Literature DB >> 33734028

Sex differences in functional network dynamics observed using coactivation pattern analysis.

Laura Murray1,2, J Michael Maurer1,2,3, Alyssa L Peechatka1,2, Blaise B Frederick1,2, Roselinde H Kaiser4, Amy C Janes1,2.   

Abstract

Sex differences in the organization of large-scale resting-state brain networks have been identified using traditional static measures, which average functional connectivity over extended time periods. In contrast, emerging dynamic measures have the potential to define sex differences in network changes over time, providing additional understanding of neurobiological sex differences. To meet this goal, we used a Coactivation Pattern Analysis (CAP) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 181 males and 181 females from the Human Connectome Project. Significant main effects of sex were observed across two independent imaging sessions. Relative to males, females spent more total time in two transient network states (TNSs) spatially overlapping with the dorsal attention network and occipital/sensory-motor network. Greater time spent in these TNSs was related to females making more frequent transitions into these TNSs compared to males. In contrast, males spent more total time in TNSs spatially overlapping with the salience network, which was related to males staying for longer periods once entering these TNSs compared to females. State-to-state transitions also significantly differed between sexes: females transitioned more frequently from default mode network (DMN) states to the dorsal attention network state, whereas males transitioned more frequently from DMN states to salience network states. Results show that males and females spend differing amounts of time at rest in two distinct attention-related networks and show sex-specific transition patterns from DMN states into these attention-related networks. This work lays the groundwork for future investigations into the cognitive and behavioral implications of these sex-specific network dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sex differences; coactivation pattern analysis; functional magnetic resonance imaging; functional network dynamics; human connectome project; resting-state

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33734028      PMCID: PMC8448790          DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2021.1880383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1758-8928            Impact factor:   2.550


  33 in total

1.  Behavioral interpretations of intrinsic connectivity networks.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; P Mickle Fox; Simon B Eickhoff; Jessica A Turner; Kimberly L Ray; D Reese McKay; David C Glahn; Christian F Beckmann; Stephen M Smith; Peter T Fox
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Toward discovery science of human brain function.

Authors:  Bharat B Biswal; Maarten Mennes; Xi-Nian Zuo; Suril Gohel; Clare Kelly; Steve M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jonathan S Adelstein; Randy L Buckner; Stan Colcombe; Anne-Marie Dogonowski; Monique Ernst; Damien Fair; Michelle Hampson; Matthew J Hoptman; James S Hyde; Vesa J Kiviniemi; Rolf Kötter; Shi-Jiang Li; Ching-Po Lin; Mark J Lowe; Clare Mackay; David J Madden; Kristoffer H Madsen; Daniel S Margulies; Helen S Mayberg; Katie McMahon; Christopher S Monk; Stewart H Mostofsky; Bonnie J Nagel; James J Pekar; Scott J Peltier; Steven E Petersen; Valentin Riedl; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bart Rypma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Sein Schmidt; Rachael D Seidler; Greg J Siegle; Christian Sorg; Gao-Jun Teng; Juha Veijola; Arno Villringer; Martin Walter; Lihong Wang; Xu-Chu Weng; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Peter Williamson; Christian Windischberger; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong-Ying Zhang; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sex-related differences in intrinsic brain dynamism and their neurocognitive correlates.

Authors:  Nina de Lacy; Elizabeth McCauley; J Nathan Kutz; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Temporal Dynamics of Large-Scale Networks Predict Neural Cue Reactivity and Cue-Induced Craving.

Authors:  Kainan S Wang; Roselinde H Kaiser; Alyssa L Peechatka; Blaise B Frederick; Amy C Janes
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-07-18

Review 5.  Sex differences in adolescent depression: do sex hormones determine vulnerability?

Authors:  E F G Naninck; P J Lucassen; J Bakker
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.627

Review 6.  Co-activation patterns in resting-state fMRI signals.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Nanyin Zhang; Catie Chang; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention.

Authors:  Andrew P Bayliss; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-05

8.  A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting-state networks.

Authors:  Elena A Allen; Erik B Erhardt; Eswar Damaraju; William Gruner; Judith M Segall; Rogers F Silva; Martin Havlicek; Srinivas Rachakonda; Jill Fries; Ravi Kalyanam; Andrew M Michael; Arvind Caprihan; Jessica A Turner; Tom Eichele; Steven Adelsheim; Angela D Bryan; Juan Bustillo; Vincent P Clark; Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Francesca Filbey; Corey C Ford; Kent Hutchison; Rex E Jung; Kent A Kiehl; Piyadasa Kodituwakku; Yuko M Komesu; Andrew R Mayer; Godfrey D Pearlson; John P Phillips; Joseph R Sadek; Michael Stevens; Ursina Teuscher; Robert J Thoma; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-04

9.  Decomposition of spontaneous brain activity into distinct fMRI co-activation patterns.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Catie Chang; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04

10.  Resting states are resting traits--an FMRI study of sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in resting state cognitive control networks.

Authors:  Helene Hjelmervik; Markus Hausmann; Berge Osnes; René Westerhausen; Karsten Specht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Wearing a KN95/FFP2 facemask induces subtle yet significant brain functional connectivity modifications restricted to the salience network.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Marie-Louise Montandon; Cristelle Rodriguez; Panteleimon Giannakopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-10-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.