Feng Zhu1, Yaping Guan2, Jing Wang2. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 150 Jimo Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200120, China. zhufeng0630@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 150 Jimo Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200120, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) is currently accepted as the first challenge of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), especially in patients with altered anatomy such as Billroth II gastrectomy. A rotatable sphincterotome (RS) might be considered useful for guiding the directional axis of SBC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RS for biliary cannulation in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted to compare the efficacy and safety between RS (RS group) and conventional sphincterotome of pulling arciform knife (PAF, PAF group). The success rate of SBC and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) were evaluated in both the groups. Moreover, the outcomes of the procedure and adverse events were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Eighty-six consecutive prior Billroth II gastrectomy patients who underwent ERCP with RS or PAF during the study period were enrolled. After excluding 7 patients, there were 41 patients in the RS group and 38 in the PAF group. The baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups. There was no significant difference in the clinical success rates of SBC in RS group (95.12%) versus PAF group (84.21%), (P = 0.1082). Successful SBC within 5 min was 87.80% in RS group and 23.68% in PAF group (P < 0.0001). The success rate of EST was 89.74% in RS group and 28.13% in PAF group (P < 0.0001). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) showed significant differences between RS (2.44%) and PAF groups (21.05%; P = 0.0061). CONCLUSIONS: Although RS has comparable success rates of SBC over PAF in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy, RS has facilitated the procedure by increasing the success rate of EST and SBC within 5 min, and the incidence of PEP was lowered as well.
BACKGROUND: Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) is currently accepted as the first challenge of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), especially in patients with altered anatomy such as Billroth II gastrectomy. A rotatable sphincterotome (RS) might be considered useful for guiding the directional axis of SBC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RS for biliary cannulation in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted to compare the efficacy and safety between RS (RS group) and conventional sphincterotome of pulling arciform knife (PAF, PAF group). The success rate of SBC and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) were evaluated in both the groups. Moreover, the outcomes of the procedure and adverse events were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Eighty-six consecutive prior Billroth II gastrectomy patients who underwent ERCP with RS or PAF during the study period were enrolled. After excluding 7 patients, there were 41 patients in the RS group and 38 in the PAF group. The baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups. There was no significant difference in the clinical success rates of SBC in RS group (95.12%) versus PAF group (84.21%), (P = 0.1082). Successful SBC within 5 min was 87.80% in RS group and 23.68% in PAF group (P < 0.0001). The success rate of EST was 89.74% in RS group and 28.13% in PAF group (P < 0.0001). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) showed significant differences between RS (2.44%) and PAF groups (21.05%; P = 0.0061). CONCLUSIONS: Although RS has comparable success rates of SBC over PAF in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy, RS has facilitated the procedure by increasing the success rate of EST and SBC within 5 min, and the incidence of PEP was lowered as well.
Authors: Calvin H Y Chan; Frank N Brennan; Matthew J Zimmerman; Donald G Ormonde; Spiro Costa Raftopoulos; Ian F Yusoff Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Hyun Cheol Koo; Jong Ho Moon; Hyun Jong Choi; Bong Min Ko; Su Jin Hong; Young Koog Cheon; Young Deok Cho; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee; Chan Sup Shim Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Christoph F Dietrich; Noor L Bekkali; Sean Burmeister; Yi Dong; Simon M Everett; Michael Hocke; Andre Ignee; Wei On; Srisha Hebbar; Kofi Oppong; Siyu Sun; Christian Jenssen; Barbara Braden Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2022 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.628