Yae Won Park1, Yohan Jun2, Yangho Lee2, Kyunghwa Han1, Chansik An3, Sung Soo Ahn4, Dosik Hwang5, Seung-Koo Lee1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. 2. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea. 3. Research and Analysis Team, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea. 4. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. sungsoo@yuhs.ac. 5. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea. dosik.hwang@yonsei.ac.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a deep learning (DL) model using both three-dimensional (3D) black-blood (BB) imaging and 3D gradient echo (GRE) imaging may improve the detection and segmentation performance of brain metastases compared to that using only 3D GRE imaging. METHODS: A total of 188 patients with brain metastases (917 lesions) who underwent a brain metastasis MRI protocol including contrast-enhanced 3D BB and 3D GRE were included in the training set. DL models based on 3D U-net were constructed. The models were validated in the test set consisting of 45 patients with brain metastases (203 lesions) and 49 patients without brain metastases. RESULTS: The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model yielded better performance than the 3D GRE model (sensitivities of 93.1% vs 76.8%, p < 0.001), and this effect was significantly stronger in subgroups with small metastases (p interaction < 0.001). For metastases < 3 mm, ≥ 3 mm and < 10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm, the sensitivities were 82.4%, 93.2%, and 100%, respectively. The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a false-positive per case of 0.59 in the test set. The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a Dice coefficient of 0.822, while 3D GRE model showed a lower Dice coefficient of 0.756. CONCLUSIONS: The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE DL model may improve the detection and segmentation performance of brain metastases, especially in detecting small metastases. KEY POINTS: • The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model yielded better performance for the detection of brain metastases than the 3D GRE model (p < 0.001), with sensitivities of 93.1% and 76.8%, respectively. • The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a false-positive rate per case of 0.59 in the test set. • The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a Dice coefficient of 0.822, while the 3D GRE model showed a lower Dice coefficient of 0.756.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a deep learning (DL) model using both three-dimensional (3D) black-blood (BB) imaging and 3D gradient echo (GRE) imaging may improve the detection and segmentation performance of brain metastases compared to that using only 3D GRE imaging. METHODS: A total of 188 patients with brain metastases (917 lesions) who underwent a brain metastasis MRI protocol including contrast-enhanced 3D BB and 3D GRE were included in the training set. DL models based on 3D U-net were constructed. The models were validated in the test set consisting of 45 patients with brain metastases (203 lesions) and 49 patients without brain metastases. RESULTS: The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model yielded better performance than the 3D GRE model (sensitivities of 93.1% vs 76.8%, p < 0.001), and this effect was significantly stronger in subgroups with small metastases (p interaction < 0.001). For metastases < 3 mm, ≥ 3 mm and < 10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm, the sensitivities were 82.4%, 93.2%, and 100%, respectively. The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a false-positive per case of 0.59 in the test set. The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a Dice coefficient of 0.822, while 3D GRE model showed a lower Dice coefficient of 0.756. CONCLUSIONS: The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE DL model may improve the detection and segmentation performance of brain metastases, especially in detecting small metastases. KEY POINTS: • The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model yielded better performance for the detection of brain metastases than the 3D GRE model (p < 0.001), with sensitivities of 93.1% and 76.8%, respectively. • The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a false-positive rate per case of 0.59 in the test set. • The combined 3D BB and 3D GRE model showed a Dice coefficient of 0.822, while the 3D GRE model showed a lower Dice coefficient of 0.756.
Entities:
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm metastasis