Literature DB >> 33739425

Discrepancies Between Clinician and Participant Intervention Adherence Ratings Predict Percent Weight Change During a Six-Month Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention.

Michael P Berry1, Elisabeth M Seburg2, Meghan L Butryn1, Robert W Jeffery3, Melissa M Crane4, Rona L Levy5, Evan M Forman1, Nancy E Sherwood3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals receiving behavioral weight loss treatment frequently fail to adhere to prescribed dietary and self-monitoring instructions, resulting in weight loss clinicians often needing to assess and intervene in these important weight control behaviors. A significant obstacle to improving adherence is that clinicians and clients sometimes disagree on the degree to which clients are actually adherent. However, prior research has not examined how clinicians and clients differ in their perceptions of client adherence to weight control behaviors, nor the implications for treatment outcomes.
PURPOSE: In the context of a 6-month weight-loss treatment, we examined differences between participants and clinicians when rating adherence to weight control behaviors (dietary self-monitoring; limiting calorie intake) and evaluated the hypothesis that rating one's own adherence more highly than one's clinician would predict less weight loss during treatment.
METHODS: Using clinician and participant-reported measures of self-monitoring and calorie intake adherence, each assessed using a single item with a 7- or 8-point scale, we characterized discrepancies between participant and clinician adherence and examined associations with percent weight change over 6 months using linear mixed-effects models.
RESULTS: Results indicated that ratings of adherence were higher when reported by participants and supported the hypothesis that participants who provided higher adherence ratings relative to their clinicians lost less weight during treatment (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that participants in weight loss treatment frequently appraise their own adherence more highly than their clinicians and that participants who do so to a greater degree tend to lose less weight. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Calorie intake; Discrepancies; Self-monitoring; Weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33739425      PMCID: PMC8075610          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  37 in total

Review 1.  The use of motivational interviewing in weight loss.

Authors:  Brent Van Dorsten
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Physical activity self-monitoring and weight loss: 6-month results of the SMART trial.

Authors:  Molly B Conroy; Kyeongra Yang; Okan U Elci; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Mindi A Styn; Jing Wang; Andrea M Kriska; Susan M Sereika; Lora E Burke
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Behavioral treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Meghan L Butryn; Victoria Webb; Thomas A Wadden
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12

4.  Qualitative perceptions and caloric estimations of healthy and unhealthy foods by behavioral weight loss participants.

Authors:  Robert A Carels; Jessica Harper; Krista Konrad
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  What variables are associated with successful weight loss outcomes for bariatric surgery after 1 year?

Authors:  Athena H Robinson; Sarah Adler; Helen B Stevens; Alison M Darcy; John M Morton; Debra L Safer
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 6.  Measuring food intake with digital photography.

Authors:  C K Martin; T Nicklas; B Gunturk; J B Correa; H R Allen; C Champagne
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.089

7.  Dietary adherence and weight loss success among overweight women: results from the A TO Z weight loss study.

Authors:  S Alhassan; S Kim; A Bersamin; A C King; C D Gardner
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  The BestFIT trial: A SMART approach to developing individualized weight loss treatments.

Authors:  Nancy E Sherwood; Meghan L Butryn; Evan M Forman; Daniel Almirall; Elisabeth M Seburg; A Lauren Crain; Alicia S Kunin-Batson; Marcia G Hayes; Rona L Levy; Robert W Jeffery
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Questionnaire to assess adherence to diet and exercise advices for weight management in lifestyle-related diseases.

Authors:  Sravan Kumar Dubasi; Piyush Ranjan; Charu Arora; Naval K Vikram; Sada N Dwivedi; Namrata Singh; Gauri S Kaloiya
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-02

10.  The peril of self-reported adherence in digital interventions: A brief example.

Authors:  Jayde A M Flett; Benjamin D Fletcher; Benjamin C Riordan; Tess Patterson; Harlene Hayne; Tamlin S Conner
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2019-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.