Literature DB >> 3373265

The significance of residual mediastinal abnormality on the chest radiograph following treatment for Hodgkin's disease.

J A Radford1, R A Cowan, M Flanagan, G Dunn, D Crowther, R J Johnson, B Eddleston.   

Abstract

The chest radiographs (CXRs) of 110 patients with mediastinal Hodgkin's disease (HD) were reviewed to determine the incidence, degree, and significance of mediastinal abnormalities following treatment. Residual mediastinal abnormalities were defined as either minimal or measurable, and occurred in 64% of all patients at the completion of treatment, but were more common in those with bulky mediastinal disease at presentation (40 of 48, 83%). Fifty-one patients with a mediastinal abnormality at the end of treatment had follow-up films available. Partial or complete regression of the abnormality occurred by 1 year in 30 of these patients (59%). Over a median follow-up of 80.5 months, there were more relapses (13 of 70, 19%) in patients with residual abnormalities following treatment than in those where the mediastinum was considered normal (four of 40, 10%). Measurable abnormality was associated with a higher relapse rate (six of 25, 24%) than minimal abnormality (seven of 45, 16%), but none of these differences were statistically significant. the subsequent relapse rate for patients with persisting abnormality at 1 year was 14%, compared with 17% for patients in whom regression had occurred and 14% in whom the mediastinum had always been considered normal. Considering the whole group, the presence of a mediastinal abnormality following treatment did not predict for relapse, but for the 34 patients treated by chemotherapy (CTR) alone, a residual abnormality was associated with a significantly higher relapse rate (P = .029). We conclude that following mediastinal radiotherapy (XRT) administered either alone or combined with CTR, residual mediastinal abnormalities do not indicate the need for further treatment. However, following CTR alone, such abnormalities may signify persisting disease and we recommend that XRT be considered for these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3373265     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.6.940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of response to therapy using conventional imaging.

Authors:  Sheila C Rankin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging and 67Ga scan versus computed tomography in the staging and in the monitoring of mediastinal malignant lymphoma: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  M Bendini; C Zuiani; M Bazzocchi; G Dalpiaz; F Zaja; E Englaro
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1996 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Characterizing tumors using metabolic imaging: PET imaging of cellular proliferation and steroid receptors.

Authors:  D A Mankoff; F Dehdashti; A F Shields
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 4.  Hodgkin's disease--I: Identification and classification.

Authors:  P Carde
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-11

5.  Assessment of the nature of residual masses at end of treatment in lymphoma patients using volume perfusion computed tomography.

Authors:  R Syha; L Grünwald; T Horger; D Spira; D Ketelsen; W Vogel; C D Claussen; M Horger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Interim [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in stage I-II non-bulky Hodgkin lymphoma: would using combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography criteria better predict response than each test alone?

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Heiko Schöder; Jeffrey L Johnson; Nathan C Hall; Lawrence H Schwartz; David J Straus; Ann S LaCasce; Sin-Ho Jung; Nancy L Bartlett; George P Canellos; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2012-08-28

Review 8.  Imaging in oncology--over a century of advances.

Authors:  Bhuey Sharma; Axel Martin; Susannah Stanway; Stephen R D Johnston; Anastasia Constantinidou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Gallium-67 scintigraphy: a cornerstone in functional imaging of lymphoma.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir; Ora Israel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging for staging malignant lymphoma in children.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Malou A Vermoolen; Marc B Bierings; Willem P Mali; Rutger A J Nievelstein
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.