Literature DB >> 33739785

Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Discordant p16 and HPV mRNA Results: Incidence and Characterization in a Large, Contemporary United States Cohort.

Justin R Shinn1, Seth J Davis2, Krystle A Lang-Kuhs2,3, Sarah Rohde2, Xiaowei Wang4, Ping Liu5, William D Dupont6, Dale Plummer6, Wade L Thorstad7, Rebecca D Chernock5, Mitra Mehrad2,8, James S Lewis2,8.   

Abstract

Early studies estimate that 5% to 10% of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas overexpress p16 but are unassociated with transcriptionally-active high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). Patients with discordant HPV testing may experience clinical outcomes that differ from traditional expectations. To document the rate of p16 and HPV mRNA positivity, characterize patients with discordant testing, and identify features that may warrant selective use of HPV-specific testing after p16 IHC, a multi-institutional, retrospective review of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients with p16 IHC and HPV mRNA testing by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was performed. Of the 467 patients, most had T1 or T2 tumors (71%), 82% were p16 positive, and 84% were HPV mRNA positive. Overall, most tumors were nonkeratinizing (378, 81%), which was strongly associated with p16 and HPV positivity (93% and 95%, respectively). Overall, 81% of patients were double positive, 14% double negative, and 4.9% discordant (3.4% p16 negative/HPV mRNA positive and 1.5% p16 positive/HPV mRNA negative). The survival rates of these discordant patient groups fell squarely between the 2 concordant groups, although in multivariate analysis for both disease-free survival and overall survival, discordant patients were not found to have statistically significantly different outcomes. Reclassifying patients by applying HPV mRNA testing when p16 results and morphology do not match, or when p16 results are equivocal, improved prognostication slightly over p16 or HPV mRNA testing alone. Patients with discordant testing demonstrate a borderline significant trend toward survival differences from those with concordant tests. When evaluated independently, patients who were p16 negative but HPV mRNA positive had a prognosis somewhat closer to double-positive patients, while those who were p16 positive, but HPV mRNA negative had a prognosis closer to that of double-negative patients. We suggest an algorithm whereby confirmatory HPV mRNA testing is performed in patients where p16 status is not consistent with tumor morphology. This captures a majority of discordant patients and improves, albeit modestly, the prognostication.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33739785      PMCID: PMC8192336          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.298


  35 in total

1.  A novel RT-PCR method for quantification of human papillomavirus transcripts in archived tissues and its application in oropharyngeal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Ge Gao; Rebecca D Chernock; Hiram A Gay; Wade L Thorstad; Tian R Zhang; Hongwei Wang; Xiao-Jun Ma; Yuling Luo; James S Lewis; Xiaowei Wang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  In situ hybridization for high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA is a superior method for detecting transcriptionally active HPV in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Reija Randén-Brady; Timo Carpén; Lauri Jouhi; Stina Syrjänen; Caj Haglund; Jussi Tarkkanen; Satu Remes; Antti Mäkitie; Petri S Mattila; Suvi Silén; Jaana Hagström
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Age Profile of Patients With Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Eleni M Rettig; Carole Fakhry; Armen Khararjian; William H Westra
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Extracapsular extension of neck nodes and absence of human papillomavirus 16-DNA are predictors of impaired survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Josefine Freitag; Theresa Wald; Thomas Kuhnt; Tanja Gradistanac; Marlen Kolb; Andreas Dietz; Susanne Wiegand; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Association of keratinization with 5-year disease-specific survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Timothy Cooper; Vincent L Biron; Ben Adam; Alexander C Klimowicz; Lakshmi Puttagunta; Hadi Seikaly
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Prognostic significance of p16INK4A and human papillomavirus in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated on TROG 02.02 phase III trial.

Authors:  Danny Rischin; Richard J Young; Richard Fisher; Stephen B Fox; Quynh-Thu Le; Lester J Peters; Ben Solomon; Jimin Choi; Brian O'Sullivan; Lizbeth M Kenny; Grant A McArthur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  HPV-related nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: utility of microscopic features in predicting patient outcome.

Authors:  Rebecca D Chernock; Samir K El-Mofty; Wade L Thorstad; Curtis A Parvin; James S Lewis
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2009-07-11

8.  Increasing prevalence rates of HPV attributable oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in the Netherlands as assessed by a validated test algorithm.

Authors:  Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Elisabeth Bloemena; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Albertus T Hesselink; Birgit I Witte; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Chris J L M Meijer; Peter J F Snijders; Ruud H Brakenhoff
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Keratinizing-type squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: p16 overexpression is associated with positive high-risk HPV status and improved survival.

Authors:  Chunyu Cai; Rebecca D Chernock; Meredith E Pittman; Samir K El-Mofty; Wade L Thorstad; James S Lewis
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  A comparison of clinically utilized human papillomavirus detection methods in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas F Schlecht; Margaret Brandwein-Gensler; Gerard J Nuovo; Maomi Li; Anne Dunne; Nicole Kawachi; Richard V Smith; Robert D Burk; Michael B Prystowsky
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Case of HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Block-Like, Partial Loss of p16 Expression.

Authors:  S A Rasmussen; J S Lewis; L Mirabello; S Bass; M Yeager; M J Corsten; M J Bullock
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  A clinical analysis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-institution's experience.

Authors:  Rina Jiromaru; Ryuji Yasumatsu; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Ryosuke Kuga; Takahiro Hongo; Takafumi Nakano; Tomomi Manako; Kazuki Hashimoto; Takahiro Wakasaki; Mioko Matsuo; Takashi Nakagawa
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Evolution of a Paradigm Switch in Diagnosis and Treatment of HPV-Driven Head and Neck Cancer-Striking the Balance Between Toxicity and Cure.

Authors:  Bouchra Tawk; Jürgen Debus; Amir Abdollahi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 4.  An Update on the Immunotherapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yaxuan Huang; Yunyun Lan; Zhe Zhang; Xue Xiao; Tingting Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Concordance of p16INK4a and E6*I mRNA among HPV-DNA-Positive Oropharyngeal, Laryngeal, and Oral Cavity Carcinomas from the ICO International Study.

Authors:  Marisa Mena; Xin Wang; Sara Tous; Beatriz Quiros; Omar Clavero; Maria Alejo; Francisca Morey; Miren Taberna; Xavier Leon Vintro; Belén Lloveras Rubio; Llúcia Alos; Hisham Mehanna; Wim Quint; Michael Pawlita; Massimo Tommasino; Miguel Angel Pavón; Nubia Muñoz; Silvia De Sanjose; Francesc Xavier Bosch; Laia Alemany
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.