Literature DB >> 3373273

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in binocular visual cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and binocular properties.

H A Swadlow1.   

Abstract

1. In fully awake rabbits the stability of the two eyes was monitored and was sufficient to enable receptive-field analysis of antidromically identified efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in the binocular segment of visual area 1. Efferent neurons analyzed included callosal efferent neurons (CC neurons, n = 52), neurons projecting to visual area 2 (CV2 neurons, n = 35), corticotectal neurons (CT neurons, n = 43), and corticogeniculate neurons (CG neurons, n = 51). Six additional neurons projected a branching axon to both the corpus callosum and visual area 2. 2. Most CC and CV2 neurons were found in layer 2-3 and had receptive fields of the simple type. Only two corticocortical neurons with complex receptive fields were found. Orientation tuning ranges of CC and CV2 simple cells were similar and end stopping was prevalent in both CC (62%) and CV2 (45%) neurons. Axonal conduction velocities of CC and CV2 neurons were low (mean = 3.5 and 1.4 m/s, respectively) and visually nonresponsive CC neurons (19%) had conduction velocities that were significantly lower than visually responsive neurons. Spontaneous firing rates of corticocortical neurons were low (mean less than 1 spike/s) and these neurons responded to a lower range of stimulus velocities than did corticofugal neurons. 3. Most CG neurons had simple receptive fields and none had a complex field. Orientation tuning ranges of these neurons were comparable to those of CC and CV2 neurons, but a significantly smaller proportion (12%) were end stopped. Both spontaneous firing rates (mean = less than 1 spike/s) and axonal conduction velocities (mean = 2.4 m/s) of CG neurons were low and, as was found for CC neurons, visually nonresponsive CG neurons (25%) had significantly lower conduction velocities than did visually responsive neurons. 4. CT neurons had receptive fields that were predominantly complex (37%), motion/uniform (28%), or simple (26%). Conduction velocities (mean = 10.9 m/s) and spontaneous firing rates (mean = 7 spikes/s) of CT neurons of all receptive-field types were much higher than those of CC, CV2, and CG neurons. 5. An additional class of neurons was studied that responded synaptically at a short latency to electrical stimulation of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600-900 Hz. These neurons showed a high degree of synaptic convergence, also responding synaptically with a high-frequency burst of spikes to stimulation of both visual area 2 and the corpus callosum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3373273     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.59.4.1162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  29 in total

1.  The spatial receptive field of thalamic inputs to single cortical simple cells revealed by the interaction of visual and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Prakash Kara; John S Pezaris; Sergey Yurgenson; R Clay Reid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Activity of different classes of neurons of the motor cortex during locomotion.

Authors:  Irina N Beloozerova; Mikhail G Sirota; Harvey A Swadlow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Getting drowsy? Alert/nonalert transitions and visual thalamocortical network dynamics.

Authors:  Yulia Bereshpolova; Carl R Stoelzel; Jun Zhuang; Yael Amitai; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Harvey A Swadlow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The functional properties of barrel cortex neurons projecting to the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Takashi R Sato; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Precise rhythmicity in activity of neocortical, thalamic and brain stem neurons in behaving cats and rabbits.

Authors:  Witali L Dunin-Barkowski; Mikhail G Sirota; Andrew T Lovering; John M Orem; Edward H Vidruk; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Inhibition and brain work.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Kai Kaila; Marcus Raichle
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Lack of orientation and direction selectivity in a subgroup of fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons: cellular and synaptic mechanisms and comparison with other electrophysiological cell types.

Authors:  Lionel G Nowak; Maria V Sanchez-Vives; David A McCormick
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Layer 4 in primary visual cortex of the awake rabbit: contrasting properties of simple cells and putative feedforward inhibitory interneurons.

Authors:  Jun Zhuang; Carl R Stoelzel; Yulia Bereshpolova; Joseph M Huff; Xiaojuan Hei; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Harvey A Swadlow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The impact of an LGNd impulse on the awake visual cortex: synaptic dynamics and the sustained/transient distinction.

Authors:  Carl R Stoelzel; Yulia Bereshpolova; Alexander G Gusev; Harvey A Swadlow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Contrast-invariant orientation tuning in cat visual cortex: thalamocortical input tuning and correlation-based intracortical connectivity.

Authors:  T W Troyer; A E Krukowski; N J Priebe; K D Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.