Literature DB >> 33736679

Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for prediction of residual tumor size in early breast cancer within the ADAPT subtrials.

Monika Graeser1,2,3, Simone Schrading4, Oleg Gluz5,6,7, Kevin Strobel4, Christopher Herzog8, Lale Umutlu9, Alex Frydrychowicz10, Dorothea Rjosk-Dendorfer11, Rachel Würstlein5,12, Ralph Culemann13, Christine Eulenburg5, Jascha Adams14, Henrik Nitzsche6, Anna Prange15, Sherko Kümmel5,16,17, Eva-Maria Grischke18, Helmut Forstbauer19, Michael Braun20, Jochem Potenberg21, Raquel von Schumann6, Bahriye Aktas22,23, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke17,22, Nadia Harbeck5,12, Christiane K Kuhl4, Ulrike Nitz5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prediction of histological tumor size by post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated in different breast cancer subtypes.
METHODS: Imaging was performed after 12-week NAT in patients enrolled into three neoadjuvant WSG ADAPT subtrials. Imaging performance was analyzed for prediction of residual tumor measuring ≤10 mm and summarized using positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values.
RESULTS: A total of 248 and 588 patients had MRI and ultrasound, respectively. Tumor size was over- or underestimated by < 10 mm in 4.4% and 21.8% of patients by MRI and in 10.2% and 15.8% by ultrasound. Overall, NPV (proportion of correctly predicted tumor size ≤10 mm) of MRI and ultrasound was 0.92 and 0.83; PPV (correctly predicted tumor size > 10 mm) was 0.52 and 0.61. MRI demonstrated a higher NPV and lower PPV than ultrasound in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and in HR-/HER2+ tumors. Both methods had a comparable NPV and PPV in HR-/HER2- tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: In HR+/HER2+ and HR-/HER2+ breast cancer, MRI is less likely than ultrasound to underestimate while ultrasound is associated with a lower risk to overestimate tumor size. These findings may help to select the most optimal imaging approach for planning surgery after NAT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01815242 (registered on March 21, 2013), NCT01817452 (registered on March 25, 2013), and NCT01779206 (registered on January 30, 2013).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant therapy; Residual tumor size; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33736679      PMCID: PMC7977310          DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01413-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


  24 in total

1.  Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Randal Croshaw; Hilary Shapiro-Wright; Erik Svensson; Kathleen Erb; Thomas Julian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer.

Authors:  Eren Yeh; Priscilla Slanetz; Daniel B Kopans; Elizabeth Rafferty; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Linda Moy; Elkan Halpern; Richard Moore; Irene Kuter; Alphonse Taghian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Ulrike Nitz; Cornelia Liedtke; Matthias Christgen; Eva-Maria Grischke; Helmut Forstbauer; Michael Braun; Mathias Warm; John Hackmann; Christoph Uleer; Bahriye Aktas; Claudia Schumacher; Nikola Bangemann; Christoph Lindner; Sherko Kuemmel; Michael Clemens; Jochem Potenberg; Peter Staib; Andreas Kohls; Raquel von Schumann; Ronald Kates; Ronald Kates; Johannes Schumacher; Rachel Wuerstlein; Hans Heinrich Kreipe; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Current and future role of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Gottfried E Konecny; Stefan Paepke; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Does MRI predict pathologic tumor response in women with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy?

Authors:  Davendra Segara; Ian E Krop; Judy E Garber; Eric Winer; Lyndsay Harris; Jennifer R Bellon; Robyn Birdwell; Susan Lester; Stuart Lipsitz; J Dirk Iglehart; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  De-escalation strategies in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC): final analysis of the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- phase II trial: efficacy, safety, and predictive markers for 12 weeks of neoadjuvant dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab ± weekly paclitaxel.

Authors:  U A Nitz; O Gluz; M Christgen; E-M Grischke; D Augustin; S Kuemmel; M Braun; J Potenberg; A Kohls; K Krauss; A Stefek; C Schumacher; H Forstbauer; T Reimer; H Fischer; C Liedtke; R Wuerstlein; J Schumacher; R Kates; H Kreipe; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  WSG ADAPT - adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer: study protocol for a prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-blinded, randomized, investigator initiated phase II/III trial.

Authors:  Daniel Hofmann; Ulrike Nitz; Oleg Gluz; Ronald E Kates; Timo Schinkoethe; Peter Staib; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  M B I Lobbes; R Prevos; M Smidt; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M van Goethem; R Schipper; R G Beets-Tan; J E Wildberger
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-01-29

9.  Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Marinovich; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Francesco Sardanelli; Eleftherios Mamounas; Gunter von Minckwitz; Valentina Guarneri; Savannah C Partridge; Frances C Wright; Jae Hyuck Choi; Madhumita Bhattacharyya; Laura Martincich; Eren Yeh; Viviana Londero; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Radiologic complete response (rCR) in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer predicts recurrence-free survival but not pathologic complete response (pCR).

Authors:  Simon Peter Gampenrieder; Andreas Peer; Christian Weismann; Matthias Meissnitzer; Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Johanna Webhofer; Theresa Westphal; Marina Riedmann; Thomas Meissnitzer; Heike Egger; Frederike Klaassen Federspiel; Roland Reitsamer; Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Katharina Stering; Klaus Hergan; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Richard Greil
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.