Literature DB >> 33733155

Toward "English" Phonetics: Variability in the Pre-consonantal Voicing Effect Across English Dialects and Speakers.

James Tanner1, Morgan Sonderegger1, Jane Stuart-Smith2, Josef Fruehwald3.   

Abstract

Recent advances in access to spoken-language corpora and development of speech processing tools have made possible the performance of "large-scale" phonetic and sociolinguistic research. This study illustrates the usefulness of such a large-scale approach-using data from multiple corpora across a range of English dialects, collected, and analyzed with the SPADE project-to examine how the pre-consonantal Voicing Effect (longer vowels before voiced than voiceless obstruents, in e.g., bead vs. beat) is realized in spontaneous speech, and varies across dialects and individual speakers. Compared with previous reports of controlled laboratory speech, the Voicing Effect was found to be substantially smaller in spontaneous speech, but still influenced by the expected range of phonetic factors. Dialects of English differed substantially from each other in the size of the Voicing Effect, whilst individual speakers varied little relative to their particular dialect. This study demonstrates the value of large-scale phonetic research as a means of developing our understanding of the structure of speech variability, and illustrates how large-scale studies, such as those carried out within SPADE, can be applied to other questions in phonetic and sociolinguistic research.
Copyright © 2020 Tanner, Sonderegger, Stuart-Smith and Fruehwald.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; English; dialectal variation; phonetic variability; speaker variability; voicing effect

Year:  2020        PMID: 33733155      PMCID: PMC7861323          DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.00038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Artif Intell        ISSN: 2624-8212


  17 in total

1.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

2.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction.

Authors:  Shravan Vasishth; Bruno Nicenboim; Mary E Beckman; Fangfang Li; Eun Jong Kong
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-08-29

Review 4.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Letter: Interaction between two factors that influence vowel duration.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The pursuit of invariance in speech signals.

Authors:  L Lisker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production.

Authors:  P A Luce; J Charles-Luce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Segmental durations in connected speech signals: preliminary results.

Authors:  T H Crystal; A S House
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English.

Authors:  R F Port; J Dalby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

10.  Structure in talker variability: How much is there and how much can it help?

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.