Literature DB >> 3373577

The current status of undergraduate urological teaching.

S N Rous1, C Lancaster.   

Abstract

At the request of the Society of University Urologists a survey of urological teaching at 113 United States medical schools was done. The most distressing finding was that more than two-thirds (68 per cent) of the schools do not require any clinical exposure to urology before graduation. In view of the fact that urology is rarely, if ever, taught in any of the primary care disciplines after graduation, it is suggested that patient care may well suffer for this shortcoming in our medical education curriculum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3373577     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42846-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

Review 1.  Urology in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Marianne Casilla-Lennon; Piruz Motamedinia
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The gatekeeper disparity--why do some medical schools send more medical students into urology?

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Jason Bonslaver; Jessica T Casey; Justin Degrado; Beau N Dusseault; Janelle A Fox; Desri Lashley-Rogers; Ingride Richardson; Marc C Smaldone; Peter L Steinberg; Deep B Trivedi; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Attitudes of GP trainees towards the training received in urology on the GP training scheme.

Authors:  E J Redmond; N P Kelly; C McCarthy; E Ní Mhurchú; H Hayes; C Flynn; D O'Shea; S K Giri; H D Flood
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 1.568

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.