Meredith Doherty1, Daniel Gardner2, Jackie Finik3. 1. Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA. Dohertym@mskcc.org. 2. Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College City University of New York, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 3. Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Coping behaviors may play a mediating role in producing the negative health outcomes observed in financially burdened cancer patients and survivors. METHODS: Exploratory factor and latent class analysis of survey data. RESULTS: A total of 510 people completed the survey, ages ranged from 25 to over 75 [over half greater than 55 years old (57.8%)]. Most respondents identified as female (64.7%), white (70.8%), or African American (18.6%). A four-factor model of financial coping was revealed: care-altering, lifestyle-altering, self-advocacy, and financial help-seeking. Respondents grouped into three financial coping classes: low burden/low coping (n = 212), high self-advocacy (n = 143), and high burden/high coping (n = 155). African American respondents were at far greater odds than white respondents of being in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 5.82, 95% CI 3.01-6.64) or the self-advocacy class (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.19-2.80) than the low burden/low coping class. Compared to respondents aged 65 years and older, those 35-44 were more likely in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 12.27, 95% CI 7.03-19.87) and the high self-advocacy class (OR = 7.08, 95% CI 5.89-8.28) than the low burden/low coping class. CONCLUSION: One-third of respondents were in the high burden/high coping class. Age and race/ethnicity were significantly associated with class membership. Some coping strategies may compromise health and well-being. Program and policy interventions that reduce the odds that patients will use strategies that undermine treatment outcomes and increase patient use of protective strategies are needed.
PURPOSE: Coping behaviors may play a mediating role in producing the negative health outcomes observed in financially burdened cancerpatients and survivors. METHODS: Exploratory factor and latent class analysis of survey data. RESULTS: A total of 510 people completed the survey, ages ranged from 25 to over 75 [over half greater than 55 years old (57.8%)]. Most respondents identified as female (64.7%), white (70.8%), or African American (18.6%). A four-factor model of financial coping was revealed: care-altering, lifestyle-altering, self-advocacy, and financial help-seeking. Respondents grouped into three financial coping classes: low burden/low coping (n = 212), high self-advocacy (n = 143), and high burden/high coping (n = 155). African American respondents were at far greater odds than white respondents of being in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 5.82, 95% CI 3.01-6.64) or the self-advocacy class (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.19-2.80) than the low burden/low coping class. Compared to respondents aged 65 years and older, those 35-44 were more likely in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 12.27, 95% CI 7.03-19.87) and the high self-advocacy class (OR = 7.08, 95% CI 5.89-8.28) than the low burden/low coping class. CONCLUSION: One-third of respondents were in the high burden/high coping class. Age and race/ethnicity were significantly associated with class membership. Some coping strategies may compromise health and well-being. Program and policy interventions that reduce the odds that patients will use strategies that undermine treatment outcomes and increase patient use of protective strategies are needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Financial coping; Financial hardship; Health disparities; Quality of life; Supportive care
Authors: Christopher S Lathan; Angel Cronin; Reginald Tucker-Seeley; S Yousuf Zafar; John Z Ayanian; Deborah Schrag Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caitlin R Meeker; Daniel M Geynisman; Brian L Egleston; Michael J Hall; Karen Y Mechanic; Marijo Bilusic; Elizabeth R Plimack; Lainie P Martin; Margaret von Mehren; Bianca Lewis; Yu-Ning Wong Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Kathleen M Fenn; Suzanne B Evans; Ruth McCorkle; Michael P DiGiovanna; Lajos Pusztai; Tara Sanft; Erin W Hofstatter; Brigid K Killelea; M Tish Knobf; Donald R Lannin; Maysa Abu-Khalaf; Nina R Horowitz; Anees B Chagpar Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Alfred I Neugut; Milayna Subar; Elizabeth Ty Wilde; Scott Stratton; Corey H Brouse; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Victor R Grann; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Yousuf Zafar; Rebecca B McNeil; Catherine M Thomas; Christopher S Lathan; John Z Ayanian; Dawn Provenzale Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Stacie B Dusetzina; Aaron N Winn; Gregory A Abel; Haiden A Huskamp; Nancy L Keating Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Scott D Ramsey; Aasthaa Bansal; Catherine R Fedorenko; David K Blough; Karen A Overstreet; Veena Shankaran; Polly Newcomb Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; John A E Pottow; Kent A Griffith; Cathy Bradley; Ann S Hamilton; John Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Emeline M Aviki; Bridgette Thom; Kenya Braxton; Andrew J Chi; Beryl Manning-Geist; Fumiko Chino; Carol L Brown; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Francesca M Gany Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.359