Literature DB >> 33733211

Using Crowd-Sourced Speech Data to Study Socially Constrained Variation in Nonmodal Phonation.

Ben Gittelson1, Adrian Leemann2, Fabian Tomaschek3.   

Abstract

This study examines the status of nonmodal phonation (e.g. breathy and creaky voice) in British English using smartphone recordings from over 2,500 speakers. With this novel data collection method, it uncovers effects that have not been reported in past work, such as a relationship between speakers' education and their production of nonmodal phonation. The results also confirm that previous findings on nonmodal phonation, including the greater use of creaky voice by male speakers than female speakers, extend to a much larger and more diverse sample than has been considered previously. This confirmation supports the validity of using crowd-sourced data for phonetic analyses. The acoustic correlates that were examined include fundamental frequency, H1*-H2*, cepstral peak prominence, and harmonic-to-noise ratio.
Copyright © 2021 Gittelson, Leemann and Tomaschek.

Entities:  

Keywords:  British English; phonation; regional variation; smartphone apps; voice quality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33733211      PMCID: PMC7861257          DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.565682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Artif Intell        ISSN: 2624-8212


  18 in total

1.  Poor voice quality in future elite vocal performers and professional voice users.

Authors:  B Timmermans; M S De Bodt; F L Wuyts; A Boudewijns; G Clement; A Peeters; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Harmonics-to-noise ratio: an index of vocal aging.

Authors:  Carole T Ferrand
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Prevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment-seeking population.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Jaewhan Kim; Nelson Roy; Carl Asche; Mark Courey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic measurements-do they correlate?

Authors:  Laura Lehto; Laura Laaksonen; Erkki Vilkman; Paavo Alku
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.487

5.  Age, sex, and vowel dependencies of acoustic measures related to the voice source.

Authors:  Markus Iseli; Yen-Liang Shue; Abeer Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Assessing voice health using smartphones: bias and random error of acoustic voice parameters captured by different smartphone types.

Authors:  Stephen Jannetts; Felix Schaeffler; Janet Beck; Steve Cowen
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Acoustic characteristics of women's voices with advancing age.

Authors:  S E Linville; H B Fisher
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1985-05

8.  Voice disorders in the general population: prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact.

Authors:  Nelson Roy; Ray M Merrill; Steven D Gray; Elaine M Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.

Authors:  Yolanda D Heman-Ackah; Robert T Sataloff; Griet Laureyns; Deborah Lurie; Deirdre D Michael; Reinhardt Heuer; Adam Rubin; Robert Eller; Swapna Chandran; Mona Abaza; Karen Lyons; Venu Divi; Joanna Lott; Jennifer Johnson; James Hillenbrand
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Influence of Smartphones and Software on Acoustic Voice Measures.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Jenna N Brosious; Staci L Sorrell; Supraja Anand
Journal:  Int J Telerehabil       Date:  2016-12-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding the Phonetic Characteristics of Speech Under Uncertainty-Implications of the Representation of Linguistic Knowledge in Learning and Processing.

Authors:  Fabian Tomaschek; Michael Ramscar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.