Paula Rodriguez-Otero1, Maialen Sirvent2, Ana Pilar González-Rodríguez3, Esperanza Lavilla4, Alfonso García de Coca5, José María Arguiñano6, Josep M Martí7, Valentin Cabañas8, Cristina Motlló9, Erik de Cabo10, Cristina Encinas11, Ilda Murillo12, Jose Ángel Hernández-Rivas13, Ernesto Pérez-Persona14, Felipe Casado15, Antonia Sampol16, Ricarda García17, María Jesús Blanchard18, Magdalena Anguita19, Ana Paz Lafuente20, Belén Iñigo21, Aurelio López22, Paz Ribas23, Mario Arnao24, Roberto Maldonado25, Joan Bladé26, María Victoria Mateos27, Juan José Lahuerta28, Jesús F San Miguel29. 1. Department of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: paurodriguez@unav.es. 2. Department of Hematology, Hospital Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain. 3. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. 4. Department of Hematology, Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain. 5. Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. 6. Department of Hematology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. 7. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. 8. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain. 9. Department of Hematology, Hospital de Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Althaia, Manresa, Spain. 10. Department of Hematology, Hospital de El Bierzo, León, Spain. 11. Department of Hematology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 12. Department of Hematology, Hospital General San Jorge, Huesca, Spain. 13. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain. 14. Department of Hematology, Hospital Txagorritxu, Vitoria, Spain. 15. Department of Hematology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain. 16. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain. 17. Department of Hematology, Complejo Hospitalario de Especialidades Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain. 18. Department of Hematology, Hospital Ramón Y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. 19. Department of Hematology, Hospital de Jaén, Jaén, Spain. 20. Department of Hematology, Hospital del Tajo, Madrid, Spain. 21. Department of Hematology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. 22. Department of Hematology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain. 23. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Dr Peset Aleixandre, Valencia, Spain. 24. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain. 25. Fundación PETHEMA, Madrid, Spain. 26. Department of Hematology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. 27. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. 28. Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre, Madrid, Spain. 29. Department of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is highly challenging, especially for patients with disease refractory to initial therapy, and in particular for disease developing refractoriness to lenalidomide. Indeed, with currently approved treatments, median progression-free survival (PFS) in the lenalidomide-refractory setting is less than 10 months, reflecting the difficulty in treating this patient population. Pomalidomide is a second-generation immunomodulatory drug that has shown activity in lenalidomide-refractory disease in the setting of different combinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A real-world study was conducted by the Spanish Myeloma group in a cohort of patients with RRMM treated with pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PomCiDex). One hundred patients were treated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 39%, with a clinical benefit rate of 93%. Median PFS was 7.6 months; median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months. Median PFS and OS survival were consistent across the different subgroups analyzed. Prolonged PFS and OS were found in patients with responsive disease. CONCLUSION: Our results compared favorably with those obtained with different pomalidomide-based combinations in a similar patient population. PomCiDex remains a manageable, cost-effective, and all-oral triplet combination for RRMM patients.
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is highly challenging, especially for patients with disease refractory to initial therapy, and in particular for disease developing refractoriness to lenalidomide. Indeed, with currently approved treatments, median progression-free survival (PFS) in the lenalidomide-refractory setting is less than 10 months, reflecting the difficulty in treating this patient population. Pomalidomide is a second-generation immunomodulatory drug that has shown activity in lenalidomide-refractory disease in the setting of different combinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A real-world study was conducted by the Spanish Myeloma group in a cohort of patients with RRMM treated with pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PomCiDex). One hundred patients were treated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 39%, with a clinical benefit rate of 93%. Median PFS was 7.6 months; median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months. Median PFS and OS survival were consistent across the different subgroups analyzed. Prolonged PFS and OS were found in patients with responsive disease. CONCLUSION: Our results compared favorably with those obtained with different pomalidomide-based combinations in a similar patient population. PomCiDex remains a manageable, cost-effective, and all-oral triplet combination for RRMM patients.
Authors: Holger W Auner; Sarah R Brown; Katrina Walker; Jessica Kendall; Bryony Dawkins; David Meads; Gareth J Morgan; Martin F Kaiser; Mark Cook; Sadie Roberts; Christopher Parrish; Gordon Cook Journal: Blood Cancer J Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 11.037