Osamu Shiraishi1, Tomoki Makino2, Makoto Yamasaki3, Koji Tanaka3, Kotaro Yamashita3, Tomo Ishida3, Keijiro Sugimura4, Hiroshi Miyata4, Masaaki Motoori5, Kazumasa Fujitani5, Atsushi Takeno6, Motohiro Hirao7, Yutaka Kimura1, Taroh Satoh8, Masahiko Yano4, Yuichiro Doki3, Takushi Yasuda1. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan. 2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2-E2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. tmakino@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2-E2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. 4. Department of Digestive Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Osaka, Japan. 5. Department of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Osaka, Japan. 6. Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan. 7. Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Chuo Ward, Osaka, Japan. 8. Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes between two- vs. three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to clarify the optimal treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) in a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial. BACKGROUND: An optimal number of NAC cycles remains to be established for locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to either two (N = 91) or three (N = 89) courses of DCF (70 mg/m2 intravenous docetaxel and 70 mg/m2 intravenous cisplatin on day 1, and a continuous 700 mg/m2 fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks followed by surgery. We compared the two groups for perioperative parameters, adverse events, and the response to NAC. RESULTS: The two- and three-course groups showed similar completion rates and overall NAC dose reductions. Although the two-course group showed significantly lower overall grades 3-4 leukopenia and anemia compared to the three-course group, the two groups had similar overall toxicity rates. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups, except arrhythmia (13 vs. 0%, P = 0.0007). Only two postoperative in-hospital deaths occurred in the three-course group, due to sepsis following severe pneumonia. Compared to the two-course group, the three-course group was associated with a significantly better clinical response (42.9 vs. 65.2%, P = 0.0027) and a relatively higher rate of pathological complete response (9.1 vs. 15.3%, P = 0.212). CONCLUSION: Both two- and three-course DCF regimens in the NAC setting seemed to be equally feasible in locally advanced ESCC patients. Additional DCF courses led to a better NAC response without increasing the incidence of adverse events or postoperative morbidity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (Identification Number UMIN 000015788).
OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes between two- vs. three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to clarify the optimal treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) in a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial. BACKGROUND: An optimal number of NAC cycles remains to be established for locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to either two (N = 91) or three (N = 89) courses of DCF (70 mg/m2 intravenous docetaxel and 70 mg/m2 intravenous cisplatin on day 1, and a continuous 700 mg/m2 fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks followed by surgery. We compared the two groups for perioperative parameters, adverse events, and the response to NAC. RESULTS: The two- and three-course groups showed similar completion rates and overall NAC dose reductions. Although the two-course group showed significantly lower overall grades 3-4 leukopenia and anemia compared to the three-course group, the two groups had similar overall toxicity rates. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups, except arrhythmia (13 vs. 0%, P = 0.0007). Only two postoperative in-hospital deaths occurred in the three-course group, due to sepsis following severe pneumonia. Compared to the two-course group, the three-course group was associated with a significantly better clinical response (42.9 vs. 65.2%, P = 0.0027) and a relatively higher rate of pathological complete response (9.1 vs. 15.3%, P = 0.212). CONCLUSION: Both two- and three-course DCF regimens in the NAC setting seemed to be equally feasible in locally advanced ESCC patients. Additional DCF courses led to a better NAC response without increasing the incidence of adverse events or postoperative morbidity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (Identification Number UMIN 000015788).