Literature DB >> 33736827

Apolipoprotein B and Non-HDL Cholesterol Better Reflect Residual Risk Than LDL Cholesterol in Statin-Treated Patients.

Camilla Ditlev Lindhardt Johannesen1, Martin Bødtker Mortensen2, Anne Langsted1, Børge Grønne Nordestgaard3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cholesterol guidelines, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remains the primary target while apolipoprotein B (apoB) and non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol are secondary targets.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine if elevated apoB and/or non-HDL cholesterol are superior to elevated LDL cholesterol in identifying statin-treated patients at residual risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction.
METHODS: In total, 13,015 statin-treated patients from the Copenhagen General Population Study were included with 8 years median follow-up. Cox regressions among apoB, non-HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, respectively, and all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction were examined on continuous scales by restricted cubic splines and by categories of concordant and discordant values defined by medians.
RESULTS: High apoB and non-HDL cholesterol were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction, whereas no such associations were found for high LDL cholesterol. Compared with concordant values below medians, discordant apoB above the median with LDL cholesterol below yielded hazard ratios of 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 1.36) for all-cause mortality and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.92) for myocardial infarction. Corresponding values for high non-HDL cholesterol with low LDL cholesterol were 1.18 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.36) and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.35 to 2.34). In contrast, discordant high LDL cholesterol with low apoB or non-HDL cholesterol was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction. Also, discordant high apoB with low non-HDL cholesterol yielded hazard ratios of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.41) for all-cause mortality and of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.40) for myocardial infarction. Furthermore, dual discordant apoB and non-HDL cholesterol above the medians with LDL cholesterol below presented hazard ratios of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.43) for all-cause mortality and 1.82 (95% CI: 1.37 to 2.42) for myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSIONS: In statin-treated patients, elevated apoB and non-HDL cholesterol, but not LDL cholesterol, are associated with residual risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. Discordance analysis demonstrates that apoB is a more accurate marker of all-cause mortality risk in statin-treated patients than LDL cholesterol or non-HDL cholesterol, and apoB in addition is a more accurate marker of risk of myocardial infarction than LDL cholesterol.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LDL cholesterol; apolipoprotein B; mortality; myocardial infarction; non-HDL cholesterol; statin treatment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33736827     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

1.  Association of Apolipoprotein B-Containing Lipoproteins and Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Individuals With and Without Atherosclerosis: Distinguishing Between Particle Concentration, Type, and Content.

Authors:  Nicholas A Marston; Robert P Giugliano; Giorgio E M Melloni; Jeong-Gun Park; Valerie Morrill; Michael A Blazing; Brian Ference; Evan Stein; Erik S Stroes; Eugene Braunwald; Patrick T Ellinor; Steven A Lubitz; Christian T Ruff; Marc S Sabatine
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 2.  Lipoprotein Assessment in the twenty-first Century.

Authors:  Diego Lucero; Anna Wolska; Zahra Aligabi; Sarah Turecamo; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.748

Review 3.  Integrating Advanced Lipid Testing and Biomarkers in Assessment and Treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Vaio Sykes; Neeja Patel; Danielle Lee; Pam R Taub
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.955

4.  Residual Risk of Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and Severity of Coronary Atherosclerosis Assessed by ApoB and LDL-C in Participants With Statin Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tianci Yao; Weilin Lu; Jinshan Ke; Hao Zhang; Xiaofang Zhao; Bei Song; Ting Liu; Qinmei Ke; Chengyun Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  Metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in health and dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  Jan Borén; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Elias Björnson; Chris J Packard
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 49.421

6.  Discordantly normal ApoB relative to elevated LDL-C in persons with metabolic disorders: A marker of atherogenic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Alexander C Razavi; Lydia A Bazzano; Jiang He; Marie Krousel-Wood; Kirsten S Dorans; Michael A Razavi; Camilo Fernandez; Seamus P Whelton; Tanika N Kelly
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-04

Review 7.  The dawn of a new era of targeted lipid-lowering therapies.

Authors:  Lale Tokgözoğlu; Peter Libby
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 35.855

Review 8.  Low Carbohydrate Dietary Approaches for People With Type 2 Diabetes-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sean D Wheatley; Trudi A Deakin; Nicola C Arjomandkhah; Paul B Hollinrake; Trudi E Reeves
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-07-15

9.  A randomized controlled clinical trial of cardiac telerehabilitation with a prolonged mobile care monitoring strategy after an acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Ernesto Dalli Peydró; Nuria Sanz Sevilla; María T Tuzón Segarra; Vicente Miró Palau; Jorge Sánchez Torrijos; Juan Cosín Sales
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.287

10.  Latin American Consensus on management of residual cardiometabolic risk. A consensus paper prepared by the Latin American Academy for the Study of Lipids and Cardiometabolic Risk (ALALIP) endorsed by the Inter-American Society of Cardiology (IASC), the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS), and the Pan-American College of Endothelium (PACE).

Authors:  Carlos I Ponte-Negretti; Fernando S Wyss; Daniel Piskorz; Raul D Santos; Raul Villar; Alberto Lorenzatti; Patricio López-Jaramillo; Peter P. Toth; A Juan J Amaro; Alfonso K Rodrigo; Fernando Lanas; Miguel Urina-Triana; Jofre Lara; T Osiris Valdés; José R Gomez-Mancebo; Alfonso Bryce; Leonardo Cobos S; Adriana Puente-Barragan; Vladimir E Ullauri-Solórzano; Felix A Medina-Palomino; Alfredo F Lozada; Maritza Duran; Percy Berrospi; David Miranda; Juan J Badimon; J José R González; Peter Libby
Journal:  Arch Cardiol Mex       Date:  2022-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.