Literature DB >> 33738642

National Preclinical Sepsis Platform: developing a framework for accelerating innovation in Canadian sepsis research.

Asher A Mendelson1,2, Casey Lansdell3, Alison E Fox-Robichaud4,5, Patricia Liaw4,5, Jaskirat Arora5,6, Jean-François Cailhier7,8, Gediminas Cepinskas1,2, Emmanuel Charbonney7,8, Claudia Dos Santos9,10,11, Dhruva Dwivedi4,5, Christopher G Ellis1,12, Dean Fergusson13, Kirsten Fiest14, Sean E Gill2,15,16, Kathryn Hendrick17, Victoria T Hunniford13, Paulina M Kowalewska12, Karla Krewulak14, Christian Lehmann18, Kimberly Macala19, John C Marshall9,10,20,21, Laura Mawdsley1, Braedon McDonald14,22, Ellen McDonald4,5, Sarah K Medeiros5,6, Valdirene S Muniz4,5, Marcin Osuchowski23, Justin Presseau13,24, Neha Sharma5,6, Sahar Sohrabipour5,6, Janet Sunohara-Neilson25, Gloria Vázquez-Grande26,27, Ruud A W Veldhuizen2,15,16, Donald Welsh12,15,16, Brent W Winston22,28,29, Ryan Zarychanski26,30, Haibo Zhang9,31,32, Juan Zhou18, Manoj M Lalu33,34.   

Abstract

Despite decades of preclinical research, no experimentally derived therapies for sepsis have been successfully adopted into routine clinical practice. Factors that contribute to this crisis of translation include poor representation by preclinical models of the complex human condition of sepsis, bias in preclinical studies, as well as limitations of single-laboratory methodology. To overcome some of these shortcomings, multicentre preclinical studies-defined as a research experiment conducted in two or more research laboratories with a common protocol and analysis-are expected to maximize transparency, improve reproducibility, and enhance generalizability. The ultimate objective is to increase the efficiency and efficacy of bench-to-bedside translation for preclinical sepsis research and improve outcomes for patients with life-threatening infection. To this end, we organized the first meeting of the National Preclinical Sepsis Platform (NPSP). This multicentre preclinical  research collaboration of Canadian sepsis researchers and stakeholders was established to study the pathophysiology of sepsis and accelerate movement of promising therapeutics into early phase clinical trials. Integrated knowledge translation and shared decision-making were emphasized to ensure the goals of the platform align with clinical researchers and patient partners. 29 participants from 10 independent labs attended and discussed four main topics: (1) objectives of the platform; (2) animal models of sepsis; (3) multicentre methodology and (4) outcomes for evaluation. A PIRO model (predisposition, insult, response, organ dysfunction) for experimental design was proposed to strengthen linkages with interdisciplinary researchers and key stakeholders. This platform represents an important resource for maximizing translational impact of preclinical sepsis research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental models of sepsis; Integrated knowledge translation; Multi-stakeholder; Multicentre preclinical; PIRO; Reproducibility; Sepsis; Translation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33738642      PMCID: PMC7973346          DOI: 10.1186/s40635-020-00366-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp        ISSN: 2197-425X


  36 in total

1.  A microfluidic device for rapid quantification of cell-free DNA in patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Jun Yang; P Ravi Selvaganapathy; Travis J Gould; Dhruva J Dwivedi; Dingsheng Liu; Alison E Fox-Robichaud; Patricia C Liaw
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority - A WHO Resolution.

Authors:  Konrad Reinhart; Ron Daniels; Niranjan Kissoon; Flavia R Machado; Raymond D Schachter; Simon Finfer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed?

Authors:  John C Marshall
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 4.  The next step in translational research: lessons learned from the first preclinical randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gemma Llovera; Arthur Liesz
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 5.  The pathogenesis of sepsis.

Authors:  Deborah J Stearns-Kurosawa; Marcin F Osuchowski; Catherine Valentine; Shinichiro Kurosawa; Daniel G Remick
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 6.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Domecq; Gabriela Prutsky; Tarig Elraiyah; Zhen Wang; Mohammed Nabhan; Nathan Shippee; Juan Pablo Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia Erwin; David Eton; Jeff Sloan; Victor Montori; Noor Asi; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Fergusson; Zarah Monfaredi; Kusala Pussegoda; Chantelle Garritty; Anne Lyddiatt; Beverley Shea; Lisa Duffett; Mona Ghannad; Joshua Montroy; M. Hassan Murad; Misty Pratt; Tamara Rader; Risa Shorr; Fatemeh Yazdi
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 8.  Rethinking animal models of sepsis - working towards improved clinical translation whilst integrating the 3Rs.

Authors:  Manasi Nandi; Simon K Jackson; Duncan Macrae; Manu Shankar-Hari; Jordi L Tremoleda; Elliot Lilley
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 6.124

Review 9.  The PIRO (predisposition, insult, response, organ dysfunction) model: toward a staging system for acute illness.

Authors:  John C Marshall
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.882

10.  Minimum Quality Threshold in Pre-Clinical Sepsis Studies (MQTiPSS): An International Expert Consensus Initiative for Improvement of Animal Modeling in Sepsis.

Authors:  Marcin F Osuchowski; Alfred Ayala; Soheyl Bahrami; Michael Bauer; Mihaly Boros; Jean-Marc Cavaillon; Irshad H Chaudry; Craig M Coopersmith; Clifford S Deutschman; Susanne Drechsler; Philip Efron; Claes Frostell; Gerhard Fritsch; Waldemar Gozdzik; Judith Hellman; Markus Huber-Lang; Shigeaki Inoue; Sylvia Knapp; Andrey V Kozlov; Claude Libert; John C Marshall; Lyle L Moldawer; Peter Radermacher; Heinz Redl; Daniel G Remick; Mervyn Singer; Christoph Thiemermann; Ping Wang; W Joost Wiersinga; Xianzhong Xiao; Basilia Zingarelli
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  1 in total

1.  On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study.

Authors:  Jenna M Evans; Alexander Peever; Agnes Grudniewicz; Braedon McDonald; Asher A Mendelson; Manoj M Lalu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.