Literature DB >> 33737689

Working for food is related to range use in free-range broiler chickens.

Vitor Hugo Bessa Ferreira1,2, Arthur Simoni3, Karine Germain4, Christine Leterrier5, Léa Lansade5, Anne Collin6, Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau6, Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval6, Elodie Guettier6, Hélène Leruste3, Ludovic Calandreau7, Vanessa Guesdon3.   

Abstract

When animals prefer to make efforts to obtain food instead of acquiring it from freely available sources, they exhibit what is called contrafreeloading. Recently, individual differences in behavior, such as exploration, were shown to be linked to how prone an individual may be to contrafreeload. In this work, our main objective was to test whether and how individual differences in range use of free-range broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) were related to the individual motivation to contrafreeload. We also verified whether other behavioral variations could relate to range use. To that aim, over three different periods (before range access, first weeks of range access, and last weeks of range access), chickens with different ranging levels (low and high rangers) were submitted to a contrafreeloading test and had different behaviors recorded (such as foraging, resting, locomotion) in their home environment. During the contrafreeloading test, chickens were conditioned to one chamber presenting a foraging substrate and mealworms, while in the other chamber, mealworms were freely available on the floor. During testing trials, chickens had access to both empty chambers, and the time spent in each chamber was quantified. On average, low rangers preferred the chamber where mealworms were easily accessible (without the foraging substrate), while high rangers preferred the chamber where mealworms were accessible with difficulty, showing greater contrafreeloading. Out of ten behaviors recorded in chickens' home environment, foraging was the only one that differed significantly between our two ranging groups, with low rangers foraging, on average, significantly less than high rangers. These results corroborate previous experiences suggesting that range use is probably linked to chickens' exploratory trait and suggest that individual differences in free-range broiler chickens are present even before range access. Increasing our knowledge of individual particularities is a necessary step to improve free-range chicken welfare on the farm.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33737689     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85867-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  27 in total

1.  Hemispheric processing of landmark and geometric information in male and female domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Luca Tommasi; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: evidence from a lopsided animal brain.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Piero Pagni; Valeria Anna Sovrano
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Working memory in the chick: parallel and lateralized mechanisms for encoding of object- and position-specific information.

Authors:  Lucia Regolin; Beatrice Garzotto; Rosa Rugani; Piero Pagni; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Domestication and stress effects on contrafreeloading and spatial learning performance in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers.

Authors:  Christina Lindqvist; Per Jensen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Early enrichment in free-range laying hens: effects on ranging behaviour, welfare and response to stressors.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; G N Hinch; J A Downing; C Lee
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Free and operant feeding in domestic fowls.

Authors:  I J Duncan; B O Hughes
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  G Vallortigara; M Zanforlin; G Pasti
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks.

Authors:  L Regolin; G Vallortigara
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-10

Review 10.  Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken.

Authors:  Lori Marino
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adaptability Challenges for Organic Broiler Chickens: A Commentary.

Authors:  Monica Guarino Amato; Cesare Castellini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Foraging Behavior Shows Individual-Consistency Over Time, and Predicts Range Use in Slow-Growing Free-Range Male Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Vitor Hugo Bessa Ferreira; Arthur Simoni; Karine Germain; Christine Leterrier; Léa Lansade; Anne Collin; Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau; Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval; Elodie Guettier; Hélène Leruste; Hanne Løvlie; Ludovic Calandreau; Vanessa Guesdon
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-07

3.  Environmental Complexity: Additional Human Visual Contact Reduced Meat Chickens' Fear of Humans and Physical Items Altered Pecking Behavior.

Authors:  Peta S Taylor; Paul H Hemsworth; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.