Sophie Richter1, Stefan Winzeck1,2, Evgenios N Kornaropoulos1, Tilak Das3, Thijs Vande Vyvere4,5, Jan Verheyden5, Guy B Williams6, Marta M Correia7, David K Menon1, Virginia F J Newcombe1. 1. University Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 2. BioMedIA, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Radiology, University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 5. Research and Development, icometrix, Leuven, Belgium. 6. Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 7. MRC (Medical Research Council) Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Importance: Persistent symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) represent a major public health problem. Objective: To identify neuroanatomical substrates of mTBI and the optimal timing for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective multicenter cohort study encompassed all eligible patients from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study (December 19, 2014, to December 17, 2017) and a local cohort (November 20, 2012, to December 19, 2013). Patients presented to the hospital within 24 hours of an mTBI (Glasgow Coma Score, 13-15), satisfied local criteria for computed tomographic scanning, and underwent MRI scanning less than 72 hours (MR1) and 2 to 3 weeks (MR2) after injury. In addition, 104 control participants were enrolled across all sites. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Exposure: Mild TBI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Volumes and diffusion parameters were extracted via automated bespoke pipelines. Symptoms were measured using the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire in the short term and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months. Results: Among the 81 patients included in the analysis (73 CENTER-TBI and 8 local), the median age was 45 (interquartile range [IQR], 24-59; range, 14-85) years, and 57 (70.4%) were male. Structural sequences were available for all scans; diffusion data, for 73 MR1 and 79 MR2 scans. After adjustment for multiple comparisons between scans, visible lesions did not differ significantly, but cerebral white matter volume decreased (MR2:MR1 ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and ventricular volume increased (MR2:MR1 ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10). White matter volume was within reference limits on MR1 scans (patient to control ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.01) and reduced on MR2 scans (patient to control ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99). Diffusion parameters changed significantly between scans in 13 tracts, following 1 of 3 trajectories. Symptoms measured by Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire scores worsened in the progressive injury phenotype (median, +5.00; IQR, +2.00 to +5.00]), improved in the minimal change phenotype (median, -4.50; IQR, -9.25 to +1.75), and were variable in the pseudonormalization phenotype (median, 0.00; IQR, -6.25 to +9.00) (P = .02). Recovery was favorable for 33 of 65 patients (51%) and was more closely associated with MR1 than MR2 (area under the curve, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78-0.96] vs 0.75 [95% CI, 0.62-0.87]; P = .009). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that advanced MRI reveals potential neuroanatomical substrates of mTBI in white matter and is most strongly associated with odds of recovery if performed within 72 hours, although future validation is required.
Importance: Persistent symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) represent a major public health problem. Objective: To identify neuroanatomical substrates of mTBI and the optimal timing for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective multicenter cohort study encompassed all eligible patients from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study (December 19, 2014, to December 17, 2017) and a local cohort (November 20, 2012, to December 19, 2013). Patients presented to the hospital within 24 hours of an mTBI (Glasgow Coma Score, 13-15), satisfied local criteria for computed tomographic scanning, and underwent MRI scanning less than 72 hours (MR1) and 2 to 3 weeks (MR2) after injury. In addition, 104 control participants were enrolled across all sites. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Exposure: Mild TBI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Volumes and diffusion parameters were extracted via automated bespoke pipelines. Symptoms were measured using the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire in the short term and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months. Results: Among the 81 patients included in the analysis (73 CENTER-TBI and 8 local), the median age was 45 (interquartile range [IQR], 24-59; range, 14-85) years, and 57 (70.4%) were male. Structural sequences were available for all scans; diffusion data, for 73 MR1 and 79 MR2 scans. After adjustment for multiple comparisons between scans, visible lesions did not differ significantly, but cerebral white matter volume decreased (MR2:MR1 ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and ventricular volume increased (MR2:MR1 ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10). White matter volume was within reference limits on MR1 scans (patient to control ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.01) and reduced on MR2 scans (patient to control ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99). Diffusion parameters changed significantly between scans in 13 tracts, following 1 of 3 trajectories. Symptoms measured by Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire scores worsened in the progressive injury phenotype (median, +5.00; IQR, +2.00 to +5.00]), improved in the minimal change phenotype (median, -4.50; IQR, -9.25 to +1.75), and were variable in the pseudonormalization phenotype (median, 0.00; IQR, -6.25 to +9.00) (P = .02). Recovery was favorable for 33 of 65 patients (51%) and was more closely associated with MR1 than MR2 (area under the curve, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78-0.96] vs 0.75 [95% CI, 0.62-0.87]; P = .009). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that advanced MRI reveals potential neuroanatomical substrates of mTBI in white matter and is most strongly associated with odds of recovery if performed within 72 hours, although future validation is required.
Authors: Frederick K Korley; W Frank Peacock; James T Eckner; Ronald Maio; Scott Levin; Kathleen T Bechtold; Matthew Peters; Durga Roy; Hayley J Falk; Anna J Hall; Timothy E Van Meter; Richard Gonzalez; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Joukje van der Naalt; Marieke E Timmerman; Myrthe E de Koning; Harm J van der Horn; Myrthe E Scheenen; Bram Jacobs; Gerard Hageman; Tansel Yilmaz; Gerwin Roks; Jacoba M Spikman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Catherine M Lunter; Ellen L Carroll; Charlotte Housden; Joanne Outtrim; Faye Forsyth; Annie Rivera; Chris Maimaris; Adrian Boyle; Barbara J Sahakian; David K Menon; Virginia Fj Newcombe Journal: Emerg Med Australas Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 2.151
Authors: Ana Mikolić; Suzanne Polinder; Ewout W Steyerberg; Isabel R A Retel Helmrich; Joseph T Giacino; Andrew I R Maas; Joukje van der Naalt; Daphne C Voormolen; Nicole von Steinbüchel; Lindsay Wilson; Hester F Lingsma; David van Klaveren Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Elizabeth B Hutchinson; Susan C Schwerin; Alexandru V Avram; Sharon L Juliano; Carlo Pierpaoli Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Sophie Richter; Susan Stevenson; Tom Newman; Lindsay Wilson; David K Menon; Andrew I R Maas; Daan Nieboer; Hester Lingsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Virginia F J Newcombe Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Virginia F J Newcombe; Nicholas J Ashton; Jussi P Posti; Ben Glocker; Anne Manktelow; Doris A Chatfield; Stefan Winzeck; Edward Needham; Marta M Correia; Guy B Williams; Joel Simrén; Riikka S K Takala; Ari J Katila; Henna Riikka Maanpää; Jussi Tallus; Janek Frantzén; Kaj Blennow; Olli Tenovuo; Henrik Zetterberg; David K Menon Journal: Brain Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 15.255