BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed the benefit or even need of hearing aids or cochlear implants in children with unilateral hearing loss to improve localization abilities and speech intelligibility. Therefore, the Audiology working group of the Austrian ENT society adopted the SAV-concept in 2017 (Screening Abklärung Versorgung von konnatalen Hörstörungen - Konzeptpapier 2017 AG Audiologie) to establish methods for testing, the mode of testing both ears, the desired schedule for the screening process and the subsequent therapy. METHODS: The screening data were collected via questionnaires sent to all maternity and neonatal wards in different districts by responsible persons of the Austrian ENT society. Data on the implementation of the SAV concept were evaluated retrospectively based on the responses for the regions of Lower Austria and Burgenland. RESULTS: The feedback, the implementation and responsibility for the screening program in respect of method and schedule differs throughout the federal states of Austria as well as in hospitals of state health organizations. CONCLUSION: Austria in comparison to other European countries is missing a central documentation and tracking system via a governmental screening coordination office as the data are not generally transferred to a common birth register. Therefore, different timetables and organization for the universal new born hearing screening in the federal states as well as in state organizations were found causing a delayed diagnosis and treatment of children with unilateral hearing loss.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed the benefit or even need of hearing aids or cochlear implants in children with unilateral hearing loss to improve localization abilities and speech intelligibility. Therefore, the Audiology working group of the Austrian ENT society adopted the SAV-concept in 2017 (Screening Abklärung Versorgung von konnatalen Hörstörungen - Konzeptpapier 2017 AG Audiologie) to establish methods for testing, the mode of testing both ears, the desired schedule for the screening process and the subsequent therapy. METHODS: The screening data were collected via questionnaires sent to all maternity and neonatal wards in different districts by responsible persons of the Austrian ENT society. Data on the implementation of the SAV concept were evaluated retrospectively based on the responses for the regions of Lower Austria and Burgenland. RESULTS: The feedback, the implementation and responsibility for the screening program in respect of method and schedule differs throughout the federal states of Austria as well as in hospitals of state health organizations. CONCLUSION: Austria in comparison to other European countries is missing a central documentation and tracking system via a governmental screening coordination office as the data are not generally transferred to a common birth register. Therefore, different timetables and organization for the universal new born hearing screening in the federal states as well as in state organizations were found causing a delayed diagnosis and treatment of children with unilateral hearing loss.
Authors: C P B van der Ploeg; N N Uilenburg; M A Kauffman-de Boer; A M Oudesluys-Murphy; P H Verkerk Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: J I Benito-Orejas; B Ramírez; D Morais; A Almaraz; J L Fernández-Calvo Journal: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 1.675