Literature DB >> 33733209

Q-Finder: An Algorithm for Credible Subgroup Discovery in Clinical Data Analysis - An Application to the International Diabetes Management Practice Study.

Cyril Esnault1, May-Line Gadonna1, Maxence Queyrel1,2, Alexandre Templier1, Jean-Daniel Zucker2,3.   

Abstract

Addressing the heterogeneity of both the outcome of a disease and the treatment response to an intervention is a mandatory pathway for regulatory approval of medicines. In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), confirmatory subgroup analyses focus on the assessment of drugs in predefined subgroups, while exploratory ones allow a posteriori the identification of subsets of patients who respond differently. Within the latter area, subgroup discovery (SD) data mining approach is widely used-particularly in precision medicine-to evaluate treatment effect across different groups of patients from various data sources (be it from clinical trials or real-world data). However, both the limited consideration by standard SD algorithms of recommended criteria to define credible subgroups and the lack of statistical power of the findings after correcting for multiple testing hinder the generation of hypothesis and their acceptance by healthcare authorities and practitioners. In this paper, we present the Q-Finder algorithm that aims to generate statistically credible subgroups to answer clinical questions, such as finding drivers of natural disease progression or treatment response. It combines an exhaustive search with a cascade of filters based on metrics assessing key credibility criteria, including relative risk reduction assessment, adjustment on confounding factors, individual feature's contribution to the subgroup's effect, interaction tests for assessing between-subgroup treatment effect interactions and tests adjustment (multiple testing). This allows Q-Finder to directly target and assess subgroups on recommended credibility criteria. The top-k credible subgroups are then selected, while accounting for subgroups' diversity and, possibly, clinical relevance. Those subgroups are tested on independent data to assess their consistency across databases, while preserving statistical power by limiting the number of tests. To illustrate this algorithm, we applied it on the database of the International Diabetes Management Practice Study (IDMPS) to better understand the drivers of improved glycemic control and rate of episodes of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetics patients. We compared Q-Finder with state-of-the-art approaches from both Subgroup Identification and Knowledge Discovery in Databases literature. The results demonstrate its ability to identify and support a short list of highly credible and diverse data-driven subgroups for both prognostic and predictive tasks.
Copyright © 2020 Esnault, Gadonna, Queyrel, Templier and Zucker.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IDMPS; credibility criteria; exploratory subgroup analysis; hypothesis generation; precision medicine; predictive factor; prognostic factor; subgroup discovery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33733209      PMCID: PMC7861304          DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.559927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Artif Intell        ISSN: 2624-8212


  39 in total

1.  How to work with a subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Bernadette Dijkman; Bauke Kooistra; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Multiplicity issues in exploratory subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Ilya Lipkovich; Alex Dmitrienko; Christoph Muysers; Bohdana Ratitch
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040.

Authors:  K Ogurtsova; J D da Rocha Fernandes; Y Huang; U Linnenkamp; L Guariguata; N H Cho; D Cavan; J E Shaw; L E Makaroff
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.602

4.  Association between glycated hemoglobin A1c levels with age and gender in Chinese adults with no prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Qinglin Ma; Houming Liu; Guangxin Xiang; Wanshui Shan; Wanli Xing
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-03-29

5.  Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in-the-loop?

Authors:  Andreas Holzinger
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2016-03-02

6.  Quint: An R package for the identification of subgroups of clients who differ in which treatment alternative is best for them.

Authors:  Elise Dusseldorp; Lisa Doove; Iven van Mechelen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-06

7.  Relation Between Different Measures of Glycemic Exposure and Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rients P T van Wijngaarden; Jetty A Overbeek; Edith M Heintjes; Agata Schubert; Joris Diels; Huub Straatman; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ron M C Herings
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  Subgroup identification in clinical trials via the predicted individual treatment effect.

Authors:  Nicolás M Ballarini; Gerd K Rosenkranz; Thomas Jaki; Franz König; Martin Posch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of awareness of diabetes mellitus type II with treatment's outcome in term of direct cost in a hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Muaed Jamal Alomar; Khadeja Rashed Al-Ansari; Najeeb A Hassan
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2019-08-15

10.  Persistent poor glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes in developing countries: 12 years of real-world evidence of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS).

Authors:  Pablo Aschner; Juan J Gagliardino; Hasan Ilkova; Fernando Lavalle; Ambady Ramachandran; Jean Claude Mbanya; Marina Shestakova; Jean-Marc Chantelot; Juliana C N Chan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.