Jou-Chun Chou1, Jie-Hau Li2, Chih-Chieh Chen2,3, Chien-Wei Chen4, Ho Lin1, Paulus S Wang2,5,6,7. 1. Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung. 2. Department of Physiology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei. 3. Department of Nutrition, China Medical University, Taichung. 4. College of Human Development and Health, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei. 5. Medical Center of Aging Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung. 6. Department of Biotechnology, College of Health Science, Asia University, Taichung. 7. Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac glycosides (CGs) possess a chemical structure similar to steroids, and are inhibitors of the sodium potassium pump. An anti-tumor effect of CGs in breast and prostate cancers has been reported, but the effect of CGs on ovarian cancer is still unclear. AIMS: In this study, the effects of CGs on proliferation, cytotoxicity and cell cycle of ovarian cancer cell line (SKOV-3) have been investigated. PROCEDURE: The cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were detected by MTT assay and LDH activity assay, respectively. CGs, at concentrations higher than IC50, decreased cell proliferation and showed increased cytotoxicity toward SKOV-3 cells. The colony-formation ability was reduced after treatment with digoxin and digitoxin for 10 days. Furthermore, we explored the effect of digoxin and digitoxin on the distribution of cell cycle by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Results revealed that both digoxin and digitoxin led to cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase with 24 or 48 hours, but the arrest of G0/G1 phase was not observed at 72 hours. We evaluated the percentage of hypodiploid cell population as an index of the cellular fragments through flow cytometry. The data indicated that cellular fragments were significantly increased by treating with digitoxin at the concentrations of IC50 and 10-6 M for 72 hours. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these data suggest that CGs decreased cell proliferation and increased cytotoxicity through cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. CGs have anti-tumor effect in SKOV-3 cells and might be a potential therapeutic drug for ovarian cancer. Since this study is a preliminary investigation of CGs on SKOV-3 cells, more experiments might be performed in the future. Furthermore, more ovarian cancer cell lines might also be employed in the future studies to confirm the effect of CGs in ovarian cancer.
BACKGROUND:Cardiac glycosides (CGs) possess a chemical structure similar to steroids, and are inhibitors of the sodium potassium pump. An anti-tumor effect of CGs in breast and prostate cancers has been reported, but the effect of CGs on ovarian cancer is still unclear. AIMS: In this study, the effects of CGs on proliferation, cytotoxicity and cell cycle of ovarian cancer cell line (SKOV-3) have been investigated. PROCEDURE: The cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were detected by MTT assay and LDH activity assay, respectively. CGs, at concentrations higher than IC50, decreased cell proliferation and showed increased cytotoxicity toward SKOV-3 cells. The colony-formation ability was reduced after treatment with digoxin and digitoxin for 10 days. Furthermore, we explored the effect of digoxin and digitoxin on the distribution of cell cycle by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Results revealed that both digoxin and digitoxin led to cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase with 24 or 48 hours, but the arrest of G0/G1 phase was not observed at 72 hours. We evaluated the percentage of hypodiploid cell population as an index of the cellular fragments through flow cytometry. The data indicated that cellular fragments were significantly increased by treating with digitoxin at the concentrations of IC50 and 10-6 M for 72 hours. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these data suggest that CGs decreased cell proliferation and increased cytotoxicity through cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. CGs have anti-tumor effect in SKOV-3 cells and might be a potential therapeutic drug for ovarian cancer. Since this study is a preliminary investigation of CGs on SKOV-3 cells, more experiments might be performed in the future. Furthermore, more ovarian cancer cell lines might also be employed in the future studies to confirm the effect of CGs in ovarian cancer.
Ovarian cancer is the deadliest disease in gynecologic malignancies. Different from
breast cancer, ovarian cancer lacks early stage diagnostic markers and
non-significant symptoms until cancer cells have metastasized, and then cause a poor
survival rate.[1] Clinical data point out that steroid hormones promote proliferation,
metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).[2] Progesterone is a potent hormone to inhibit ovarian cancer cell growth
whereas estrogen may be a risk factor of ovarian cancer deterioration.[3] Estrogens, one of steroid hormones, play an important role in proliferation
and development of the ovary.[4] The biofunctions of estrogen are through binding to estrogen receptor (ER)α
and ERβ.[5] Estradiol (E2) enhances cell proliferation through activating ERα-regulated
gene (IGFBP3).[6] On the contrary, ERβ agonists liquiritigenin and S-equol inhibit cell growth,
migration and invasion and induce cell apoptosis.[1]The chemical structure of cardiac glycosides is similar to steroids; they are also
known as cardiac steroid glycosides.[7] Cardiac glycosides (CG) including digoxin, digitoxin, and ouabain are
inhibitors of the sodium potassium pump, and have been used in heart failure for a
long time.[8] CGs also inhibit testosterone production via the attenuation of cAMP
accumulation, activities of adenylyl cyclase and cytochrome P450scc in
rat testicular cells[9-11] and
progesterone release by rat granulosa cells via a Na+,
K+-ATPase-independent mechanism involving the inhibition of post-cAMP
pathway cytochrome P450scc and the protein function of steroidogenic
acute regulatory (StAR) protein.[12] CGs have been known to possess anticancer effects in endocrine-related
cancers comprising lung cancer,[13] prostate cancer,[14-17] and breast cancer[18] through inhibiting the cell migration[19] and proliferation and inducing apoptosis.[20,21] CG induces cell apoptosis in
MCF-7 (estrogen receptor positive-breast cancer cell line) and MDA-MB-468
(triple-negative breast cancer) through arresting the G0/G1 phase.[22] On the other hand, ingesting CG for a long time may increase the risk of
breast cancer, which is caused by the similar structures of CG and estrogen.
Digitoxin and bufalin are reported to decrease the cell migration or cell growth
through changing the microenvironment and suppression of the ITGB2/FAK pathway in
ovarian cancer.[6,19] Comprehensively, there are 2 opinions for the inhibitory effect
of CG on estrogen receptor in breast cancer, one is antitumor, the other one is
tumor promotion. It has been known that ovarian cancer is an estrogenic hormone
related cancer.[23] However, the effect of CG on ovarian cancer is not clearly known.In this study, the dual effects of CG, both stimulatory and suppressive, at low and
high concentrations in the ovarian cancer have been investigated. We examined cell
proliferation and cytotoxicity after administration of CG in ovarian cancer cells.
Furthermore, the cell cycle distribution was detected following treatments with
digoxin and digitoxin.
Meterials and Methods
Cell Line and Reagents
Human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 was purchased from American Type Culture
Collection(ATCC®). Digoxin, digitoxin, ouabain,
MTT(3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and propidium
iodide were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Cell Culture
SKOV3 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium (Gibico Laboratories, Buffalo, Grand
Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovin serum (Gibico Laboratories, Buffalo,
Grand Island, NY, USA), 1.5 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 1% penicillin and
streptomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and refreshed media per 3 or 4 days.
Cells were incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.
Cell Proliferation Assay
The effect of CGs (including digoxin, digitoxin, and ouabain) on cell
proliferation was measured by MTT assay. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates
(2.0 × 103 cells per well) and incubated in a 5% CO2
incubator at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, cells were treated with or
without CGs in a dose dependent manner for 24 or 48 hours. Serum free media
containing 1.0 mg/ml MTT solution was added to 96-well plates (100 μl per well)
and incubated for 3 hours in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. DMSO was
used to solubilize formazan crystals and the optical density (O.D.) was detected
by ELISA reader at O.D. 570 nm absorbance with 620 nm as the wavelength
reference.
Cytotoxicity Assay
The cell cytotoxicity effect of CGs was detected through LDH-Cytotoxicity Assay
Kit II (BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates
(2.0 × 104 cells per well) and incubated in a 5% CO2
incubator at 37°C for 24 hours. After cells adhesion, cells were treated with
200 μl fresh medium with or without CGs for 24 hours. The administrations were
descripted as the following:(a) low control (medium only), high control (10% cell lysis solution)(b) 200 μl fresh medium (without cells)(c) 200 μl fresh medium (containing 0.1% DMSO)(d) 200 μl fresh medium (containing 10−9-10−4 M
digoxin)(e) 200 μl fresh medium (containing 10−9-10−4 M
digitoxin)After incubation for 24 hours, 10 μl media obtained from (a) to (e) were mixed
with 100 μl LDH after incubation in 96-well plates at room temperature under
dark for 30 minutes. In the ELISA reader, the cytotoxicity was monitored at
450 nm absorbance with 630 nm as the wavelength reference.
Colony Forming Assay
Cells were seeded in 6-well plates with 5.0 × 102 cells per well.
After cell adhesion, cells were treated with or without CGs for 10 days. Cells
were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed by 100% methanol for
10 minutes at room temperature. Meanwhile, 0.5% crystal violet was used to stain
cells for 15 minutes at room temperature and then cells were washed with
ddH2O. The images of colonies were captured by camera and then
dissolved crystal violet with 500 μl DMSO per well. The quantification of the
number of colonies was measured by ELISA reader at 595 nm.
Flow Cytometry
Cells were seeded in 10 cm culture dish with 1.0 × 106 cells per dish
and incubated overnight. After cell adhesion, cells were treated with or without
CGs containing digoxin and digitoxin for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Cells were
harvested and washed twice with PBS. Cells were fixed with 1 ml 70% ethanol at
−20°C overnight. After cells were resuspended in 1.0 ml 0.1% PBS containing
0.05 mg/ml Triton X-100 and 0.25 mg/ml propidium iodide, cells were incubated at
37°C for 15 minutes. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at 488 nm excitation
wavelength.
Statistical Analysis
All results were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). One-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the difference among all groups
and then followed by Duncan’s multiple range test to analyze the difference
between control and treatment groups.[24] The P value <.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Results
The Inhibitory Effect of CGs on Cell Proliferation in SKOV-3 Cells
The cell proliferation effect of CGs containing digoxin, digitoxin and ouabain
was determined by MTT assay. SKOV-3 cells were treated with a series of
concentrations of CGs for 24 and 48 hours. Cell proliferation was slightly
increased at 10−9 to 10−8 M digoxin for 24 and 48 hours
compared with control group, respectively. The inhibitory effect of CGs on cell
proliferation in SKOV-3 after 24 and 48 hours treatment with 10−7 to
10−4 M digoxin was comparable with control group. The inhibitory
percentage of cell proliferation was decreased by 54% and 82% in 10−6
and 10−5 to 10−4 M digoxin for 24 hours, respectively. The
inhibitory percentage of cell proliferation was decreased by 86% and 95% in
10−6 and 10−5 to 10−4 M digoxin for
48 hours, respectively (Figure
1A). The similar phenomenon was observed in digitoxin and ouabain
treated groups. The cell proliferation was decreased significantly after
treatment with 10−6 to 10−4 M and 10−7 to
10−4 M digitoxin for 24 and 48 hours, respectively (Figure 1B). In the
ouabain-treated group, the data showed that cell proliferation was inhibited
significantly from 10−6 M to 10−4 M for 24 and 48 hours.
Different from the results of digoxin and digitoxin, the cell proliferation was
siginificantly increased by ouabain at the concentration of 10−9 to
10−8 M (Figure
1C). Taken together, these results showed that the response of cell
proliferation was in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner (Figure 1A-C). The half
maximal inhibitory concentration values (IC50) calculated from dose-response
curves for digoxin and digitoxin were 2.5 × 10−7 M and
4.0 × 10−7 M, respectively, and these concentration values were
used in follow-up experiments (Figure 1D).
Figure 1.
Effects of CGs on proliferation of SKOV-3 cells. SKOV-3 cells were
incubated with (A) digoxin (B) digitoxin and (C) ouabain at different
concentrations for 24 and 48 hours. (D) Half maximal inhibitory
concentration (IC50) of digoxin and digitoxin.
Cell proliferation was analyzed by MTT assay. Each value represents
mean ± SEM. These experiments were repeated 3 to 4 times.
Effects of CGs on proliferation of SKOV-3 cells. SKOV-3 cells were
incubated with (A) digoxin (B) digitoxin and (C) ouabain at different
concentrations for 24 and 48 hours. (D) Half maximal inhibitory
concentration (IC50) of digoxin and digitoxin.Cell proliferation was analyzed by MTT assay. Each value represents
mean ± SEM. These experiments were repeated 3 to 4 times.
Digoxin and Digitoxin Suppressed Colony Formation
Accordding to the above observations, digoxin, and digitoxin have been
demonstrated to play an important role in antitumor effect. We then investigated
whether CGs affect the colony-forming abilities. The cell growth was observed
after 10-day treatment with CGs. We found that CGs significantly decreased the
colony-forming abilities by 50% to 60% when higher concentration (greater than
IC50) of CGs was employed (Figure 2A and B).
Figure 2.
Effects of CGs on colonies formation of SKOV-3 cells. Cells were
incubated with indicated concentrations of (A) digoxin and (B) digitoxin
for 10 days. Colony-forming ability was compared with the control
group.
Each value represents mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
*P < .05, **P < .01 as compared
with control group.
Effects of CGs on colonies formation of SKOV-3 cells. Cells were
incubated with indicated concentrations of (A) digoxin and (B) digitoxin
for 10 days. Colony-forming ability was compared with the control
group.Each value represents mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.*P < .05, **P < .01 as compared
with control group.
The Cytotoxicity of Digoxin and Digitoxin on SKOV-3 Cells
Our results showed that CGs had antitumor effect. To further investigate the
antitumor effect of CGs on cell cytotoxicity, SKOV-3 cells were treated with
different concentrations of digoxin and digitoxin for 24 hours and the quantity
of LDH were measured as the reference of cell death rate. The cytotoxicity was
significantly increased about 13 folds in 10−4 M digoxin-treated
group compared with control group (Figure 3A). In 10−5 and
10−4 M digitoxin-treated groups, the cytotoxicity was
significantly increased 15 and 16 folds, respectively (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.
CGs induced cytotoxicity in SKOV-3 cells. Cells were incubated in 96 well
plate for 24 hours. After adhesion, cells were exposed to (A) digoxin
and (B) digitoxin at indicated concentrations for 24 hours. The quantity
of LDH in culture medium was measured by ELISA reader. The ratio of
cytotoxicity was compared with control group.
Each value represents mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
**P < .01 as compared with control group.
CGs induced cytotoxicity in SKOV-3 cells. Cells were incubated in 96 well
plate for 24 hours. After adhesion, cells were exposed to (A) digoxin
and (B) digitoxin at indicated concentrations for 24 hours. The quantity
of LDH in culture medium was measured by ELISA reader. The ratio of
cytotoxicity was compared with control group.Each value represents mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.**P < .01 as compared with control group.
Digoxin and Digitoxin Arrest SKOV-3 Cells at G0/G1
After exposure to digoxin and digitoxin with IC50 and
10−6 M for 24, 48, and 72 hours, SKOV-3 cells showed an arrest at the
G0/G1 phase reaching 80% with digoxin (IC50) for 48 hours. Digoxin treatment
with 10−6 M for 24 and 48 hours led the accumulation of SKOV-3 cells
at the G0/G1 phase with 72% and 76%, respectively (Figure 4A). We found similar phenomenon
in digitoxin-treated groups. The cell cycle arrested at the G0/G1 phase with 77%
and 73% after administration of digitoxin at IC50 for 24 and 48 hours,
respectively. Digitoxin treatment induced cells arrests at the G0/G1 phase with
74% and 78% at 10−6 M for 24 and 48 hours, respectively (Figure 4B). However, both
digoxin- and digitoxin-induced cell cycle arrests in the G0/G1 phase were not
observed after 72 hours. Therefore, we detected the distribution of hypodiploid
cell population. We found that the percentage of hypodiploid was siginificantly
increased by 5 and 8 folds after treatment with digitoxin at IC50 and
10−6 M for 72 hours, respectively (Figure 4C).
Figure 4.
Distribution of digoxin and digitoxin on cell cycle in SKOV-3 cells.
Cells were exposed to (A) digoxin and (B) digitoxin at indicated
concentrations for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Flow cytometric analysis was
used to detect DNA contents. Percentages of cells in the G0/G1 phase
were presented. (C) The percentage of hypodiploid cells incubated with
digitoxin at indicated concentrations for 24, 48, and 72 hours were
measured under the sub-G1 fraction.
Each value represents mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
**P < .01 as compared with control group.
Distribution of digoxin and digitoxin on cell cycle in SKOV-3 cells.
Cells were exposed to (A) digoxin and (B) digitoxin at indicated
concentrations for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Flow cytometric analysis was
used to detect DNA contents. Percentages of cells in the G0/G1 phase
were presented. (C) The percentage of hypodiploid cells incubated with
digitoxin at indicated concentrations for 24, 48, and 72 hours were
measured under the sub-G1 fraction.Each value represents mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.**P < .01 as compared with control group.
Discussion
Recent studies displayed that CGs have anti-tumor effect in several cancers,[25] such as breast and prostate cancer. The core structure of CGs is similar to
steroid hormones and it has been known that long-term ingestion of CGs induces
higher risk of breast cancer, cervical cancer and some estrogen-sensitive cancers.[26] However, this phenomenon is not significant in ovarian cancer, which is low
in sensitivity to estrogen.[27] CGs inhibit cell proliferation in many cancers through different mechanisms.[28] For example, bufalin induced apoptosis by increasing the protein level of Fas
and p53 in LNCaP cells, an androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line, but not in
DU145 and PC3 cells, the androgen-independent prostate cell lines. Both DU145 and
PC3 cells are p53-mutation cell lines which is the reason why bufalin has no effect
on these 2 prostate cancer cell lines.[15]It has been known that digitalis has dual effects of cell proliferation and cell
death in human fibroblasts and HeLa cells.[7,29] Our results also showed that
cell proliferation was increased slightly at 1 to 10 nM after treatment with digoxin
or digitoxin in SKOV-3 cells. The cell proliferation was significantly increased
when SKOV-3 cells exposed to ouabain at concentrations less than 10 nM for 24 and
48 hours. On the other hand, treatment of high concentration of CGs (eg, 100 nM)
significantly decreased cell proliferation in SKOV-3 cells. Similar results have
been reported in breast cancer.[30] Some reports advocated a stimulatory effect of CGs at low concentrations on
cell proliferation in vascular smooth muscle and prostatic smooth muscle
cells.[31,32] The stimulatory effect of CGs on cells growth might through
activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. The protein level of
phospho-Erk1/2 was higher after administration of 30 nM digoxin and ouabain as
compared to the control.[33] Taken together, we demonstrated that digoxin, digitoxin, and oubain play a
dual role on cell growth in SKOV-3 cells.Treatment with CGs at high concentration inhibited Na/K-ATPase, but increased the
intracellular calcium concentration. In cancer cells, high intracellular calcium
concentration induced cytochrome c release and caspase 3 activation to induce cell death.[34] The anti-cancer effect of CGs in ovarian cancer was through inhibiting cell
migration and angiogenesis.[19] In this study, we demonstrated that CGs induced cell death and inhibited cell
proliferation through cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase.Our results first demonstrated that digoxin treatment led to cell cycle arrest at the
G0/G1 phase in SKOV-3 cells. It has been reported that CGs arrest the cell cycle in
many cancers including glioblastoma,[35] breast,[22] ovarian,[28] and bladder cancers.[36] Digoxin treatment causes cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 and G2/M phase for
Raji and NAMALWA cells, and Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines, respectively. These
results suggested that the same administration for the same type of cancer but
different cell lines might lead to cells arrested at different phases of the cell cycle.[37] In ovarian cancer cells, it has been reported that bufalin and digitoxinarrest cell cycle at the G0/G1 and G2/M phases, respectively.[28,38] Recently, it
has been shown that digoxin and digitoxin create anti-cancer effects on
hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting the cell viability and migration.[39] It is apparent that not only reproduction-related cancers, but also the
cancers of other systems are affected by digoxin and digitoxin. Taken together,
these reports point out that the different drugs or chemicals and different exposure
time led to a specific effect on ovarian cancer. Therefore, we investigated the
distribution of cell cycle after treatment with digoxin for 24, 48, and 72 hours. We
found that digoxin and digitoxin induced G0/G1 phase arrest at 24 and 48 hours. When
the cell cycle was arrested at the G0/G1 phase longer than 72 hours, cell debris was
significantly increased. These results indicated that digoxin- and digitoxin-induced
cell death in SKOV-3 cells was positively related to exposure time.In summary, the present study demonstrated that digoxin and digitoxin inhibited cell
growth through arresting the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase and increasing
cytotoxicity (Figure 5).
The results also showed the dual effect on cell growth after treatment with oubain
for 24 and 48 hours. To confirm the anti-cancer effect of CGs on ovarian cancer
cells, more ovarian cancer cell lines may be administered with CGs. A study of cell
apoptosis measured by flow cytometry is suggested to explore the inhibitiory
mechanisms of CGs on ovarian cancer cells.
Figure 5.
Summary of the effect of digoxin and digitoxin on SKOV-3 cells. Digoxin and
digitoxin treatment inhibited the ability of colonies formation and cell
proliferation. The cytotoxicity was increased after administration with
digoxin or digitoxin for 24 hours. CGs led to cell cycle arrest at G0/G1
phase.
Summary of the effect of digoxin and digitoxin on SKOV-3 cells. Digoxin and
digitoxin treatment inhibited the ability of colonies formation and cell
proliferation. The cytotoxicity was increased after administration with
digoxin or digitoxin for 24 hours. CGs led to cell cycle arrest at G0/G1
phase.
Authors: Courtney L Andersen; Matthew J Sikora; Michelle M Boisen; Tianzhou Ma; Alec Christie; George Tseng; Yongseok Park; Soumya Luthra; Uma Chandran; Paul Haluska; Gina M Mantia-Smaldone; Kunle Odunsi; Karen McLean; Adrian V Lee; Esther Elishaev; Robert P Edwards; Steffi Oesterreich Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wei-Lun Chen; Yulin Ren; Jinhong Ren; Christian Erxleben; Michael E Johnson; Saverio Gentile; A Douglas Kinghorn; Steven M Swanson; Joanna E Burdette Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: S Cunat; F Rabenoelina; J-P Daurès; D Katsaros; H Sasano; W R Miller; T Maudelonde; P Pujol Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: H Lin; S W Wang; S C Tsai; J J Chen; Y C Chiao; C C Lu; W J Huang; G J Wang; C F Chen; P S Wang Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 8.739