Literature DB >> 33741043

Analysis of structure indicators influencing 3-h and 6-h compliance with the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines in China: a systematic review.

Lu Wang1,2, Xudong Ma3, Huaiwu He1,2, Longxiang Su1,2, Yanhong Guo3, Guangliang Shan4, Xiang Zhou5,6, Dawei Liu7,8, Yun Long1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compliance with the surviving sepsis campaign (SSC) guidelines (Cssc) is a key factor affecting the effects of sepsis treatment. We designed this study to investigate the relationships of the structure indicators of ICU on 3 and 6-h Cssc in China.
METHODS: A total of 1854 hospitals were enrolled in a survey, led by the China National Critical Care Quality Control Center (China-NCCQC) from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. We investigated the 1854 hospitals' 3 and 6-h Cssc, including compliance with each specific measure of the 3-h and 6-h SSC bundles. We also investigated the actual level of the structure indicators of ICU, released by China-NCCQC in 2015.The outcomes were in adherence with the SSC guidelines (2016). Monitoring indicators included 3 and 6-h Cssc.
RESULTS: In the subgroup, the rate of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was the highest, and the rate of CVP and ScvO2 measurement was the lowest among the items of 3 and 6-h Cssc. Structure indicators related to 3 and 6-h Cssc include the predicted mortality rate and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The relationships between 3 and 6-h Cssc and the proportion of ICU in total inpatient bed occupancy, the proportion of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥ 15 in all ICU patients were uncertain. There was no relationship of 3 and 6-h Cssc with the proportion of ICU patients among total inpatients.
CONCLUSIONS: Structure indicators influencing 3 and 6-h Cssc in China are the predicted mortality rate and the standardized mortality rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Compliance; ICU; Structure indicator; Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines

Year:  2021        PMID: 33741043      PMCID: PMC7976719          DOI: 10.1186/s40001-021-00498-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Res        ISSN: 0949-2321            Impact factor:   2.175


  17 in total

Review 1.  Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis*.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Stevenson; Amanda R Rubenstein; Gregory T Radin; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Allan J Walkey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; R Phillip Dellinger; Sean R Townsend; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; John C Marshall; Julian Bion; Christa Schorr; Antonio Artigas; Graham Ramsay; Richard Beale; Margaret M Parker; Herwig Gerlach; Konrad Reinhart; Eliezer Silva; Maurene Harvey; Susan Regan; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.

Authors:  Vikramjit Mukherjee; Laura Evans
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  Variations in organism-specific severe sepsis mortality in the United States: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Chizobam Ani; Siavash Farshidpanah; Amy Bellinghausen Stewart; H Bryant Nguyen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Yingxia Xiong; Christa Schorr; R P Dellinger
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Association of septic shock definitions and standardized mortality ratio in a contemporary cohort of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Rahul Kashyap; Tarun D Singh; Hamza Rayes; John C O'Horo; Gregory Wilson; Philippe Bauer; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Epidemiology and Changes in Mortality of Sepsis After the Implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines.

Authors:  Rubén Herrán-Monge; Arturo Muriel-Bombín; Marta M García-García; Pedro A Merino-García; Miguel Martínez-Barrios; David Andaluz; Juan Carlos Ballesteros; Ana María Domínguez-Berrot; Susana Moradillo-Gonzalez; Santiago Macías; Braulio Álvarez-Martínez; M José Fernández-Calavia; Concepción Tarancón; Jesús Villar; Jesús Blanco
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.510

9.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study).

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Gary Phillips; Richard Beale; Maurizio Cecconi; Jean Daniel Chiche; Daniel De Backer; Jigeeshu Divatia; Bin Du; Laura Evans; Ricard Ferrer; Massimo Girardis; Despoina Koulenti; Flavia Machado; Steven Q Simpson; Cheng Cheng Tan; Xavier Wittebole; Mitchell Levy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Hospital quality measures: are process indicators associated with hospital standardized mortality ratios in French acute care hospitals?

Authors:  Marcus Ngantcha; Marie-Annick Le-Pogam; Sophie Calmus; Catherine Grenier; Isabelle Evrard; Agathe Lamarche-Vadel; Grégoire Rey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.