Literature DB >> 33733147

Predicting Biomass and Yield in a Tomato Phenotyping Experiment Using UAV Imagery and Random Forest.

Kasper Johansen1, Mitchell J L Morton2, Yoann Malbeteau1, Bruno Aragon1, Samer Al-Mashharawi1, Matteo G Ziliani1, Yoseline Angel1, Gabriele Fiene2, Sónia Negrão2,3, Magdi A A Mousa4,5, Mark A Tester2, Matthew F McCabe1.   

Abstract

Biomass and yield are key variables for assessing the production and performance of agricultural systems. Modeling and predicting the biomass and yield of individual plants at the farm scale represents a major challenge in precision agriculture, particularly when salinity and other abiotic stresses may play a role. Here, we evaluate a diversity panel of the wild tomato species (Solanum pimpinellifolium) through both field and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based phenotyping of 600 control and 600 salt-treated plants. The study objective was to predict fresh shoot mass, tomato fruit numbers, and yield mass at harvest based on a range of variables derived from the UAV imagery. UAV-based red-green-blue (RGB) imageries collected 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 weeks before harvest were also used to determine if prediction accuracies varied between control and salt-treated plants. Multispectral UAV-based imagery was also collected 1 and 2 weeks prior to harvest to further explore predictive insights. In order to estimate the end of season biomass and yield, a random forest machine learning approach was implemented using UAV-imagery-derived predictors as input variables. Shape features derived from the UAV, such as plant area, border length, width, and length, were found to have the highest importance in the predictions, followed by vegetation indices and the entropy texture measure. The multispectral UAV imagery collected 2 weeks prior to harvest produced the highest explained variances for fresh shoot mass (87.95%), fruit numbers (63.88%), and yield mass per plant (66.51%). The RGB UAV imagery produced very similar results to those of the multispectral UAV dataset, with the explained variance reducing as a function of increasing time to harvest. The results showed that predicting the yield of salt-stressed plants produced higher accuracies when the models excluded control plants, whereas predicting the yield of control plants was not affected by the inclusion of salt-stressed plants within the models. This research demonstrates that it is possible to predict the average biomass and yield up to 8 weeks prior to harvest within 4.23% of field-based measurements and up to 4 weeks prior to harvest at the individual plant level. Results from this work may be useful in providing guidance for yield forecasting of healthy and salt-stressed tomato plants, which in turn may inform growing practices, logistical planning, and sales operations.
Copyright © 2020 Johansen, Morton, Malbeteau, Aragon, Al-Mashharawi, Ziliani, Angel, Fiene, Negrão, Mousa, Tester and McCabe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RGB; UAV; biomass; multi-spectral; random forest; salinity; tomato plants; yield

Year:  2020        PMID: 33733147      PMCID: PMC7861253          DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Artif Intell        ISSN: 2624-8212


  22 in total

1.  Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification?

Authors:  Ulisses M Braga-Neto; Edward R Dougherty
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Non-Local Auto-Encoder With Collaborative Stabilization for Image Restoration.

Authors:  Ruxin Wang; Dacheng Tao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Modeling maize above-ground biomass based on machine learning approaches using UAV remote-sensing data.

Authors:  Liang Han; Guijun Yang; Huayang Dai; Bo Xu; Hao Yang; Haikuan Feng; Zhenhai Li; Xiaodong Yang
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.993

Review 4.  Breeding crops to feed 10 billion.

Authors:  Lee T Hickey; Amber N Hafeez; Hannah Robinson; Scott A Jackson; Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli; Mark Tester; Caixia Gao; Ian D Godwin; Ben J Hayes; Brande B H Wulff
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Imagery for Quantitative Monitoring of Wheat Crop in Small Plots.

Authors:  Camille C D Lelong; Philippe Burger; Guillaume Jubelin; Bruno Roux; Sylvain Labbé; Frédéric Baret
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  High-Throughput Phenotyping of Plant Height: Comparing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Ground LiDAR Estimates.

Authors:  Simon Madec; Fred Baret; Benoît de Solan; Samuel Thomas; Dan Dutartre; Stéphane Jezequel; Matthieu Hemmerlé; Gallian Colombeau; Alexis Comar
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Liakos; Patrizia Busato; Dimitrios Moshou; Simon Pearson; Dionysis Bochtis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  High-Throughput Phenotyping Enabled Genetic Dissection of Crop Lodging in Wheat.

Authors:  Daljit Singh; Xu Wang; Uttam Kumar; Liangliang Gao; Muhammad Noor; Muhammad Imtiaz; Ravi P Singh; Jesse Poland
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Phenotyping Using Morphometric and Spectral Analysis Can Quantify Responses of Wild Tomato Plants to Salinity Stress.

Authors:  Kasper Johansen; Mitchell J L Morton; Yoann M Malbeteau; Bruno Aragon; Samir K Al-Mashharawi; Matteo G Ziliani; Yoseline Angel; Gabriele M Fiene; Sónia S C Negrão; Magdi A A Mousa; Mark A Tester; Matthew F McCabe
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Gray-level invariant Haralick texture features.

Authors:  Tommy Löfstedt; Patrik Brynolfsson; Thomas Asklund; Tufve Nyholm; Anders Garpebring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Capturing crop adaptation to abiotic stress using image-based technologies.

Authors:  Nadia Al-Tamimi; Patrick Langan; Villő Bernád; Jason Walsh; Eleni Mangina; Sónia Negrão
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  High-resolution crop yield and water productivity dataset generated using random forest and remote sensing.

Authors:  Minghan Cheng; Xiyun Jiao; Lei Shi; Josep Penuelas; Lalit Kumar; Chenwei Nie; Tianao Wu; Kaihua Liu; Wenbin Wu; Xiuliang Jin
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 8.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.