-19 pandemic has restricted access to VFSS and FEES leading clinicians to explore alternative or augmentative tools to support swallowing assessment.Ultrasound (US) is an established tool for visualisation of head and neck anatomy, including structures implicated in swallowing. Although US has been utilised in swallowing research for many years, its application has not translated into common clinical practice. This review presents and debates the evidence for and against use of US for clinical swallowing assessment. RECENT FINDINGS: Evaluation of swallowing muscle morphometry and measurement of isolated swallowing kinematics are two primary uses of US in swallowing assessment that have been identified in the literature. Use of US to detect bolus flow, aspiration and residues is in its early stages and needs further research. SUMMARY: US shows promise as an adjunctive modality to support assessment of swallowing. With standardisation, these measurements may have potential for transition into clinical care. Reliability and validity testing and development of normative data are imperative to ensure its use as an evidence-based instrumentation.
Authors: Lenie Van Den Engel-Hoek; Nens Van Alfen; Bert J M De Swart; Imelda J M De Groot; Sigrid Pillen Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: L van den Engel-Hoek; S Knuijt; M H J C van Gerven; M L J Lagarde; J T Groothuis; I J M de Groot; M C H Janssen Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 3.837
Authors: Rodrigo Alves de Andrade; Maria das Graças Wanderley do Sales Coriolano; Eduarda Lopes Honorato de Souza; Jamilly Henrique Costa da Silva; Maria Deluana da Cunha; Leandro Pernambuco; Vanessa Veis Ribeiro; Hilton Justino da Silva Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.438