Zarnie Khadjesari1, Tracey Brown2, Felix Naughton1. 1. Behavioural and Implementation Science research group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia. 2. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: mHealth applications (apps) for addictive behaviours offer widespread provision of digital support, with particular benefits for stigmatised groups and those with poor access to treatment services. Regulation and accreditation may encourage the uptake and use of evidence-based addictive behaviour apps, yet this is a complex and confusing landscape. We navigate international regulatory and accreditation guidance, explore some of the implementation challenges and provide implications for app developers, healthcare professionals, app users. ANALYSIS: We explore the classification of health and wellbeing, blended support and clinical therapy apps as medical devices by country, to help readers navigate the complexity of the guidance. We describe an addictive behaviour app classified as a medical device and explore the innovative approaches to regulation that are currently emerging. We discuss the use of curated online app libraries that adhere to thresholds for characteristics such as quality, user satisfaction or effectiveness, which we hope will become the starting point in the search for suitable apps, rather than commercial app stores. We also explore the ethical concerns associated with apps and how curated libraries address these. CONCLUSIONS: International regulation of apps as medical devices varies across countries and would benefit from standardisation in a simple, usable and transparent format. Efforts to provide accreditation of non-medical device apps are also variable and public bodies provide mixed messages around endorsement. Healthcare professionals and users are encouraged to use accredited apps for addictive behaviours, where they exist, or explore other forms of digital intervention with a stronger evidence-base. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: mHealth applications (apps) for addictive behaviours offer widespread provision of digital support, with particular benefits for stigmatised groups and those with poor access to treatment services. Regulation and accreditation may encourage the uptake and use of evidence-based addictive behaviour apps, yet this is a complex and confusing landscape. We navigate international regulatory and accreditation guidance, explore some of the implementation challenges and provide implications for app developers, healthcare professionals, app users. ANALYSIS: We explore the classification of health and wellbeing, blended support and clinical therapy apps as medical devices by country, to help readers navigate the complexity of the guidance. We describe an addictive behaviour app classified as a medical device and explore the innovative approaches to regulation that are currently emerging. We discuss the use of curated online app libraries that adhere to thresholds for characteristics such as quality, user satisfaction or effectiveness, which we hope will become the starting point in the search for suitable apps, rather than commercial app stores. We also explore the ethical concerns associated with apps and how curated libraries address these. CONCLUSIONS: International regulation of apps as medical devices varies across countries and would benefit from standardisation in a simple, usable and transparent format. Efforts to provide accreditation of non-medical device apps are also variable and public bodies provide mixed messages around endorsement. Healthcare professionals and users are encouraged to use accredited apps for addictive behaviours, where they exist, or explore other forms of digital intervention with a stronger evidence-base. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
addiction; app accreditation; app regulation; mHealth; medical device
Authors: Fulton F Velez; Sam Colman; Laura Kauffman; Charles Ruetsch; Kathryn Anastassopoulos; Yuri A Maricich Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2021-10-29
Authors: Zarnie Khadjesari; Tracey J Brown; Alex T Ramsey; Henry Goodfellow; Sherine El-Toukhy; Lorien C Abroms; Helena Jopling; Arden Dierker Viik; Michael S Amato Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-07-11