Literature DB >> 3374182

Use of a computer to take booking histories in a hospital antenatal clinic. Acceptability to midwives and patients and effects on the midwife-patient interaction.

G Brownbridge1, R J Lilford, S Tindale-Biscoe.   

Abstract

An interactive computer system was used by midwives to acquire a full patient history at the first antenatal visit. The clinical efficacy of the system had been previously established. The present evaluation examined the effects of computer use on the interview process and on midwife-patient communications, and its acceptability to midwives and patients. Data included video recordings of 32 conventional interviews and of 63 interviews in which the computer was used, each with associated questionnaires assessing patients' reactions. Midwives' views were obtained through a structured discussion session. Computer use had no effects on patients' reactions to the interview, and midwives were enthusiastic. Detailed analysis of the video recordings using established quantitative techniques did not reveal any negative psychologic effects that would preclude the use of nurse-patient interactive computers. However, midwives were inclined to give less information to patients, especially when they were new to the computer, and to use more closed questions and leading questions. The findings have important implications for the future use of similar computer systems. These are presented in the form of guidelines for future systems design and implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3374182     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198805000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  The limited use of digital ink in the private-sector primary care physician's office.

Authors:  G J Arvary
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Computer-generated patient education materials: do they affect professional practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Shaun P Treweek; Claire Glenton; Andrew D Oxman; Alister Penrose
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Effect of using protocols on medical care: randomised trial of three methods of taking an antenatal history.

Authors:  R J Lilford; M Kelly; A Baines; S Cameron; M Cave; K Guthrie; J Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14

Review 4.  Improving communication between health professionals and women in maternity care: a structured review.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jo Garcia; Alison J Macfarlane; Leslie L Davidson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Using computers to take patient histories.

Authors:  M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-17

6.  Computers in the consulting room: a case study of clinician and patient perspectives.

Authors:  C E Aydin; J G Anderson; P N Rosen; V J Felitti; H C Weng
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1998-09

7.  Do electronic health records affect the patient-psychiatrist relationship? A before & after study of psychiatric outpatients.

Authors:  Randall F Stewart; Philip J Kroth; Mark Schuyler; Robert Bailey
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Transforming information use in preventive medicine: learning to balance technology with the art of caring.

Authors:  C E Aydin; P N Rosen; V J Felitti
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

9.  Computers in the examining room: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  C E Aydin; P N Rosen; S M Jewell; V J Felitti
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

10.  Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust.

Authors:  Richard James Lilford; Jo Foster; Mike Pringle
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.