Literature DB >> 33740990

Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study.

Yan Tang1, Qian-Dong He1, Ting-Ting Zhang1, Jing-Jing Wang1, Si-Chong Huang1, Yun Ye2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some studies have stated that intrauterine insemination (IUI) with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might increase the pregnancy rate, while others suggest that IUI in the natural cycle (NC) should be the first line of treatment. It remains unclear whether it is necessary to use COS at the same time when IUI is applied to treat isolated male factor infertility. Thus, we aimed to investigate efficacy of IUI with COS for isolated male factor infertility.
METHODS: A total of 601 IUI cycles from 307 couples who sought medical care for isolated male factor infertility between January 2010 and February 2020 were divided into two groups: NC-IUI and COS-IUI. The COS-IUI group was further divided into two subgroups according to the number of pre-ovulatory follicles on the day of HCG: cycles with monofollicular development (one follicle group) and cycles with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles (≥ 2 follicles group). The IUI outcomes, including clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, and multiple pregnancy rates were compared.
RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, and ectopic pregnancy rates were comparable between the NC-IUI and COS-IUI group. Similar results were also observed among the NC-IUI, one follicle, and ≥ 2 follicles groups. However, with respect to the multiple pregnancy rate, a trend toward higher multiple pregnancy rate was observed in the COS-IUI group compared to the NC-IUI group (8.7% vs. 0, P = 0.091), and a significant difference was found between the NC-IUI and ≥ 2 follicles group (0 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.033).
CONCLUSION: In COS cycles, especially in those with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles, the multiple pregnancy rate increased without a substantial gain in overall pregnancy rate; thus, COS should not be preferred in IUI for isolated male factor infertility. If COS is required, one stimulated follicle and one healthy baby should be the goal considering the safety of both mothers and foetuses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical pregnancy; Controlled ovarian stimulation; Intrauterine insemination; Live birth; Multiple pregnancy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33740990     DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol        ISSN: 1477-7827            Impact factor:   5.211


  18 in total

Review 1.  Best practice policies for male infertility.

Authors:  Ira D Sharlip; Jonathan P Jarow; Arnold M Belker; Larry I Lipshultz; Mark Sigman; Anthony J Thomas; Peter N Schlegel; Stuart S Howards; Ajay Nehra; Marian D Damewood; James W Overstreet; Richard Sadovsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Male factor infertility and ART.

Authors:  Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network.

Authors:  D S Guzick; S A Carson; C Coutifaris; J W Overstreet; P Factor-Litvak; M P Steinkampf; J A Hill; L Mastroianni; J E Buster; S T Nakajima; D L Vogel; R E Canfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study.

Authors:  B J Cohlen; E R te Velde; R J van Kooij; C W Looman; J D Habbema
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Intrauterine insemination as first line treatment of unexplained and male factor infertility.

Authors:  C Keck; C Gerber-Schäfer; M Breckwoldt
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 6.  Does intra-uterine insemination have a place in modern ART practice?

Authors:  Valarmathy Kandavel; Ying Cheong
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 7.  Indications of intrauterine insemination for male and non-male factor infertility.

Authors:  Yong Jin Kim; Chan Woo Park; Seung-Yup Ku
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 1.303

8.  Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A J Goverde; J McDonnell; J P Vermeiden; R Schats; F F Rutten; J Schoemaker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Ovarian stimulation in infertile women treated with the use of intrauterine insemination: a cohort study from China.

Authors:  Shuo Huang; Rui Wang; Rong Li; Haiyan Wang; Jie Qiao; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Hormonal, follicular and endometrial dynamics in letrozole-treated versus natural cycles in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamed A Bedaiwy; Mahmoud A Abdelaleem; Mostafa Hussein; Noha Mousa; Lisa N Brunengraber; Robert F Casper
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors Affecting Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Yue Zhang; Hong-Liang Sun; Li-Ting Wang; Xue-Feng Li; Fei Wang; Yan-Lin Wang; Qing-Chun Li
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.