Literature DB >> 33733144

Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies.

Brian M de Silva1, David M Higdon2, Steven L Brunton3, J Nathan Kutz1.   

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanying discrepancy model to account for the inevitable mismatch between theory and measurements. By revisiting the classic problem of modeling falling objects of different size and mass, we highlight a number of nuanced issues that must be addressed by modern data-driven methods for automated physics discovery. Specifically, we show that measurement noise and complex secondary physical mechanisms, like unsteady fluid drag forces, can obscure the underlying law of gravitation, leading to an erroneous model. We use the sparse identification of non-linear dynamics (SINDy) method to identify governing equations for real-world measurement data and simulated trajectories. Incorporating into SINDy the assumption that each falling object is governed by a similar physical law is shown to improve the robustness of the learned models, but discrepancies between the predictions and observations persist due to subtleties in drag dynamics. This work highlights the fact that the naive application of ML/AI will generally be insufficient to infer universal physical laws without further modification.
Copyright © 2020 de Silva, Higdon, Brunton and Kutz.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; discrepancy modeling; dynamical systems; machine learning; sparse regression; system identification

Year:  2020        PMID: 33733144      PMCID: PMC7861345          DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Artif Intell        ISSN: 2624-8212


  12 in total

1.  Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data.

Authors:  Michael Schmidt; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Learning partial differential equations via data discovery and sparse optimization.

Authors:  Hayden Schaeffer
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Sparse identification for nonlinear optical communication systems: SINO method.

Authors:  Mariia Sorokina; Stylianos Sygletos; Sergei Turitsyn
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Reactive SINDy: Discovering governing reactions from concentration data.

Authors:  Moritz Hoffmann; Christoph Fröhner; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Steven L Brunton; Joshua L Proctor; J Nathan Kutz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  No actual measurement … was required: Maxwell and Cavendish's null method for the inverse square law of electrostatics.

Authors:  Isobel Falconer
Journal:  Stud Hist Philos Sci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Sparse model selection via integral terms.

Authors:  Hayden Schaeffer; Scott G McCalla
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.529

8.  Model selection for dynamical systems via sparse regression and information criteria.

Authors:  N M Mangan; J N Kutz; S L Brunton; J L Proctor
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.704

9.  Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations.

Authors:  Samuel H Rudy; Steven L Brunton; Joshua L Proctor; J Nathan Kutz
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit.

Authors:  E Kaiser; J N Kutz; S L Brunton
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.704

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning.

Authors:  Simon Martina-Perez; Matthew J Simpson; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Data-Driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data Using Human-Understandable Machine Learning.

Authors:  Daria Kurz; Carlos Salort Sánchez; Cristian Axenie
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Data-driven model discovery of ideal four-wave mixing in nonlinear fibre optics.

Authors:  Andrei V Ermolaev; Anastasiia Sheveleva; Goëry Genty; Christophe Finot; John M Dudley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.