Literature DB >> 33740933

Application of open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation in cervical intraspinal tumors.

Zhi-Chao Wang1, Shu-Zhong Li1, Xin-Fei Qu2, Chu-Qiang Yin1, Yuan-Liang Sun1, Yue-Lei Wang1, Jie Wang1, Chen-Jing Liu1, Zhen-Lu Cao1, Ting Wang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The open-door laminoplasty is an effective procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, little information is available about the surgical results of open-door laminoplasty in the treatment of intraspinal tumors. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the clinical effect of open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation in the treatment of cervical intraspinal tumors.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study. From January 2013 to May 2018, 38 patients (13 males and 25 females, the average age of 44 ± 17 years) with cervical intraspinal tumors underwent open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation in our hospital. The operation time, blood loss, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were determined. To determine the radiographic outcomes, cervical X-ray film and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed before and after the operation, and cervical X-ray sagittal film was used to measure Cobb angle. The clinical data before and after the operation were compared by t-test.
RESULTS: A total of 38 patients underwent a successful operation and demonstrated primary healing. The average operation time was 113 ± 12 min. The average blood loss was 120 ± 19 mL. All patients were followed up for 26.1 ± 2.8 months, and the final follow-up time was more than 24 months. VAS scores were much better at 24 months after operation compared with those before the operation, which were decreased from 6.1 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 0.7 (t = 32.63, P < 0.01). The JOA score was improved from 9.9 ± 1.5 to 15.5 ± 0.6 (t = - 18.36, P < 0.01), and the mean JOA recovery rate was 79% ± 11% at 24 months after the operation. There was no significant difference in Cobb angle between pre-operation and 24 months after the operation, which was 9.8 ± 2.6 and 10.3 ± 3.1 respectively (t = - 0.61, P > 0.05). Neither spinal malalignment on the coronal plane nor displacement of the laminoplasty flap was observed on postoperative cervical X-ray and MRI examinations at the final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation was a safe and effective surgical approach for the treatment of cervical intraspinal tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARCH plate; Cervical; Intradural tumor; Open-door laminoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33740933      PMCID: PMC7980540          DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01140-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Surg        ISSN: 1471-2482            Impact factor:   2.102


  31 in total

1.  Long-term stability after multilevel cervical laminectomy for spinal cord tumor resection in von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  Ashok R Asthagiri; Gautam U Mehta; John A Butman; Martin Baggenstos; Edward H Oldfield; Russell R Lonser
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-01-28

2.  Concurrent spinal schwannomas and meningiomas. Case illustration.

Authors:  Satoshi Ogihara; Atsushi Seichi; Motoshige Iwasaki; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Yasuhito Tajiri; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Unilateral Hemilaminectomy for Intradural Lesions.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Monish M Maharaj; Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Retrospective observational comparative study of Hemilaminectomy versus Laminectomy for intraspinal tumour resection; Shorter Stays, Lower Analgesic Usage and Less Kyphotic Deformity.

Authors:  Christopher Paul Millward; Dolin Bhagawati; Huan Wee Chan; Jonathan Bestwick; John Edward Brecknell
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Biomechanical Role of the Thoracolumbar Ligaments of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Cong-Cong Wu; Hai-Ming Jin; Ying-Zhao Yan; Jian Chen; Ke Wang; Jian-Le Wang; Zeng-Jie Zhang; Ai-Min Wu; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Recapping T-saw laminoplasty for spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  N Kawahara; K Tomita; Y Shinya; T Matsumoto; H Baba; T Fujita; H Murakami; T Kobayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgical Complications in Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors - An ACS-NSQIP Analysis of Spinal Cord Level and Malignancy.

Authors:  Abhiraj D Bhimani; Steven Denyer; Darian R Esfahani; Jack Zakrzewski; Tania M Aguilar; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 8.  Spinal cord tumours: advances in genetics and their implications for treatment.

Authors:  Patricia L Zadnik; Ziya L Gokaslan; Peter C Burger; Chetan Bettegowda
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.

Authors:  F Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Early versus late spinal decompression surgery in treatment of traumatic spinal cord injuries; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Yousefifard; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Masoud Baikpour; Parisa Ghelichkhani; Mostafa Hosseini; AliMoghadas Jafari; Heidar Aziznejad; Abbas Tafakhori
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.