Literature DB >> 33734150

Lung Navigation Ventilation Protocol to Optimize Biopsy of Peripheral Lung Lesions.

Krish Bhadra1, Randolph M Setser2, William Condra1, Michael A Pritchett3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography-to-body divergence caused by respiratory motion, atelectasis, diaphragmatic motion and other factors is an obstacle to peripheral lung biopsies. We examined a conventional ventilation strategy versus a lung navigation ventilation protocol (LNVP) optimized for intraprocedural 3-dimensional image acquisition and bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung nodules.
METHODS: A retrospective, single center study was conducted in consecutive subjects with peripheral lung lesions measuring <30 mm. Effects of ventilation strategies including atelectasis and tool-in-lesion confirmation were assessed using cone beam computed tomography images. Diagnostic yield was also evaluated. Complications were assessed through 7 days.
RESULTS: Fifty subjects were included (25 per group) with 27 nodules in the conventional group and 25 nodules in the LNVP group. Atelectasis was assessed by 2 blinded readers: [reader 1 (R1) and reader 2 (R2)]. Atelectasis was more prevalent in the conventional ventilation group, both for dependent atelectasis (R1: 64% and R2: 68% vs. R1: 36% and R2: 16%, P=0.00014) and sublobar/lobar atelectasis (R1: 48% and R2: 56% vs. R1: 20% and R2: 32%, P=0.01). Similarly, the target lesion was obscured due to atelectasis more often in the conventional ventilation group (R1: 36% and R2: 36% vs. R1: 4% and R2: 8%, P=0.01). Diagnostic yield was 70% for conventional ventilation and 92% for LNVP (P=0.08).
CONCLUSION: LNVP demonstrated markedly reduced dependent and sublobar/lobar atelectasis and lesions either partially or completely obscured by atelectasis compared with conventional ventilation. Future prospective studies are necessary to understand the impact of protocolized ventilation strategies for bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung lesions.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 33734150     DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol        ISSN: 1948-8270


  4 in total

1.  Should We Start With Navigation or Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy?: Insights From Monte Carlo Simulations.

Authors:  Michael N Kammer; Brent E Heideman; Fabien Maldonado
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 10.262

2.  Three-dimensional catheter navigation of airways using continuous-sweep limited angle fluoroscopy on a C-arm.

Authors:  Martin G Wagner; Sarvesh Periyasamy; Sebastian Schafer; Paul F Laeseke; Michael A Speidel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-10-15

3.  Combining Shape-Sensing Robotic Bronchoscopy With Mobile Three-Dimensional Imaging to Verify Tool-in-Lesion and Overcome Divergence: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Janani Reisenauer; Jennifer D Duke; Ryan Kern; Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy; Eric Edell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 4.  Anesthesia considerations to reduce motion and atelectasis during advanced guided bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Michael A Pritchett; Kelvin Lau; Scott Skibo; Karen A Phillips; Krish Bhadra
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.317

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.