BACKGROUND: Primary aim of the current randomized controlled trial was to test the effectiveness of the parenting intervention 'Video-feedback to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline' (VIPP-SD) in a sample of parents of preschool-aged twins, as well as differential susceptibility to intervention efforts, that is, whether more temperamentally reactive parents would profit more from the VIPP-SD than parents with lower reactivity. METHODS: The sample consisted of 202 families with same-sex twins [N = 404 children, mean age 45 months (SD = 6.81)]. Randomization was done at the family level in a 2:3 ratio, with 83 families (41%) randomized to the VIPP-SD group, and 119 families (59%) to the control group. After two pre-tests in year 1 and year 2 of the study, the VIPP-SD was implemented in the third year, with a post-test assessment 1 month after the five intervention sessions. Parental sensitivity was observed during structured play in which parent and child copied a drawing together in a computerized Etch-A-Sketch paradigm. Parental limit-setting was observed in a 'don't touch' task in which the parent required from the child to abstain from playing with attractive toys. Parents interacted with each of their twins in separate sessions. RESULTS: The VIPP-SD intervention had a positive impact on the level of parents' positive limit-setting in interaction with their preschool twins, and this positive effect was most pronounced when the parents completed at least five intervention sessions. However, the intervention did not enhance parental sensitivity during structured play. Parents with higher reactivity were not more open to the impact of the intervention, thus for this temperamental marker differential susceptibility in adults was not supported. CONCLUSIONS: The current study is unique in targeting families with twin preschoolers, providing proof of principle that coaching parents with video-feedback promotes parental sensitive limit-setting to both children. It remains to be seen whether this finding can be replicated in families with non-twin siblings, or other parental susceptibility markers. Trial registration Trial NL5172 (NTR5312), 2015-07-20.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Primary aim of the current randomized controlled trial was to test the effectiveness of the parenting intervention 'Video-feedback to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline' (VIPP-SD) in a sample of parents of preschool-aged twins, as well as differential susceptibility to intervention efforts, that is, whether more temperamentally reactive parents would profit more from the VIPP-SD than parents with lower reactivity. METHODS: The sample consisted of 202 families with same-sex twins [N = 404 children, mean age 45 months (SD = 6.81)]. Randomization was done at the family level in a 2:3 ratio, with 83 families (41%) randomized to the VIPP-SD group, and 119 families (59%) to the control group. After two pre-tests in year 1 and year 2 of the study, the VIPP-SD was implemented in the third year, with a post-test assessment 1 month after the five intervention sessions. Parental sensitivity was observed during structured play in which parent and child copied a drawing together in a computerized Etch-A-Sketch paradigm. Parental limit-setting was observed in a 'don't touch' task in which the parent required from the child to abstain from playing with attractive toys. Parents interacted with each of their twins in separate sessions. RESULTS: The VIPP-SD intervention had a positive impact on the level of parents' positive limit-setting in interaction with their preschool twins, and this positive effect was most pronounced when the parents completed at least five intervention sessions. However, the intervention did not enhance parental sensitivity during structured play. Parents with higher reactivity were not more open to the impact of the intervention, thus for this temperamental marker differential susceptibility in adults was not supported. CONCLUSIONS: The current study is unique in targeting families with twin preschoolers, providing proof of principle that coaching parents with video-feedback promotes parental sensitive limit-setting to both children. It remains to be seen whether this finding can be replicated in families with non-twin siblings, or other parental susceptibility markers. Trial registration Trial NL5172 (NTR5312), 2015-07-20.
Authors: Jantien Van Zeijl; Judi Mesman; Marinus H Van IJzendoorn; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Femmie Juffer; Mirjam N Stolk; Hans M Koot; Lenneke R A Alink Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2006-12
Authors: Tinca J C Polderman; Beben Benyamin; Christiaan A de Leeuw; Patrick F Sullivan; Arjen van Bochoven; Peter M Visscher; Danielle Posthuma Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Claudia I Vrijhof; Saskia Euser; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Bianca G van den Bulk; Jizzo R Bosdriesz; Mariëlle Linting; Ilse C van Wijk; Ilse de Visser; Marinus H van IJzendoorn Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2019-12-12
Authors: Saskia Euser; Jizzo R Bosdriesz; Claudia I Vrijhof; Bianca G van den Bulk; Debby van Hees; Sanne M de Vet; Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg Journal: Child Dev Date: 2020-04-09
Authors: Dafna A Windhorst; Viara R Mileva-Seitz; Ralph C A Rippe; Henning Tiemeier; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Frank C Verhulst; Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Eveline A Crone; Michelle Achterberg; Simone Dobbelaar; Saskia Euser; Bianca van den Bulk; Mara van der Meulen; Lina van Drunen; Lara M Wierenga; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Marinus H van IJzendoorn Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Date: 2020-07-11 Impact factor: 6.464
Authors: Guy Bosmans; Leen Van Vlierberghe; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Roger Kobak; Dirk Hermans; Marinus H van IJzendoorn Journal: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Date: 2022-01-30