| Literature DB >> 33739622 |
Ronaldo Sousa1, Dariusz Halabowski2, Anna M Labecka3, Karel Douda4, Olga Aksenova5, Yulia Bespalaya5, Ivan Bolotov5, Juergen Geist6, Hugh A Jones7, Ekaterina Konopleva5, Michael W Klunzinger8,9, Carlos A Lasso10, Iga Lewin2, Xiongjun Liu11, Manuel Lopes-Lima12, Jon Mageroy13, Musa Mlambo14,15, Keiko Nakamura16,17, Mitsunori Nakano18, Martin Österling19, John Pfeiffer20, Vincent Prié21, Lucas R P Paschoal22, Nicoletta Riccardi23, Rogério Santos24, Spase Shumka25, Allan K Smith26, Mikhail O Son27, Amílcar Teixeira28, Frankie Thielen29, Santiago Torres30, Simone Varandas31, Ilya V Vikhrev5, Xiaoping Wu11, Alexandra Zieritz32, Joana G Nogueira12.
Abstract
Anthropogenic freshwater habitats may provide undervalued prospects for long-term conservation as part of species conservation planning. This fundamental, but overlooked, issue requires attention considering the pace that humans have been altering natural freshwater ecosystems and the accelerated levels of biodiversity decline in recent decades. We compiled 709 records of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia, Unionida) inhabiting a broad variety of anthropogenic habitat types (from small ponds to large reservoirs and canals) and reviewed their importance as refuges for this faunal group. Most records came from Europe and North America, with a clear dominance of canals and reservoirs. The dataset covered 228 species, including 34 threatened species on the IUCN Red List. We discuss the conservation importance and provide guidance on how these anthropogenic habitats could be managed to provide optimal conservation value to freshwater mussels. This review also shows that some of these habitats may function as ecological traps owing to conflicting management practices or because they act as a sink for some populations. Therefore, anthropogenic habitats should not be seen as a panacea to resolve conservation problems. More information is necessary to better understand the trade-offs between human use and the conservation of freshwater mussels (and other biota) within anthropogenic habitats, given the low number of quantitative studies and the strong biogeographic knowledge bias that persists.Entities:
Keywords: ecological traps; freshwater biodiversity; novel ecosystems; sink habitats; unionids
Year: 2021 PMID: 33739622 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Chang Biol ISSN: 1354-1013 Impact factor: 10.863