| Literature DB >> 33732552 |
Ingmar Janse1, Rick Beeloo1, Arno Swart1, Michael Visser2, Leo Schouls1, Engeline van Duijkeren1, Mark W J van Passel1,3.
Abstract
Genome sequences provide information on the genetic elements present in an organism, and currently there are databases containing hundreds of thousands of bacterial genome sequences. These repositories allow for mining patterns concerning antibiotic resistance gene occurrence in both pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in e.g. natural or animal environments, and link these to relevant metadata such as bacterial host species, country and year of isolation, and co-occurrence with other resistance genes. In addition, the advances in the prediction of mobile genetic elements, and discerning chromosomal from plasmid DNA, broadens our view on the mechanism mediating dissemination. In this study we utilize the vast amount of data in the public database PATRIC to investigate the dissemination of carbapenemase-encoding genes (CEGs), the emergence and spread of which is considered a grave public health concern. Based on publicly available genome sequences from PATRIC and manually curated CEG sequences from the beta lactam database, we found 7,964 bacterial genomes, belonging to at least 70 distinct species, that carry in total 9,892 CEGs, amongst which bla NDM, bla OXA, bla VIM, bla IMP and bla KPC. We were able to distinguish between chromosomally located resistance genes (4,137; 42%) and plasmid-located resistance genes (5,753; 58%). We found that a large proportion of the identified CEGs were identical, i.e. displayed 100% nucleotide similarity in multiple bacterial species (8,361 out of 9,892 genes; 85%). For example, the New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase NDM-1 was found in 42 distinct bacterial species, and present in seven different environments. Our data show the extent of carbapenem-resistance far beyond the canonical species Acetinobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These types of data complement previous systematic reviews, in which carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were found in wildlife, livestock and companion animals. Considering the widespread distribution of CEGs, we see a need for comprehensive surveillance and transmission studies covering more host species and environments, akin to previous extensive surveys that focused on extended spectrum beta-lactamases. This may help to fully appreciate the spread of CEGs and improve the understanding of mechanisms underlying transmission, which could lead to interventions minimizing transmission to humans. ©2021 Janse et al.Entities:
Keywords: Carbapenem-resistance; Carbapenemase encoding genes; Genome repositories; Public genome sequences
Year: 2021 PMID: 33732552 PMCID: PMC7953867 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Distribution of the 9,892 carbapenemase-encoding genes in bacterial species and non-human reservoirs.
Horizontal lines represent reservoirs (A) or bacterial species (B) that collectively harbor different CEGs. Vertical lines represent CEGs that occur in many different bacterial species or reservoirs: four genes have been highlighted. The figure was simplified by removing the rare CEGs, and the full data is available in Files S6–S8.
Distribution of carbapenemase-encoding genes (CEG) in bacterial genomes.
The 9,892 CEGs occur in 7,884 bacterial genomes. The majority of genes (6,191) is present in a single copy in its genome, but 3,701 genes reside in a genome with additional carbapenemase-encoding genes.
| Number of different CEGs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Number of CEGs per genome | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 81 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 21 | 52 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 8 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
Diversity of CEGs in the 11 reservoirs distinguished in the genome database.
| Pig | 1 | NDM-1 | 1 | |
| Cattle | 3 | OXA-146,OXA-23,OXA-58 | 1 | |
| Plant | 3 | CGB-1,OXA-120,OXA-65 | 2 | |
| Chicken | 5 | NDM-1,NDM-5,NDM-9,OXA-68,VIM-48 | 5 | |
| Food | 5 | BcII-1,IMP-27,NDM-1,OXA-497,VIM-1 | 6 | |
| Pets | 9 | NDM-1,NDM-5,NDM-9,OXA-23,OXA-500,OXA-58,OXA-68,OXA-69,VIM-2 | 6 | |
| Soil | 10 | BcII-1,KPC-2,NDM-1,OXA-213,OXA-273,OXA-64,OXA-65,OXA-72,OXA-91,VIM-5 | 10 | |
| Wastewater | 11 | GES-5,KPC-2,NDM-1,NDM-4,NDM-5,NDM-9,OXA-23,OXA-48,OXA-58,SHV-38,VIM-2 | 11 | |
| Water | 13 | KPC-2,KPC-3,NDM-1,NDM-5,NDM-9,OXA-269,OXA-273,OXA-280,OXA-360,OXA-444,OXA-48,OXA-72,SPM-1 | 14 | |
| Miscellaneous | 109 | 48 | ||
| Human | 175 | 73 |
Notes.
For the full names, please refer to File S4.
The list of genes is in the File S6.
The list of species is in the File S7.